Breaking News Time Magazine openly admits to a bi-partisan, elite lead rigging ("fortifying") of the election

LordsFire

Internet Wizard
BULLSHIT. This is literally an admission of TREASON!

It is in spirit, but most of it likely is not an admission by the technical letter of the law.

That doesn't change that this is a blatant attempt to control people, and turn elections into a farce and sham.

There were still a number of changes to election procedure made that I have yet to see any proof of actually being legal though.
 

Airedale260

Well-known member
Yeah I agree, there's nothing actionable in the Times article. Partisan as heck to say they needed extra groups of people to offset the "pressure" from Republican observers but that's not the same as admitting they forged votes which is what people are acting like the article says.

Translation: They barely won because Trump and those who lean right or populist have a much broader base of support than those who lean left/establishment.

And I’m sure this is to deliberately have attention focused on continuing arguments over the election as opposed to things like Biden’s idiocy over the budget, or the fact that Hunter has yet to divest himself of Chinese-controlled holdings like was promised in December, or the fact that the White House is ignoring the CDC’s official recommendations over reopening schools because it’s upsetting the teachers’ unions...etc.
 

Terthna

Professional Lurker
Translation: They barely won because Trump and those who lean right or populist have a much broader base of support than those who lean left/establishment.

And I’m sure this is to deliberately have attention focused on continuing arguments over the election as opposed to things like Biden’s idiocy over the budget, or the fact that Hunter has yet to divest himself of Chinese-controlled holdings like was promised in December, or the fact that the White House is ignoring the CDC’s official recommendations over reopening schools because it’s upsetting the teachers’ unions...etc.
You're sure huh? You think this has nothing to do with building a narrative before The Gateway Pundit released their evidence of fraud? What is it going to take to convince you people that the election was fraudulent?
 

Terthna

Professional Lurker


been waiting to use this clip

The weird thing about that skit though is that it's about Chappelle defending people he liked; people like Airedale260 profess to be in opposition to the Democrats. One would think he'd be chomping at the bit for any excuse to deligitimize their victories; instead, he's defending them. Basically going "they're evil, but they're not that evil; they wouldn't just not play by the rules. That would be against the rules."

It's like someone out of Yugioh, who just can't grok that someone might, when they challenge them to a battle that will decide the fate of the world, simply pull out a gun instead of a card deck.
 

Vaermina

Well-known member
It should certainly be investigated since it backs up previous things claimed.

But it might not have been illegal.
 

ShieldWife

Marchioness
It doesn’t really matter if it’s illegal does it? Who would investigate? The FBI? A special prosecutor appointed by Biden? There is no one with authority who will help, the foxes are the only guards that the henhouse has. They can admit to any wrong doing they like and no one can do anything about it.

Our democracy is finished just like our rule of law.
 

Rocinante

Russian Bot
Founder
It doesn’t really matter if it’s illegal does it? Who would investigate? The FBI? A special prosecutor appointed by Biden? There is no one with authority who will help, the foxes are the only guards that the henhouse has. They can admit to any wrong doing they like and no one can do anything about it.

Our democracy is finished just like our rule of law.
Yep. Here it is. On video. And no one will do a thing about it.

I was saying at one point "well you'd need clear video proof to convince some people to get anything done"

Well here it is..and some people are still not convinced after seeing that video. Nothing will happen.
 

Vaermina

Well-known member
Wasn't the deadline 8pm?

3:30am is after 8pm.

Or is this just some "regulation" instead of a law?
The deadline was, I assume, for new in person ballots, the ballots brought in via that truck could have been mail in ballots being brought to that place to be counted.

Assuming so, the big problem is probably chain of custody verification.
 

Jormungandr

The Midgard Wyrm
Founder
What I found interesting was the basic admittance that antifia and blm really are their stormtroopers who they can order onto and off the street.
"Oh, you can't say that! That's a CONSPIRACY THEORY!" /Google/Facebook/Twitter/NPC/Leftard.

We've known that since the start, to be honest. They're the Democrats' Brownshirts-in-role, and cats paws until they're disposed of by Biden and his regime.

Anyway, yeah: the videos mentioned are what cinched it for me -- Democrats won by fraud. Nothing legally or from the establishment will come of it though, since they're all in on it and are in the Democrats' pockets. People are now so hell-bent on denying that electoral fraud occurred, you could drown them in a septic tank and they'd still be denying "water is wet" until their last breath.
 

