Military US Military Is Scared Americans Won't Fight For Globalism

Top Army official blames anti-woke rhetoric of right for severe recruiting crisis

Tl;dr



"Stop telling the truth that our military is lame & weak due to politicization designed to enslave it to a cabal that has nothing but contempt for actual traditional patriots (you know, the main recruiting pool for the best soldiers) and wants to wield it as a weapon with which to oppress said patriots, we can't get these hicks we hate so much to sign up now!"
Of course they hate the fact they are seen as woke, but they only have themselves and their leadership to blame for it; the Pentagon didn't become a Harvard Faculty Lounge by accident.

No amount of PR spin or spit and shine attempts by the military brass can fix or paper over the deep, deep divides their masters help create, and to which they are very much a party to.

The recruiting crisis is only a symptom of a deeper cultural rot that has been growing since...I'd say Enron started it, but 9/11 caused a small economic bush fire to become a conflagration that at first burned our enemies as we papered over issues at home with Patriotic fervor, but ended up burning our Constituion in it's flames when the elite could accept a loss to Trump in 2016 and then used a fuck up by the CCP in an election year to steal an election.

We are a banana republic now that exports Hollywood, Raytheon, and McD's; anyone who signs up now or serves has to square that with themselves and accept we are just the least worst option, even if we are a banana republic.
 
Top Army official blames anti-woke rhetoric of right for severe recruiting crisis

Tl;dr



"Stop telling the truth that our military is lame & weak due to politicization designed to enslave it to a cabal that has nothing but contempt for actual traditional patriots (you know, the main recruiting pool for the best soldiers) and wants to wield it as a weapon with which to oppress said patriots, we can't get these hicks we hate so much to sign up now!"

Is this Wormmouth related to certain mister Wormtongue?
 
Top Army official blames anti-woke rhetoric of right for severe recruiting crisis

Tl;dr



"Stop telling the truth that our military is lame & weak due to politicization designed to enslave it to a cabal that has nothing but contempt for actual traditional patriots (you know, the main recruiting pool for the best soldiers) and wants to wield it as a weapon with which to oppress said patriots, we can't get these hicks we hate so much to sign up now!"
Well,they always could choose roman method - our citizen do not want become soldiers?
Hire barbarians we are fighting! what could go wrong?

Jokes aside - it worked for Rome and later ERE,till it stopped working.
But,at least,dudes who made such great decisions do not lived long enough to see fall...
 
Well,they always could choose roman method - our citizen do not want become soldiers?
Hire barbarians we are fighting! what could go wrong?

Jokes aside - it worked for Rome and later ERE,till it stopped working.
But,at least,dudes who made such great decisions do not lived long enough to see fall...
We already do.

US military offers legal migrants path to citizenship amid recruiting shortfall


When Esmita Spudes Bidari was a young girl in Nepal, she dreamed of being in the military, but that wasn't a real option in her country.

Last week, she raised her right hand and took the oath to join the US Army Reserves, thanks in part to a recruiter in Dallas who also is Nepalese and reached out to her through an online group.

Bidari, who heads to basic training in August, is just the latest in a growing number of legal migrants enlisting in the US military as it more aggressively seeks out immigrants, offering a fast track to citizenship to those who sign up.

Struggling to overcome recruiting shortfalls, the Army and the Air Force have bolstered their marketing to entice legal residents to enlist, putting out pamphlets, working social media and broadening their outreach, particularly in inner cities.

One key element is the use of recruiters with similar backgrounds to these potential recruits.

"It is one thing to hear about the military from locals here, but it is something else when it's from your fellow brother, from the country you're from," said Bidari, who was contacted by Army Staff Sgt. Kalden Lama, the Dallas recruiter, on a Facebook group that helps Nepalese people in America connect with one another. "That brother was in the group and he was recruiting and he told me about the military."

The military has had success in recruiting legal immigrants, particularly among those seeking a job, education benefits and training as well as a quick route to becoming an American citizen.

But they also require additional security screening and more help filling out forms, particularly those who are less proficient in English.

