NATO Military News

ATP

Well-known member
you are now a vassal state of the Big Gay Empire
Sadly,true.Whe we must be ruled either by traitors like Tusk,or idiots like Kaczyński? Why we could not have normal leaders,like Trump or Orban? WHY? PER KE ? /i tried italian - and probably failed.But,in italian it sound better then polish !/
 

Poe

Well-known member
Well, Ukraine did demonstrate the product's viability versus weapons such as Russia's, ah, "super missiles", haha.

With Russia being a bunch of dickbags, China getting more brazen with their new yet aging hardware, and Iran starting to piss off countries across the world by supporting Water Rat Piracy, Lockheed are probably sensing a business opportunity in addition to keeping up required stockpiles for US and NATO military use. shrug
I don't care the reason, really. The faster we can invalidate the constant mocking from BRICs shills about China's missile production a day etc the happier I'll be.
Sadly,true.Whe we must be ruled either by traitors like Tusk,or idiots like Kaczyński? Why we could not have normal leaders,like Trump or Orban? WHY? PER KE ? /i tried italian - and probably failed.But,in italian it sound better then polish !/
I'd make a joke about the intelligence of poles here, but I'm American and we haven't had good politicians since the founders died off so there's not much room to talk.
 

Husky_Khan

The Dog Whistler... I mean Whisperer.
Founder
Apparently not spending money on basic military requirements for years is having a deleterious effect on basic military operations.



Poor Belgium, just waiting to get invaded again, though hopefully not by migrants.
 

IndyFront

Well-known member
Oh it's not just Belgium, Germany and Scandinavia have been having serious fucking problems with their fleets too

They would still kick Russia's ass, but that's mainly because of how militarily incompetent and corrupt the Russian Gov't are, not because the Euro militaries are actually good.
(Aside from France and UK, France is pretty scrappy and both it and the UK have nukes)
 

ATP

Well-known member
Poland military - we could not produce anything fast,becouse our manufacturies are in bad shape,and private manufactures practically could not be build in Poland.
New systems are arriwing slovly,and we do not have logistic for them - which mean,that we would depend on USA and South Korea here.
We buyed Apache helicopters,which would fail on modern battlefield.
Our ammo production is so bad,that we could not even rebuild what we send to Kiev - and,we produce only warheads and schells,but not powder for them.
we had 11 tank battalions,now we have 4.Maybe 6 after new tanks started coming.

Only Germany and France are better,but even they could only support one division they have.

In 1939 we lasted month,now it could be worst.
 

Marduk

Well-known member
Moderator
Staff Member
We buyed Apache helicopters,which would fail on modern battlefield.
Our ammo production is so bad,that we could not even rebuild what we send to Kiev - and,we produce only warheads and schells,but not powder for them.
we had 11 tank battalions,now we have 4.Maybe 6 after new tanks started coming.
Let's not forget one thing you produce in amount sufficient for a whole country. Bullshit.
As demonstrated here. You could supply whole NATO with it by yourself.
 

ATP

Well-known member
Let's not forget one thing you produce in amount sufficient for a whole country. Bullshit.
As demonstrated here. You could supply whole NATO with it by yourself.
Ha,Ha.Now tell me,how we should fight putin with 3-4 weak dyvisions without reserves and ammo for few weeks? with what? stones? ask palestinians,how well it go for them.

But don't you know Poland Master Race is stronk? :p
Well,we could become supermans and win,indeed.But,without becoming master race,we are doomed now.
Well,God and HIS HOLY MOTHER could save us - but it is only hope now.

And i certainly do not deserved miracle,only death.
 

Marduk

Well-known member
Moderator
Staff Member
Ha,Ha.Now tell me,how we should fight putin with 3-4 weak dyvisions without reserves and ammo for few weeks? with what? stones? ask palestinians,how well it go for them.
What is the point of even trying to explain it to you when you either don't know how many tanks are in a NATO battalion or have no idea how many tanks we have by a huge margin?
We have 5 battalions with spares of Leopard 2's alone. We have more than that in other tanks.
 

ATP

Well-known member
What is the point of even trying to explain it to you when you either don't know how many tanks are in a NATO battalion or have no idea how many tanks we have by a huge margin?
We have 5 battalions with spares of Leopard 2's alone. We have more than that in other tanks.
We have 231 Leopard 2 tanks,and we need 58 tanks for battalion.So,4 at best.Let assume,that that another 3 on PT91,one on Abrams,one on K2,
9 battalions - and,they would be out of ammo after few weeks.

Against soviets,who could deliver 80.000 fresh cannon fodder each month.

And do not forget,that germans are soviet allies,and current polish premier Tusk is their tool.
 

Marduk

Well-known member
Moderator
Staff Member
We have 231 Leopard 2 tanks,and we need 58 tanks for battalion.So,4 at best.Let assume,that that another 3 on PT91,one on Abrams,one on K2,
I specifically asked about NATO, not our mess.
German standard is 44.
US standard is 36.
Russian standard is 27.
UK has 56 and calls it a regiment, with a third being reserve. Whole UK has 3 regiments.
Italian standard is 41 also in regiments.


Poland has a very highballed number, so it's convenient for your whining to go around saying how few battalions are there, but in tank numbers that's not valid to compare to anyone else's battalions, each is about half more tanks than what most countries call a tank battalion, and over twice as many tanks as a Russian one.
9 battalions - and,they would be out of ammo after few weeks.
Either you are talking bullshit again or spreading classified information on the internet.
 

ATP

Well-known member
I specifically asked about NATO, not our mess.
German standard is 44.
US standard is 36.
Russian standard is 27.
UK has 56 and calls it a regiment, with a third being reserve. Whole UK has 3 regiments.
Italian standard is 41 also in regiments.


Poland has a very highballed number, so it's convenient for your whining to go around saying how few battalions are there, but in tank numbers that's not valid to compare to anyone else's battalions, each is about half more tanks than what most countries call a tank battalion, and over twice as many tanks as a Russian one.
We are taking about polish army,not soviet.
Either you are talking bullshit again or spreading classified information on the internet.
Sigh.Putin friend is premier now.Soviets knew everything.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Top