Apparently, this quote is intentionally misattributed to avoid negative connotations.
The ADL especially, and I'm not even American and I hold this viewpoint. They're like PeTA.The ADL and SPLC are both jokes that no one should ever take seriously. To go a step further both could be considered hostile foreign state actors.
The ADL and SPLC are both jokes that no one should ever take seriously.
The ADL and SPLC are both jokes that no one should ever take seriously. To go a step further both could be considered hostile foreign state actors.
Cash for Clunkers was a project that the Democrats didn't think through. In this case it was stupidity not malice.
It was very much malicious.Cash for Clunkers was a project that the Democrats didn't think through. In this case it was stupidity not malice.
Timeline doesn't fit for that scenario. If they did it now, maybe. But in 2008? When there was no method of tracking even coming down the pike? 20 years prior to the shut down codes? Time doesn't work.
this was not about union jobs.Timeline doesn't fit for that scenario. If they did it now, maybe. But in 2008? When there was no method of tracking even coming down the pike? 20 years prior to the shut down codes? Time doesn't work.
No, instead this was simple corruption. Dems wanted to benefit their union workers by keeping their jobs.
It was about jobs. Few or no politicians actually believes in green stuff. They believe in votes though.this was not about union jobs.
it was about their green hysteria.
Wasn't stupid. The destruction of the used car market was the entire point, as it jacked prices. It was completely intentional and smart. The side benefit of fucking over poor people is a bonus as well to the Dems, as poor people vote D.They destroyed the traded in cars. So stupid.
Timeline doesn't fit for that scenario. If they did it now, maybe. But in 2008? When there was no method of tracking even coming down the pike? 20 years prior to the shut down codes? Time doesn't work.
No, instead this was simple corruption. Dems wanted to benefit their union workers by keeping their jobs.
Given they've repeatedly shown themselves incapable of it? Yes. They aren't great at planning. In fact, the dems have never been good at planning, and that's why they are winning. There was no great long term plan in the long march through the institutions. Just a simple, individually incentivized approach: become a professor (because that's the only job in my field), then teach socialism (because that's all I know). A drop of water doesn't need a complex plan to ruin you basement, just the knowledge of "what way gets me lower faster" and your house being at the bottom of the hill.You think they really can’t plan the broad strokes ahead by a decade or so?