Lord Sovereign
The resident Britbong
Trump's been on fire recently. It seems that 2020 taught him a very hard lesson.
Yes, it's already established and I stated previously that it doesn't matter that he was appointed by Trump. Trump was far from infallible and backing wrong people is far from impossible. I think the judge is a rino and didn't give Trump a fair shake. Nothing ad hominem about that.
I really don't give a shit. This is about whether the election to one of the most powerful countries on the planet, if not the most powerful, in terms of importance, the rest of his workload can take a hike.
Already been over this and I'm not going to repeat myself.
Because they pushed, incessantly the notion of "orange man bad". For five years, again, five years they have been pushing the narrative that Trump was the second coming of Hitler, that he's evil, a fascist, a moron etc-etc. The media, big tech etc have done nothing but go into rabid hysterics about him for five years. I've repeated this enough that hopefully it'll get through to you this time.
Yes, because without hindsight, Trump would know exactly who would stab him in the back.
Did you see the same rallies I saw? Trump packed out venues. In some cases they had to move it outside because there were so many people. In Biden's rallies, you could count the attendees on one or two hands. This happened consistently.
I don't have to refute a Stormfront writer that the Holocaust doesn't happen either. Same energy my dude.
Snip.
Your incorrect opinion on Romney is noted and ignored.
That's not my definition and you're welcome to claim it's mine as many times as you like but I will both ignore them and not care.
Yes, present some poles that were no doubt heavily skewed and doctored. Why not pull out some fact checking sites that are equally as biased.
.Snip.
I'm not familiar with you, honestly, so I can't say if this is true or not but Trump is far from as bad as Fauci and Obama.
Oh come on now, since when has Bill been relevant to anything outside of that painting of him in a dress on Epstein's island. You don't think the incessant "I'm with her," or the figurines (including those of Fauci and Obama) or the comics like Female Force or when she was in a Valiant comic about a fat female hero.
That's fine, I don't care either way. Just as I doubt you care about my stance but my chief concern is that he got cheated out of an election and that he's no where near as bad as he's portrayed to be. A bit of an oaf certainly but he genuinely seems to care about the country and it's people. A damn sight more than others.
Quite probably, N. Korea, like all communist countries can't be trusted to not go back on their word but it was still an achievement and Trump managed to get N. Korea going from "Trump is a dotard," to Jung-On offering military aid (yes, I know, it's stupid) so clearly his opinion on him changed.
When Trump, as the commander in chief of the US military asked for American soldiers to return home, he was lied to about it. That's quite a different spin on things you're trying to say.
Do you mean the time he said it was a difficult job? Yeah, I can see that. I can't imagine what running a country, particularly on the scale of the US would be like. Still, he rose to the challenge and his presidency was nowhere near as bad as people have claimed it to be.
Snip.
Wait, do you mean the handful of businesses that didn't succeed? Trump got a lump sum of money from his father and used that to turn himself into a billionaire. Yes, going from a millionaire on loan to a billionaire certainly paints him as a bad business man.
Trump's been on fire recently. It seems that 2020 taught him a very hard lesson.
Good; hopefully he can wrest control of the Republican party from the establishment. Though I'm not sure he'll be able to resist the temptation to build alliances with those pretending to be on his side again.
I mean, this is the part to me that's the most ridiculous about all this.Because they pushed, incessantly the notion of "orange man bad". For five years, again, five years they have been pushing the narrative that Trump was the second coming of Hitler, that he's evil, a fascist, a moron etc-etc. The media, big tech etc have done nothing but go into rabid hysterics about him for five years. I've repeated this enough that hopefully it'll get through to you this time.
Both.I mean, this is the part to me that's the most ridiculous about all this.
You people rant and rave about Big Media, Big Tech, Big Business, the Democratic and Republican Establishment, all of these groups of wealthy and powerful people uniting together to fight against Trump and his great revolution......but then turn around and find the idea of Trump losing to such a coalition to be utterly impossible.
So are these people powerful enemies, or are they are not powerful enemies?
Both.
They are idiots with money
Gotta exceed expectationsHave to admit I didn't expect to get an immediate doublethink answer to my question, so kudos to being upfront about it.
‘Powerful’ doesn’t mean ‘invincible’ or ‘crafty’.Have to admit I didn't expect to get an immediate doublethink answer to my question, so kudos to being upfront about it.
It however, does mean that you can conceive of losing legitimately to them.‘Powerful’ doesn’t mean ‘invincible’ or ‘crafty’.
No.It however, does mean that you can conceive of losing legitimately to them.
Powerful enough to cheat their way to a win.I mean, this is the part to me that's the most ridiculous about all this.
You people rant and rave about Big Media, Big Tech, Big Business, the Democratic and Republican Establishment, all of these groups of wealthy and powerful people uniting together to fight against Trump and his great revolution......but then turn around and find the idea of Trump losing to such a coalition to be utterly impossible.
So are these people powerful enemies, or are they are not powerful enemies?
Well, that's a nice little Goldilocks zone you've managed to get your enemies into. Not powerful enough to win legitimately, but powerful enough to be a real challenge. It's nice how these little narratives work.Powerful enough to cheat their way to a win.
I mean, this is the part to me that's the most ridiculous about all this.
You people rant and rave about Big Media, Big Tech, Big Business, the Democratic and Republican Establishment, all of these groups of wealthy and powerful people uniting together to fight against Trump and his great revolution......but then turn around and find the idea of Trump losing to such a coalition to be utterly impossible.
So are these people powerful enemies, or are they are not powerful enemies?
So you deny then the fact that the Democrats cheated in the 2020 election? Despite all the evidence presented since in the form of videos, eyewitness testimony, and official government documents? You're either a willfully ignorant fool, or a conniving liar.Well, that's a nice little Goldilocks zone you've managed to get your enemies into. Not powerful enough to win legitimately, but powerful enough to be a real challenge. It's nice how these little narratives work.
It's also very convenient how you just know what the general will of the US population is, and how you just know that the people are behind you for all your efforts. This is of course, very different from every other tyrant starting from Robespierre who used "the general will" as an excuse to rape, butcher, and plunder without suffering the slightest pangs of moral conscience. I wish I had that sort of knowledge.
Notice how you're not actually trying to argue that the Democrats didn't cheat? You're just trying to argue that they would have won anyways, by making a lot of vague claims that you and you alone had your finger on the pulse of what the American people were thinking during the 2020 election.Were you better off in November 2020 than you were in November 2016? Stuck in your home, unable to go out, seeing your loved ones die to COVID, or watching your cities burn due to rioting or looting or fearing where you would get your next job or how you would pay your rent?
You might argue that these things were exaggerated. You might argue that these things aren't Trump's fault. Heck, I might even agree with you on some of these points. But to the ordinary person, who doesn't pay attention to politics and who doesn't vote for anyone beyond the President? The answer is that they weren't better off in November 2020 compared to November 2016. And when you have, in your own words, Big Media and Big Tech and all those rich powerful people shouting that it is Trump's fault, it's hardly implausible for people to decide it is Trump's fault and to go for the other guy. But you're the one with the parasocial feelings, and so it's just become impossible to accept that the outcome was possible, let alone probable.