Alternate History Ideas and Discussion

WolfBear

Well-known member
Let's explore another bit of AU: What would a world with a real life Wakanda, an African collection of tribes getting their hands on Vibranium, look like?

Given that they sat on their hands for hundreds of years while Africa got fucked over by Europe, they'd be hated by the entire continent.

Would Wakandans really car about what Sub-Saharan Africans think of them when Sub-Saharan Africans can't build and maintain advanced civilizations like Wakandans can?
 

Zyobot

Just a time-traveling robot stranded on Earth.
Also, FWIW, China nowadays isn't exactly lacking in culture:



Looks interesting, though I don't think it's appropriate to shoehorn current events into this space. ;)



Anyway: 'Mercantile Rome, Militant Carthage'.

That is, Rome is founded as a merchant republic mainly concerned with profitable trade and commerce, while Carthage is highly militaristic and conquest-driven when it comes to dealing with foreign powers — thereby swapping the OTL "niches" of the two great rivals of the Med.
 

WolfBear

Well-known member
Looks interesting, though I don't think it's appropriate to shoehorn current events into this space. ;)



Anyway: 'Mercantile Rome, Militant Carthage'.

That is, Rome is founded as a merchant republic mainly concerned with profitable trade and commerce, while Carthage is more militaristic and conquest-driven when it comes to dealing with foreign powers — thereby swapping the OTL "niches" of the two great rivals of the Med.

Just have Italians go wimpy a couple of millenniums earlier LOL! ;) Italians in the World Wars, especially in WWII, have shown themselves to be rather wimpy, after all. There's even a joke about it in the anime Hetalia:

 

Zyobot

Just a time-traveling robot stranded on Earth.
Just have Italians go wimpy a couple of millenniums earlier LOL! ;) Italians in the World Wars, especially in WWII, have shown themselves to be rather wimpy, after all. There's even a joke about it in the anime Hetalia:


Probably not appropriate to shoehorn non-AH jokes here, either.

Just saying. :sneaky:
 

WolfBear

Well-known member
Fair enough. Anyway:

'AHC: A Russian Anatolia'

From a Russian perspective, was it possible to ever get a better Sykes-Picot deal where the territory in the Anatolian interior that's marked in gray/very dark blue/black here would also be assigned to Russia?


dekh82n-4fdc84dd-7f95-416c-baa4-33a6212e77b9.png
 

Atarlost

Well-known member
Dunno if Japanese rule would be too much better, exactly. Sure, they never drafted a Final Solution equivalent for the entire Asia-Pacific, but being less genocidally ambitious than the Nazis is a pretty easy bar to clear and doesn't offer much promise for period of sane, enlightened rule under Japanese occupation.
Yeah, but the alternative isn't sane, enlightened rule. It's Mao. Even the putative "Japanese Hitler" might have trouble out-doing Mao simply because he wouldn't be able to mobilize the Chinese against themselves and Japan's manpower is much more limited.

My expectation would be that by the late 20th century Japanese militarism would recede. If I had to throw a number at the wall I'd say about as long as it took the USSR to collapse. Occupying China is going to take enough manpower to cause war fatigue even if they aren't shooting and being shot at. Eventually they're going to start using Chinese police and administrators and their government of China is going to wind up about as Japanese as the late Yuan dynasty was Mongolian.
 

Zyobot

Just a time-traveling robot stranded on Earth.
Yeah, but the alternative isn't sane, enlightened rule. It's Mao. Even the putative "Japanese Hitler" might have trouble out-doing Mao simply because he wouldn't be able to mobilize the Chinese against themselves and Japan's manpower is much more limited.

My expectation would be that by the late 20th century Japanese militarism would recede. If I had to throw a number at the wall I'd say about as long as it took the USSR to collapse. Occupying China is going to take enough manpower to cause war fatigue even if they aren't shooting and being shot at. Eventually they're going to start using Chinese police and administrators and their government of China is going to wind up about as Japanese as the late Yuan dynasty was Mongolian.

I already alluded to Mao and the CCP potentially being worse for China than Imperial Japan, yes.

Quoting myself again:

On the other hand... the fact we're comparing CCP rule to Imperial Japan is still a damning indictment of the former's track record. For one, if you have a regime that kills more of its own people and inflicts more long-term structural damage on its own nation than freakin' Imperial Japan did, it's safe to say your regime is pretty goddamned shit. :(
 

WolfBear

Well-known member
Yeah, but the alternative isn't sane, enlightened rule. It's Mao. Even the putative "Japanese Hitler" might have trouble out-doing Mao simply because he wouldn't be able to mobilize the Chinese against themselves and Japan's manpower is much more limited.

My expectation would be that by the late 20th century Japanese militarism would recede. If I had to throw a number at the wall I'd say about as long as it took the USSR to collapse. Occupying China is going to take enough manpower to cause war fatigue even if they aren't shooting and being shot at. Eventually they're going to start using Chinese police and administrators and their government of China is going to wind up about as Japanese as the late Yuan dynasty was Mongolian.

If anything, China/Chinese might even use its/their numerical advantage to dominate the entire Japanese Empire in the long(er)-run in this TL, not just China itself! That would be a real China-wank TL lol! :D
 
Last edited:

WolfBear

Well-known member
If anything, China/Chinese might even use its/their numerical advantage to dominate the entire Japanese Empire in the long(er)-run in this TL, not just China itself! That would be a real China-wank TL lol! :D

So, basically, the Japanese Empire would eventually become just a Greater China lol, similar to how the Eurasian Union was meant to be a Greater Russia. (And indeed how the Soviet Union actually was a Greater Russia in real life.)

