Because the same establishment uses the same arguments against many right wing people in the west. Ironically, some of the very people who now are outraged about establishment supporting "nazis" in Ukraine were called nazis by the same people over last years.So then why did you pretend to care about people "using the same arguments" as the establishment?
As i said, probably helped. But that's quite different from causing it. If there was no sentiment on the ground, there would be no coup to cause.So you do not deny the US effectively did cause the Maidan coup, you just think it was justified. Fair enough.
So what are you saying is that the west should let Russia conquer Ukraine, because Biden is now US president, after Bidens did corrupt deals with pro-Russian oligarchs in Ukraine?As for Burisma, the issue isn't the ownership, it's the connections to Biden, Pelosi, and others that I was talking about as the issue. The buyout and move to Cypress is interesting, but doesn't change the conflict of interest between Burisma and the Biden Admin. Which I think you understood, but did not want to address, because it goes back to the fact Ukraine was and still is riddled with corruption.
Now explain to me slowly how that makes sense.
But what was the shady shit? Does anyone know?Do not pretend that the shady shit between the Ukrainian gov and Biden Admin do not exist, or that Zelenski's backers do not have overlap with Azov's backers.
So? There was always shady shit in that region. I prefer that to not be Russian shady shit. Bidens et al are far away and distracted by many other corrupt deals all over the world. For Russia, this is an immediate imperial venture of historical importance, they won't just randomly forget to continue it.
That's what you get for talking about EU like an empire.Yes, as well as the 'wannabe superpower shit'
If you Poles want to burn your own resources in this attempt to contain Russia I do not care, you are supposedly a democracy,
and your oligarchy/deep state is your own.
What I do not care about is being dragged indirectly into your little quixotic, paranoia-fueled anti-Russia crusades, and since we are both in the EU and NATO that means that we are basically have one foot tied together.
Should have considered geopolitical stability as a greater factor in the risk assessment for your investments.Russia is much larger, both where size and resources are concerned, and where total population is concerned.
As it happens yours and the Ukrainians shenanigans is costing me money already.
Then why the fuck are they taking over Ukraine? We both know that its about more ambitious concepts than mere minerals and area.Russia does not have any interest in trying to take you over, you do not have the resources to be worth taking over and they have the most land and minerals on the planet, literally.
No, just anti Russian proto-empire reborn ones.You despise them and there is very little cultural similarity between you two.
You are not controlling large swaths of Belarussian and Ukrainian territory, nor are you supporting anti-soviet forces.
And these two last points are connected.Ideological disease, try gangrene devouring a whole limb.
You identify as whatever you want to identify, I do not see myself as a part of the West, once I wanted to be more western, but since then I have found the west lacking.
Furthermore, the west is very inconsistent and self-obsessed, they will dump you when they have the slightest incentive and you are shilling for the UK and USA like mad.
Furthermore, the bigger powers in the EU probably hate you for being a US/UK trojan horse and for messing up their relationships with the Russians.
There are reasons why Poland has such a complicated relationship with the EU, that some factions there would indeed be eager to sacrifice our (and many other eastern countries') interests for more corrupt business with Russia is one of the biggest. Hence maintaining the alternate option with US/UK.