The Kennedys losing power.Dr. Fauci, the Clinton's, and the Biden's being free of prison argues against that.
The Rockefellers basically being behind the scenes and mot as powerful as they used to be.
The Kennedys losing power.Dr. Fauci, the Clinton's, and the Biden's being free of prison argues against that.
The Kennedy's losing power was because your predecessors in the intel business put a bullet in 2 of them.The Kennedys losing power.
The Rockefellers basically being behind the scenes and mot as powerful as they used to be.
I mean, they don't hold the same power.The Kennedy's losing power was because your predecessors in the intel business put a bullet in 2 of them.
As for the Rockefellers, they never lost power, they just changed the name from Standard Oil to Exxon and learned to diversify holdings to stay clear of anti-trust laws.
Not holding the same power =/= held to account for their crimes against their country, including the Rockefellers selling oil to the Nazi's.I mean, they don't hold the same power.
Most of the big name families that were around during the boom in the US no longer have the same power.
And most if the Rockefeller family may get the money from it but arnt directly invovled anymore
Not really these days.There's a difference between "not being held to account" and "still being in power"
Not really these days.
Doesn’t matter how scary they are if they have people willing to follow their commands.The most dangerous of the lot are old as fuck and their kids....not nearly as scary or as numerous.
Doesn’t matter how scary they are if they have people willing to follow their commands.
Assuming there’s anything left by that point.We call that historical inertia and yes that lasts awhile, but over time fewer and fewer people are willing to follow the commands, more people defect to the other side and one day it just all collapses at once a decades long process yes but its already started.
Assuming there’s anything left by that point.
I kinda agree with this, but ever since reading up about the Samson option, I'm not too sure.We call that historical inertia and yes that lasts awhile, but over time fewer and fewer people are willing to follow the commands, more people defect to the other side and one day it just all collapses at once a decades long process yes but its already started.
I kinda agree with this, but ever since reading up about the Samson option, I'm not too sure.
These sorts of people don't like losing, they're the sort of creeps that on their deathbed would press the 'fuck the world' button without a thought. They are salty about losing, but they're glad they've made you lose too!
Given how many nukes, plagues, chemical weapons and god knows what else is in hiding around the globe, it wouldn't surprise me if the guys on top have a lot of access to it all. If they already control the world why not it's fancier stuff?
Of course they'd lose, but the point is they'd make everyone else lose as well. Basically flipping the finger as they go down.They would still lose and end up becoming one of histories monsters. Possible yes because they act like spoiled children but it just makes their end that much more gruesome when it does come.
Of course they'd lose, but the point is they'd make everyone else lose as well. Basically flipping the finger as they go down.
Cherico, you were on SB when Little Boy was postulated.A very human thing but it won't save them.
Thing is by that point allowing them to remain in power will be worse then what ever they unleash as a final fuck you.
I suppose we will cross that bridge when we come to it.Cherico, you were on SB when Little Boy was postulated.
What if someone wants to kill the lampreys as a final fuck-you?
It's a global problem that we all have.They don't control bioweapons but somehow covid happened and they did everything in their power to force a toxic vaccine on everyone.
These aren't good people. And the people they installed in influential important positions aren't good either.