D
Deleted member
Guest
@The Immortal Watch Dog in response to your questions... I think your view of policy is too narrow. I reject the entire prepositional foundation of the modern world.
@The Immortal Watch Dog in response to your questions... I think your view of policy is too narrow. I reject the entire prepositional foundation of the modern world.
I mean, I was ballparking there and being rather general. I agree though, my stances are about targeting immediate problems while subtly building the foundations for longer problem solving. By the way, feudalism with modern tech sounds awesome on paper until you realize that's communism.
What's your vision boss? I'm kinda curious about how you would see things set up if you could? I might find myself in agreement here.
I would say that the idea you could compare feudalism to communism is badly flawed, and reflective of just how little the modern world understands feudalism.
The eye-opening moment for me was reading Solzhenitsyn's defence of the medieval times in the Red Wheel Cycle. Not to say we need precisely feudalism. But, first of all, I don't believe there's a universal solution to governance.
I think that any given combination of ecoregion and culture will probably have a different optimal natural solution to governance. Some of those will be Republics and some will be Monarchies, but to be ultimately stable and enduring, they will evolve local particularisms which suit their people and environment. Of course, by referring to the Perennial philosophy--the principles in the west best represented in Neo-Platonism--we can define certain standards to which any enduring and righteous government must adhere.
Dealing with the mess in the United States today, but also the commitment and belief of the people and the legacy of the past three hundred years, I would certainly advocate for something very different than I would in a clean-sheet ideal world.
And also-people had premarital sex before 1969. In the 1940s and 1920s. Even in puritan New England.
Adultery happened, and has happened since the beginning of marriage, as people will inevitably be dissatisfied with their spouses at some point.
All the sexual revolution did for the above is normalize them, when before they were officially condemned but still very much aspects of sex in society that could not be suppressed.
As for burning itself out-the gay rights movement may(hopefully) be the last real triumph of the sexual revolution.
Everything else-incest, polyamory, pedophilia, and beyond(like zoophilia or necrophilia) are either too niche(polyamory still only appeals to a very small section of the population, far smaller than homosexuals),
incest-I can see being normalized but never something promoted widely, beyond, "if your a consenting adult and want to bang your sister, be you", and even then I doubt it will officially be decriminalized, just no longer prosecuted for the small section of society that does it consensually.
pedophilia and anything else-will require a total collapse of social morals, the very idea of consent itself would need to be disposed of-for the triumph of those forms of degeneracy.
Also I don't think we have seen the full fruits of the sexual revolution-but once it has ripened and rotted in its fullest, people will see through it, as your example bring up.
It may depend on how one defines being right wing. Of course, some of us may also be concealing our true power levelI'd argue I'm probably the furthest right-wing person here, but that's primarily because @The Name of Love has, in my view, a tint of bourgeoisie sensibility which is further to the left than being a strict aristocrat.
Those are far left positions.For instance I support the right to bear arms ... except I also would like universal background checks, mandatory gun safety classes. and something like a 'No-fly list' for guns. I'm well aware it won't stop Gun Violence entirely but I prefer the idea to mitigate the problems rather than accepting the downsides of having so many guns. Sadly the NRA began demonizing any measure of gun control.
It may depend on how one defines being right wing. Of course, some of us may also be concealing our true power level
I too have horrific psychological trauma from parental smoochiness.I believe in the sanctity not only of marriage and the family, but the gross immorality of behavior they celebrate.
I should have correctly placed my commas.I too have horrific psychological trauma from parental smoochiness.
And yourI should have correctly placed my commas.
Silly me.
@Tyanna of Pentos
I know we disagree on that. Religion aside-what really makes me "far right" is my burning world consuming hate for all forms of degeneracy.
That is why folks on the left have called me a fascist.
I believe in the sanctity not only of marriage and the family, but the gross immorality of behavior they celebrate.
I have absolutely no idea what your talking about.And your
's. More ****ing inexcusable than whatever you're pretending isn't fascism at this point. Have half the mind to move to /pol/ where at least overused
's are considered a serious taboo.