BlackDragon98

Freikorps Kommandant
Banned - Politics
Just found a image of Phil Murphy with President in Exile Trump and it looks hilarious.

1024px-President_Trump_Meets_with_the_Governor_of_New_Jersey_%2849838679257%29.jpg


Trump: "Hey Murphy, y'all right there?"

Murphy: *Hurr durr. It's gonna be "cheese pizzas" and "hot dogs" for "dinner". Hurr durr.*
 

Bigking321

Well-known member
Goodness.

I had written him off as a moderate republican. Figured he would do a few things to look good for the base then settle down into establishment swampiness.

It's still way to early to tell but if he keeps this up the whole time...

He could have a interesting future ahead of him.

Maybe. We'll see.
 

49ersfootball

Well-known member
Goodness.

I had written him off as a moderate republican. Figured he would do a few things to look good for the base then settle down into establishment swampiness.

It's still way to early to tell but if he keeps this up the whole time...

He could have a interesting future ahead of him.

Maybe. We'll see.
I think Youngkin will be gunning for the Presidency in 2028 because the GOP will be pressuring him to run by then (assuming Biden wins reelection in 2024).
 

S'task

Renegade Philosopher
Administrator
Staff Member
Founder
I think Youngkin will be gunning for the Presidency in 2028 because the GOP will be pressuring him to run by then (assuming Biden wins reelection in 2024).
It is really hard for Virginia governors to push into the national consciousness. It's one of the major downsides of our one term limit, the Governor lacks the ability to really be able to build a strong national identity. It's one of the reasons that the career track in the later 20th century Virginia has commonly been Governor > Senator and then usually being stuck as a Senator because, again, it's hard to build out a national platform as a Senator. The last Virginia governor turned Senator who may have even had an outside chance at eventually making a Presidential run, George Allen, was systematically destroyed by the Washington Post by creating one of the most transparent false scandals of all time. Even then, he would have been a longshot due to lack of name recognition on the national stage.
 

49ersfootball

Well-known member
Biden's popularity is in free-fall now, and it's increasingly difficult to lie about his clear senility.

What on earth makes you think he'll be able to run, much less win in 2024?
I was referring to Youngkin's presidential prospects in 2028.

On Biden: he keeps saying he's seeking reelection in 2024, but we'll find out following the 2022 Midterms in November.
 

History Learner

Well-known member

Except taking "scalps" requires actual action, not rhetoric or empty platitudes which is exactly what this is. It's meant for Republican voters more concerned with the idea of "owning the Libs" rather than doing or accomplishing anything of merit. It's why the GOP failed to achieve anything of relevancy for the average American during the Trump Presidency and why the Democrats can so fundamentally cuck them now; it's all an act, they have the same donors and they doll out absolute slop like this action by Youngkin just to give you the allusion they actually do anything.

Friendly question to the audience: What was the "totally based and Anti-Woke" Youngkin doing in May-June of 2020 as cities across the nation burned? Might also want to look into who is on his staff now lol.
 

Bigking321

Well-known member
It's why the GOP failed to achieve anything of relevancy for the average American during the Trump Presidency and why the Democrats can so fundamentally cuck them now;

The reason the GOP had such a hard time getting things done under Trump was because the GOP leadership hated his guts and did everything they could to sabotage him unless it was something they wanted like tax cuts or Supreme Court picks.

Same reason for the democrats now. The GOP leadership helped them steal a election and here we are.

Get rid of the establishment Republicans and we will start seeing quite a lot get done.
 

History Learner

Well-known member
The reason the GOP had such a hard time getting things done under Trump was because the GOP leadership hated his guts and did everything they could to sabotage him unless it was something they wanted like tax cuts or Supreme Court picks.

Same reason for the democrats now. The GOP leadership helped them steal a election and here we are.

Get rid of the establishment Republicans and we will start seeing quite a lot get done.

It's pure copium, Trump has no problems with naming and shaming those who directly cross him. That he didn't leads to the inevitable conclusion he is either a coward, incompetent or, the actual answer, that he's complicit. If we accept the MAGA movement's claims today, he won a landslide victory (somehow) in 2020 and is the frontrunner in GOP politics going into 2024; there is no excuse he was constrained by the "GOP Establishment" with this claimed level of popular support.
 

Bigking321

Well-known member
That he didn't leads to the inevitable conclusion he is either a coward, incompetent or, the actual answer, that he's complicit.

You serious?

He goes after Republican leadership all the time. He has a list of Republicans they are trying to primary out of office. Every other week or so he releases a statement calling Republicans out.

Are you not paying any attention?
 

History Learner

Well-known member
You serious?

He goes after Republican leadership all the time. He has a list of Republicans they are trying to primary out of office. Every other week or so he releases a statement calling Republicans out.

Are you not paying any attention?

Stop and read what you just said in the context of you previously stating Trump was constrained by the GOP establishment. It cannot logically be both, dude.
 

Bigking321

Well-known member
Stop and read what you just said in the context of you previously stating Trump was constrained by the GOP establishment. It cannot logically be both, dude.

What on earth are you on about?

You said the gop didn't get much done under Trump.

I said that was because the gop leadership hated Trump and did what they could to oppose him.

You said that was cope because otherwise Trump would go after the leadership.

I said he does go after the leadership all the time.

Then you said that doesn't make sense.

I feel that I'm responding coherently to your points but I'm not sure why you think I'm not.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Top