'WI: No Bolshevik-Menshevik split'

@TheRomanSlayer
 

Zyobot

Just a time-traveling robot stranded on Earth.
Based on this AH.com thread: '1980s People React To YouTube'.

That is, YouTube becomes available on downtimers' TV sets, which they can then navigate using the joystick-like controls and QWERTY keyboards the ROB's plugged in for them.
 

TheRomanSlayer

Kayabangan, Dugo, at Dangal
The RSDLP remains a large, but internally divided party.

I'm not sure how the Bolsheviks and Mensheviks ended up splitting, considering that they both had similar aims of bringing a socialist like government in Russia in the first place.
 

WolfBear

Well-known member
Based on this AH.com thread: '1980s People React To YouTube'.

That is, YouTube becomes available on downtimers' TV sets, which they can then navigate using the joystick-like controls and QWERTY keyboards the ROB's plugged in for them.

They'd probably find the same-sex marriage and kissing scenes repulsive, unfortunately. :( Or at least a lot of them. :(

The RSDLP remains a large, but internally divided party.

I'm not sure how the Bolsheviks and Mensheviks ended up splitting, considering that they both had similar aims of bringing a socialist like government in Russia in the first place.

Maybe the Bolsheviks were much more totalitarian?
 

Zyobot

Just a time-traveling robot stranded on Earth.
They'd probably find the same-sex marriage and kissing scenes repulsive, unfortunately. :( Or at least a lot of them. :(

*Eyes all the Pride Month ads suspiciously.* :oops:

Honestly, you're probably not wrong, though something tells me they'd take transgender stuff or drag-queen story hour even less well and put a preemptive stop to them. Reagan would make a point about snuffing them out, I think, whether on the campaign trail (if it happens in 1980) or as president (1981 onwards).

Granted, I'm equally sure Carter and other socially conservative Democrats would hate those, too, and have the DNC clamp down on the more "libertine" wing that went to Woodstock and backed McGovern '72 real fast.
 
Last edited:

WolfBear

Well-known member
*Eyes all the Pride Month ads suspiciously.* :oops:

Honestly, you're probably not wrong, though something tells me they'd take transgender stuff or drag-queen story hour even less well and put a preemptive stop to them. Reagan would make a point about snuffing them out, I think, whether on the campaign trail (if it happens in 1980) or as president (1981 onwards).

Granted, I'm equally sure Carter and other socially conservative Democrats would hate those, too, and have the DNC clamp down on the more "libertine" wing that went to Woodstock and backed McGovern '72 real fast.

Agreed. Though I wonder how'd they react to trans lesbians since they could already get around same-sex marriage ban prohibitions back then by refusing to change their legal sex and thus having their marriages be formally be between a man and a woman if they married a cisgender woman.
 

Zyobot

Just a time-traveling robot stranded on Earth.
Agreed. Though I wonder how'd they react to trans lesbians since they could already get around same-sex marriage ban prohibitions back then by refusing to change their legal sex and thus having their marriages be formally be between a man and a woman if they married a cisgender woman.

Lawmakers would find time in their busy schedules to close those loopholes — just a hunch. ;)

But anyway, any more thoughts besides uproar over gender and sexual issues? Because honestly, out of all the ramifications YouTube in the Eighties would have... surely, Pride Parades and transgenderism aren't the be-all, end-all or worth solely fixating on here.
 

WolfBear

Well-known member
Lawmakers would find time in their busy schedules to close those loopholes — just a hunch. ;)

But anyway, any more thoughts besides uproar over gender and sexual issues? Because honestly, out of all the ramifications YouTube in the Eighties would have... surely, Pride Parades and transgenderism aren't the be-all, end-all or worth solely fixating on here.

The Jackass could presumably become much popular earlier? ;) :D :p
 

ATP

Well-known member
Dunno if Japanese rule would be too much better, exactly. Sure, they never drafted a Final Solution equivalent for the entire Asia-Pacific, but being less genocidally ambitious than the Nazis is a pretty easy bar to clear and doesn't offer much promise for period of sane, enlightened rule under Japanese occupation.

On the other hand... the fact we're comparing CCP rule to Imperial Japan is still a damning indictment of the former's track record. For one, if you have a regime that kills more of its own people and inflicts more long-term structural damage on its own nation than freakin' Imperial Japan did, it's safe to say your regime is pretty goddamned shit. :(

It would be better,becouse japaneese never tried to destroy chineese society.Mao kill it when he first destroyed their culture/Japan could stole part of it,but not destroy all/ and later made sons kill their own fathers in the name of revolution.
Sometimes even eat them later.
China was made on cult of ancestors - killing your own father is something which made you not-chineese.
Japan could kill the same number,but not turn survivors into mosnters.
 

Zyobot

Just a time-traveling robot stranded on Earth.
The Jackass could presumably become much popular earlier? ;) :D :p

I was thinking reactions to how big computers became, the breakup of the USSR, and that we had a black and orange president back to back. You know, things that’d be hard for a general audience to miss within an hour or two of browsing. :sneaky:
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Top