King Arts
Well-known member
Well gotta respect that they aren’t hypocrites and are opposed to the draft.So typical feminist claptrap. Got it.
Well gotta respect that they aren’t hypocrites and are opposed to the draft.So typical feminist claptrap. Got it.
Except that'd cause a further rise in baby-trappings, "oopsie babies", and single mothers. It'd be a great way to fuck men over even further than they are now in the courts and in society.there was a reason most women opposed getting the right to vote until weak men agreed to hand over the benefits without the duties. Ian Crossland on Timcast made a hilarious recommendation the other day that I think would be fun. men get their vote when they sign up for the selective service. women get theirs when they have a kid. if nothing else birth rate crisis averted I guess. Ian has turned surprisingly based since he started working out. still weird though.
I think single motherhood should be legislated against. So even if a girl does have an ooosie baby the man is forced to marry her. That would increase the birth rate and also cut down on fornication.Except that'd cause a further rise in baby-trappings, "oopsie babies", and single mothers. It'd be a great way to fuck men over even further than they are now in the courts and in society.
We need less of this, not an incentive for more of it.
That would lead to a drastic increase in domestic violence at best, and one in homicides at worst.I think single motherhood should be legislated against. So even if a girl does have an ooosie baby the man is forced to marry her. That would increase the birth rate and also cut down on fornication.
It also should not be legislated for, as it is partial contribution to the cultural mess we are in.I think single motherhood should be legislated against. So even if a girl does have an ooosie baby the man is forced to marry her. That would increase the birth rate and also cut down on fornication.
It also should not be legislated for, as it is partial contribution to the cultural mess we are in.
It's also beyond any sort of Overton window to force any people to marry, we're not fucking Pakistan or something like that. It would cut down on fornication, further lower birth rate and other relationship stats due to the risk of being forced into marriage, and raise crime statistics.
The surprise problem with modern legal systems being good at cracking down on deadbeats is that it was a big, first step in undermining the whole purpose of marriage and all the fallout of that. After all one of, if not the main purpose of marriage for a woman traditionally was to make sure a man provides for her and presumably his children, but if the state will force the man to provide for them anyway even without marriage, sometimes even with requiring less of the other side, that seriously undermines the purpose of marriage.
This imbalance should be countered, not reinforced with even more draconian measures.
I want to keep no-fault divorce, but I think that by definition, since there is "no fault," it should be a clean break with no alimony or child support.
Honestly, the simplest solution is to just delete the laws that broke the system in the first place
Delete alimony.
Delete child support.
Delete assumed parenthood for children who are not yours
Delete govt funds going towards single mothers.
Delete the laws that give an unemployeed couple with a child MORE money if the woman kicks the man out and becomes a single mom
Delete no fault divorce
Suddenly magically women will want a husband because daddy govt isn't giving them checks every month anymore. (whether it comes from taxpayer money or from the govt robbing a single man to give them)
What if the woman is a widow? Her husband dying through accident, combat or something else other than foul play?The quickest way to get rid of single motherhood is to stop supporting it.
Just put in a law that single family households are no longer allowed to get any form of welfare. After a couple painful years this problem would mostly be fixed.
What a graceful reaction.So typical feminist claptrap. Got it.
Feminism/media versus reality.![]()
then she canWhat if the woman is a widow? Her husband dying through accident, combat or something else other than foul play?
No, the "grapples" and "throws" were also acted out.Amusingly, they actually did the grapples and throws for the first part, the second part is clearly stage-punches on both sides, well timed and executed stage punches, but stage punches nonetheless.
We don't live in Somalia or Haiti, those are extra rare situations in first world countries.What if the woman is a widow? Her husband dying through accident, combat or something else other than foul play?