Agent23
Ни шагу назад!
Conservative homos don't look like pedo soyboys?
Conservative homos don't look like pedo soyboys?
Okay, so... they're wearing suits? One of them is even wearing his suit over a t-shirt, and they both have the rat-face soy stubble.Conservative homos don't look like pedo soyboys?
How are they "denying" anyone anything?Okay, so... they're wearing suits? One of them is even wearing his suit over a t-shirt, and they both have the rat-face soy stubble.
And, ya know, they're hiring women to bear children they won't raise, denying them children and denying their children their mother, so the homos can drag out their pervert fantasy of being married to the N'th degree.
They could look like gigachad and it wouldn't matter.
And, ya know, they're hiring women to bear children they won't raise, denying them children and denying their children their mother, so the homos can drag out their pervert fantasy of being married to the N'th degree.
It's the first.So, are you phrasing your objection to those in the most offensive terms you can get away with in order to poison the well by framing the opposition to this in terms no decent person would use, or are you one-upping that and actively trying to rally support for Rubin by inspiring everyone else to support them just to piss you off?
Let's try the third option:So, are you phrasing your objection to those in the most offensive terms you can get away with in order to poison the well by framing the opposition to this in terms no decent person would use, or are you one-upping that and actively trying to rally support for Rubin by inspiring everyone else to support them just to piss you off?
Let's try the third option:
This is a disgusting perversion of human nature, two males pretending to be married and dragging innocent children into their immorality play as props, at the price of those children not being cared for by their mothers and their mothers enduring the challenges of pregnancy without a child. I describe it as disgusting because it is. Because of your own failings, you insist on trying to re-frame it as "using offensive terms" so you can play the victim.
The victims are the children being used as props by narcissists.
Making excuses for perversion is counter-productive; the effective range of the excuses is precisely zero meters. No one who is Christian or conservative can have credibility outside of their own mind if they do not stand decisively against such obvious deviations from nature and tradition.It is not playing the victim to suggest that your arguements are so counter productive that they make more sense as an attempt to support Rubin by sabotaging the opposing viewpoint, since you're tying anti-Rubin sentiment to you and your absurd rhetoric.
It's just saying you suck at making any sort of anti-Rubin statement and would be better off if you just shut up.
You are not a hard-line nationalist, you are a white supremacist parasite who is trying to hijack the populist Right to your retarded 'RETVRN' agenda, just like that jackass Feuntes.Making excuses for perversion is counter-productive; the effective range of the excuses is precisely zero meters. No one who is Christian or conservative can have credibility outside of their own mind if they do not stand decisively against such obvious deviations from nature and tradition.
WTF are you even conserving, then? It's issues like this that expose why hard-line nationalists such as myself are gaining ground among the next generation, because while we may be pricks, we aren't assholes who are full of shit. When we say "X is wrong" it's not "um, uh, I meant, you know, until someone influential and popular does X", it's straight up "X is wrong".
I mean... it's a whole lotta things.Gonna be honest... I don't see how it's any morally worse than adoption...
Also, not sure if done because they really want the blood connection... or if it's just more evidence that America's Adoption process is borked.
I am indeed a hard-line nationalist, if you have trouble with that consult a dictionary.You are not a hard-line nationalist, you are a white supremacist parasite who is trying to hijack the populist Right to your retarded 'RETVRN' agenda, just like that jackass Feuntes.
It's issues like this that expose why hard-line nationalists such as myself are gaining ground among the next generation
When we say "X is wrong" it's not "um, uh, I meant, you know, until someone influential and popular does X", it's straight up "X is wrong".
Rubin is pretty cool, I'd imagine a lot of people on here enjoy his stuff.So, are you phrasing your objection to those in the most offensive terms you can get away with in order to poison the well by framing the opposition to this in terms no decent person would use, or are you one-upping that and actively trying to rally support for Rubin by inspiring everyone else to support them just to piss you off?
In theory, with a perfect understanding of our genetics, that last point could be true... but we don't have that. With dogs and horses and other lesser animals, their owners take risks to see what they can achieve through animal husbandry, and some of those attempts turn out quite poorly. Even the results the breeders approve of are sometimes lousy for the animals themselves. With humans we should be slower to do such things, and should not assume we know precisely what we are breeding in... or out.How are they "denying" anyone anything?
I mean frankly traditional families probably work best because that is the default we have evolved around, but Dave probably wouldn't have had any kids if not for this, and those are two more tax payers and workers that can alleviate the crisis of sub-replacement birthrates we have in the west.
Also, they could just find a willing surrogate that doesn't want babies yet, find a first class Asian beauty queen/math wiz 20-something that doesn't want children at this point in life to provide ova, and get babies with above average genetics.
This type of financial arrangement could, in theory produce higher quality offspring than normal human breeding.
...Why is the Catholic Church the final moral Arbiter?I mean... it's a whole lotta things.
IVF is... controversial at best, a sin at worst.
Playing up the "marriage" of homosexual couples is definitely a problem.
Claiming to be a conservative but hypocritically living by the moral standards of liberals is... let's just go with wrong.
Using a child to make a political point is scummy as fuck.
Surrogacy is... I actually, don't quite know what the traditional Catholic stance is on that. I... think... it's probably verboten for the same reason as IVF.
Adoption is not even on the same spectrum morally as this.
American adoption system is pretty fucked though.
Yeah, this is accurate as per catholic doctrine, but 4 points:I mean... it's a whole lotta things.
IVF is... controversial at best, a sin at worst.
Playing up the "marriage" of homosexual couples is definitely a problem.
Claiming to be a conservative but hypocritically living by the moral standards of liberals is... let's just go with wrong.
Using a child to make a political point is scummy as fuck.
Surrogacy is... I actually, don't quite know what the traditional Catholic stance is on that. I... think... it's probably verboten for the same reason as IVF.
Adoption is not even on the same spectrum morally as this.
American adoption system is pretty fucked though.
It isn't? I'm not sure where you got that from my explanation. It's just the traditionalist school I am most familiar with....Why is the Catholic Church the final moral Arbiter?
EDIT: I'd like to once more point out, Sodom and Gomorrah wasn't about the gay, or the public sex, it was about the rape, and the breaching of hospitality.
I know literally nothing about the man though if he sells himself to the conservative base then I'd assume he believes he is conservative.Yeah, this is accurate as per catholic doctrine, but 4 points:
I don't think he ever claimed to be conservative.
Rubin is ethnically jewish (not sure if he believes) and so is using a different calculation entirely. I have no idea what the Jewish POV on this is.
He's not using this to make a political statement, more just announcing additions to the family.
And surrogacy is at least one wrong no matter how you slice (at basically IVF levels) it in Catholicism, unless it's just a planned adoption from one married couple to another married couple, then IDK.