Both the Army and the Air Force say they will not meet their recruiting goals this year, and the Navy also expects to fall short.

Pulling more from the legal immigrant population may not provide large numbers, but any small boosts will help.

The Marine Corp is the only service on pace to meet its goal.

The shortfalls have led to a wide range of new recruiting programs, ad campaigns and other incentives to help the services compete with often higher-paying, less risky jobs in the private sector.

Defense leaders say young people are less familiar with the military, are drawn more to corporate jobs that provide similar education and other benefits, and want to avoid the risk of injury and death that service in defense of the United States could bring.

In addition, they say that little more than 20% meet the physical, mental and character requirements to join.

"We have large populations of legal US residents who are exceptionally patriotic, they're exceptionally grateful for the opportunities that this country has provided," said Air Force Maj. Gen. Ed Thomas, head of the service's recruiting command.

The biggest challenges have been identifying geographic pockets of immigrant populations, finding ways to reach them and helping any of those interested navigate the complex military recruiting applications and procedures.'

Last October, the Army reestablished a program for legal permanent residents to apply for accelerated naturalization once they get to basic training.

Recruiters began to reach out on social media, using short videos in various languages to target the top 10 countries that recruits had come from during the previous year.

The Air Force effort began this year, and the first group of 14 graduated from basic training and were sworn in as new citizens in April.

They included recruits from Cameroon, Jamaica, Kenya, the Philippines, Russia and South Africa. As of mid-May there were about 100 in basic training who had begun the citizenship process and about 40 who had completed it.

Thomas said the program required changes to Air Force policy, coordination with US Citizenship and Immigration Services and a careful screening process to ensure there are no security risks.

"We have to take exceptional measures to be able to thoroughly vet and go through the security clearance investigation," he said, adding that in many cases the immigrants are not immediately put in jobs that require top secret clearance.

Under the new program, recruits are quickly enrolled in the citizenship system and when they start basic training, an expedited process kicks off, including all required paperwork and testing.

By the time Air Force recruits finish their seven weeks of training, the process is complete and they are sworn in as American citizens.

The first group of 14 included several who are seeking various medical jobs, while another wants to be an air transportation specialist.

Thomas said Airman 1st Class Natalia Laziuk, 31, emigrated from Russia nine years ago, has dreamed of being a US citizen since she was 11, and learned about the military by watching American movies and television.

"Talking to this young airman, she essentially said, 'I just wanted to be useful to my country,'" he said. "And that's a story that we see played over and over and over again. I've talked to a number of these folks around the country. They're hungry to serve."

For Bidari, who arrived in the US in 2016 to attend college, the fast track to citizenship was important because it will make it easier for her to travel and bring her parents to the United States to visit.

Speaking in a call from Chicago just a day after she was sworn in, she said she enlisted for six years and hopes that her future citizenship will help her become an officer.

In Chicago earlier this year, Army Secretary Christine Wormuth heard from a number of recruiters about the increased outreach to immigrant communities and how it helped them meet their numbers.

In the 2022 budget year, they said, the Chicago recruiting battalion enlisted 70 legal permanent residents and already this year they have enlisted 62.

More broadly across the Army, close to 2,900 enlisted during the first half of this budget year, compared with about 2,200 during the same period the previous year.

The largest numbers are from Jamaica, with 384, followed by Mexico, the Philippines and Haiti, but many are from Nepal, Nigeria, Ghana, Cameroon, Colombia and the Dominican Republic.

"As a little girl, looking at the soldiers, I always had admiration for them," said Bidari, recalling British troops in Nepal. "Yesterday, when I was able to take that oath … I don't think I have words to really explain how I was feeling. When they said, 'Welcome future soldier,' I was like, 'Oh my goodness, this is happening.'"


84izi.jpg
 
Last edited:
We already do.

US military offers legal migrants path to citizenship amid recruiting shortfall





84izi.jpg
I hope,that you last longer then Rome.
World with you is hard place to live,but without you it would be worst.
And,as History teach us,it could be ALWAYS be worst.

