I didn't say there was "no fraud", I said it hadn't been proven that the entire election was fraudulent. This that whole disingenuous debating thing I was talking about. "We presented a bunch of random 'evidence' and made no further move to actually advance our position, clearly we are right".
Also, the fact the dems oppose it proves nothing. Democrats have been opposing republican proposals purely on the basis of them being republican proposals for years now.
I've seen one video of the cops moving one "barricade", located well outside of the capital building. A barricade that was waist high and totally insufficient to hold back a mob, so keeping in place was littlerally pointless.
There is a vast gulf between that, and your claim of the cops inviting them in to the capital itself, where the cops then suddenly changed their minds, barricaded everything, and then shoot a women.
That actually undermines your point. Yes, in theory a small number of liberal activist could prod a mob into taking action. But so could a small number of right wing activists. The "libs made them do it" theory implicitly assumes that had these liberal activists (who's actions during the riot are largely unknown, I must add) not acted, that no one else of any other political persuasion woyld have done anything to set things in motion either. That does not seem plausible.
Also, it's generally very hard to prod a mob into action unless it's been ruled up, which for a crowd like this would require something considerable. Like, say, an address from a famous and well know figure they all respected inspiring them to take action and save the country.
