"If"
There's no If.
The Pentagon is owned by China, so is the guy whose in the Whitehouse. People need to realize the US defense apparatus is infested with traitors and wumaos. Good little Gweilos who will jump at their masters beck and call.
We will lose any military conflict with China..not because the average American soldier is inferior, or because the Sergeants are disloyal. But because our leadership is comprised entirely of oathbreakers. And because they will purposefully throw any military conflict that threatens their masters.
We're going to lose Taiwan and Japan and Korea will end up standing alone, unless the next person in the Whitehouse has the sense and the courage to conduct a total purge of the DOD, the State Department and the armed services branches and does something to limit the power of the defense lobby. Then, only then can the US win this and win it with something approaching easy.
But not with current leadership...Hell some of them might even engineer accidental friendly fire incidents that'll sink US carriers.
Good grief. Every time I think 'Maybe he's not as crazy as I remember,' I come across one of your posts like this.
This isn't a sober analysis of a serious threat, it's
hysteria.
There's a lot of problems with what you've posted here, but probably the biggest problem of them all is as follows:
No matter how many traitors and incompetents further up the chain of command try to sabotage things, every man who gets to the point where he is under fire is going to work to save his own life. And in a modern naval/air threat environment, that means killing the enemy before he can kill you, because it will take
far too long to get out of range for running to be a viable option.
No, the influence games China has played, the people they've bribed, the technology and intelligence they've stolen, this is all to try to keep America from getting into war in the first place. Sure, if war comes, they'll also try to use it to degrade our ability to fight them effectively, but there's a fundamental difference between a corrupt official taking bribes and an outright enemy agent:
An enemy agent will actively work to destroy you. The corrupt official is in it for himself, which means that risking his career, much less his life, to take a stand/actions that would clearly get him fired, voted out of office, or outright tried for treason, is not something that he's going to do.
The problem with bribing corrupt officials to do things for you, is that you get what you pay for. The temporary 'friendship' of corrupt officials.
It's one thing to let China get away with manipulating currency markets, to pretend that they don't owe the world a debt in blood and treasure for the Wu Flu, to let them dump shitty steel on your markets. It's another thing entirely to let them crash the entire high-end tech industry for the next few years. There's a lot more money and influence in that.
