DarthOne
☦️
this is going to backfire hard they got so used to having a friendly media they forgot how to hide their corruption.
They still do.
this is going to backfire hard they got so used to having a friendly media they forgot how to hide their corruption.
Harvard Law School Professor and Constitutional lawyer Alan Dershowitz joined Sean Hannity on Tuesday along with Gregg Jarrett to discuss the current Alvin Bragg lawfare case in New York City against President Donald Trump.
Jury selection continued on Tuesday morning for Manhattan DA Alvin Bragg's lawfare case against Trump related to 'hush payments' made to porn star Stormy Daniels. Last April Trump was hit with 34 felony counts of falsifying business records and conspiracy. The charges are unprecedented and illogical.
Alvin Bragg still hasn't named the underlying felony after he twisted the law and somehow upgraded the misdemeanor charges that were past the statute of limitations – to felonies.
The fix is in. The judge overseeing the case is a far-left operative whose daughter has made a lucrative career helping Democrats 'get Trump' and is currently profiting from the case.
After refusing to recuse himself, Judge Juan Merchan on Monday threatened to put President Trump in jail if he doesn't show up for trial.
On Monday, the Marxist tyrannical judge told President Trump that he could be thrown in prison if he did not show up each day in court. This is a clear constitutional violation.
Judge Merchan even warned President Trump about attending his son's high school graduation. This is typical behavior from soulless Marxists as we are quickly learning in America today.
On Tuesday Alan Dershowtiz called on Trump's attorneys to IMMEDIATELY file a motion and challenge Judge Merchan's clearly unconstitutional court orders gagging President Trump and refusing to allow him to campaign or attend his son's graduation.
This is opening a huge easily appealed situation
It will because there are even liberal judges who will go with the truth and the facts over feelingsGood Lord, you are naïve if you think that will happen.
It will because there are even liberal judges who will go with the truth and the facts over feelings
Not for Orange Man.
...how on earth have you reached the 'I don't care' conclusion?Then leave the fucking country and shut the fuck up about something you clearly don't care about.
I mean, there are still plenty of judges who uphold the law over ideals.Not for Orange Man.
...how on earth have you reached the 'I don't care' conclusion?
Then leave the fucking country and shut the fuck up about something you clearly don't care about.
Jesus, did your mom make the nuggies a little cold this morning or something?Your literal endless bitching.
So bitching about something means people DON'T care?Your literal endless bitching.
How many years after the fact?This is opening a huge easily appealed situation
So bitching about something means people DON'T care?
Nah. Darth has a good point. Trump is getting fucked in these legal situations. The law isn't being handled in a fair and just way, and expecting that it suddenly will is being pretty optimistic.
It's just people doodling and gloomingYeah, see, except that the appeals courts are already ruling in his favor. Repeatedly so. Even in New York.
Really why?This is opening a huge easily appealed situation
The jury selection and any kind of unbiased jury of his peersReally why?
At the beginning of EVERY criminal case the accused is required to be present during proceedings. The Supreme Court has ruled at least 3 times on this very matter.
Rule 43. Defendant's Presence
The purpose of which is in part to protect the defendant.
(So that they cannot be tried in absentia, and have the clear right to confront their accuser)
beginning, not the entire thingReally why?
At the beginning of EVERY criminal case the accused is required to be present during proceedings. The Supreme Court has ruled at least 3 times on this very matter.
Rule 43. Defendant's Presence
The purpose of which is in part to protect the defendant.
(So that they cannot be tried in absentia, and have the clear right to confront their accuser)