Airedale260

Well-known member
The weird thing about that skit though is that it's about Chappelle defending people he liked; people like Airedale260 profess to be in opposition to the Democrats. One would think he'd be chomping at the bit for any excuse to deligitimize their victories; instead, he's defending them. Basically going "they're evil, but they're not that evil; they wouldn't just not play by the rules. That would be against the rules."

It's like someone out of Yugioh, who just can't grok that someone might, when they challenge them to a battle that will decide the fate of the world, simply pull out a gun instead of a card deck.

Hey, @Terthna if you're going to talk about me, at least have the courtesy to say it to my face rather than behind my back. All you have to do is add an @ before my username.

So, here's the thing. Gateway Pundit is a bullshit website and I really doubt Time gives any credibility to them. If it were, say, TMZ, then you'd have a point. Yes, TMZ the entertainment news thing, that also has a reputation for asking difficult questions when nobody else does (like with Clinton and the Clinton Foundation, etc). So, no, I really don't think Time is doing this other than to screw with gullible individuals like you, and keep you focusing your fire on people like me, who have a low-to-nonexistent level of bullshit tolerance and who are just as committed to opposing Biden and the Democrats. Seriously, when was the last time you ever got involved in opposing their policies? What's that? You only write screeds on the internet instead of actually participating in things?

I am only on here because I don't want people listening to your idiocy unopposed, whereas you just want an echo chamber to justify your smugness when you don't do jack in the real world. And also unlike you, I have no problem saying this to your metaphorical face.

Seriously, go find a group, not even a political party, but a charitable organization that helps with stuff you believe in, be it the Red Cross, the Salvation Army, the Knights of Columbus, the Masons, or whatever. Get involved and see how the real world works, and how you actually *can* make a difference instead of being a keyboard jockey.
 

Rocinante

Russian Bot
Founder
Hey, @Terthna if you're going to talk about me, at least have the courtesy to say it to my face rather than behind my back. All you have to do is add an @ before my username.

So, here's the thing. Gateway Pundit is a bullshit website and I really doubt Time gives any credibility to them. If it were, say, TMZ, then you'd have a point. Yes, TMZ the entertainment news thing, that also has a reputation for asking difficult questions when nobody else does (like with Clinton and the Clinton Foundation, etc). So, no, I really don't think Time is doing this other than to screw with gullible individuals like you, and keep you focusing your fire on people like me, who have a low-to-nonexistent level of bullshit tolerance and who are just as committed to opposing Biden and the Democrats. Seriously, when was the last time you ever got involved in opposing their policies? What's that? You only write screeds on the internet instead of actually participating in things?

I am only on here because I don't want people listening to your idiocy unopposed, whereas you just want an echo chamber to justify your smugness when you don't do jack in the real world. And also unlike you, I have no problem saying this to your metaphorical face.

Seriously, go find a group, not even a political party, but a charitable organization that helps with stuff you believe in, be it the Red Cross, the Salvation Army, the Knights of Columbus, the Masons, or whatever. Get involved and see how the real world works, and how you actually *can* make a difference instead of being a keyboard jockey.
Are you going to even attempt to debunk that video with anything other than "gAtEwAY pUNdiT iS BuLlShIT gUyS!"

Seriously. It's a video of a van showing up at 3:30 am with tens of thousands of ballots, just like the affidavits claimed.

You're STILL denying it? You are adding nothing of substance. "Drrruuurrr gateway pundit is bullshit lol go join a community"

How about you either contribute to the thread or leave? Got any evidence that this video is bullshit?
 
Last edited:

Airedale260

Well-known member
Are you going to even attempt to debunk that video with anything other than "gAtEwAY pUNdiT iS BuLlShIT gUyS!"

Seriously. It's a video of a van showing up at 3:30 am with tens of thousands of ballots, just like the afidavits claimed.

You're STILL denying it? You are adding nothing of substance. "Drrruuurrr gateway pundit is bullshit lol go join a community"

How about you either contribute to the thread or leave? Got any evidence that this video is bullshit?

No problem, ask and ye shall receive:




See, unlike when I ask for cites for claims, I actually *back them up*. I've repeatedly asked for proof of these from more than one source and all I get are crickets, then see more posts regurgitating the same claims before I make a request and get ignored again.

So...got anything else other than some hilariously shoddy work that got looked over and dismissed as trash by everyone with any actual knowledge of how these things work? Oh, sorry, of course they're all "sheeple" or "deep state actors," right?
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Top