I read many memories of poles who survived gulags or GERMAN death camps - they always thought that they are in worst possible place,till they get send to new one...which,of course,was worst.
 
Last edited:
We already do.

US military offers legal migrants path to citizenship amid recruiting shortfall





84izi.jpg
Honestly recruiting foreigners is not a bad idea as long as certain conditions are met the Gurkhas worked well for the UK and the French Foreign Legion also is stellar. Offering amnesty for illegals or automatic citizenship to those who join and giving it to their family if they sign up for more than one term could be a way to boost manpower. The problem with the foederati and Rome was other issues.
 
Honestly recruiting foreigners is not a bad idea as long as certain conditions are met the Gurkhas worked well for the UK and the French Foreign Legion also is stellar. Offering amnesty for illegals or automatic citizenship to those who join and giving it to their family if they sign up for more than one term could be a way to boost manpower. The problem with the foederati and Rome was other issues.
The problem is that maybe, just maybe, we have too many foreigners in the USA to begin with. And that maybe its time the USA stops playing world police so much.
 
Yeah. We had a German lady who wanted to prove her ex wrong, we had a couple people from Latin America, an African.
 
Honestly recruiting foreigners is not a bad idea as long as certain conditions are met the Gurkhas worked well for the UK and the French Foreign Legion also is stellar. Offering amnesty for illegals or automatic citizenship to those who join and giving it to their family if they sign up for more than one term could be a way to boost manpower. The problem with the foederati and Rome was other issues.
Good for elite forces,or bodyguards.

But,if you replace your standing army with foreigners,in long term it ALWAYS end bad.
 
The Military Recruiting Crisis: Even Veterans Don’t Want Their Children to Join

ky Nisperos's grandfather came to the U.S. from Mexico, and became an American citizen by serving in the U.S. Navy. Her father, Ernest Nisperos, is an active-duty officer in the Air Force with two decades of service. For years, Sky planned to follow a similar path.

"I wanted to be a fighter pilot," the 22-year-old said. "It was stuck in my head."

Now, one of the most influential people in her life—her father—is telling her that a military career may not be the right thing.
The children of military families make up the majority of new recruits in the U.S. military. That pipeline is now under threat, which is bad news for the Pentagon's already acute recruitment problems, as well as America's military readiness.
"Influencers are not telling them to go into the military," said Adm. Mike Mullen, the former chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, in an interview. "Moms and dads, uncles, coaches and pastors don't see it as a good choice."

The U.S. Army in 2022 had its toughest recruiting year since the advent of the all-volunteer military in 1973 and missed its goal by 25%. This year, it expects to end up about 15,000 short of its target of 65,000 recruits.

The Navy expects to fall short by as many as 10,000 of its goal of nearly 38,000 recruits this year, and the Air Force has said it is anticipating coming in at 3,000 below its goal of nearly 27,000. The Marine Corps met its target last year of sending 33,000 to boot camp, and expects to meet its goals this year, but its leaders described recruitment as challenging.


This is in line what I have seen on other forums with large number of military veterans, even during the Obama years they were all for their kids, relatives and friends joining the military, but last few years they actively warn anyone from joining. Also the shortfall has another effect aside from reduced head count, lowered recruitment standards along with lowered training standards means that there are lot more useless idiots coming into ranks than before. Anyone who served in the military (or any other demanding job) has the experience of disruptive mouthbreathing idiot that the service would be better without, empty posting would be less damaging than the guy being present - well, there is a lot more of them now.
 
The Military Recruiting Crisis: Even Veterans Don’t Want Their Children to Join






This is in line what I have seen on other forums with large number of military veterans, even during the Obama years they were all for their kids, relatives and friends joining the military, but last few years they actively warn anyone from joining. Also the shortfall has another effect aside from reduced head count, lowered recruitment standards along with lowered training standards means that there are lot more useless idiots coming into ranks than before. Anyone who served in the military (or any other demanding job) has the experience of disruptive mouthbreathing idiot that the service would be better without, empty posting would be less damaging than the guy being present - well, there is a lot more of them now.

Keep in mind that the government just had a 20 year long war and then instantly turned on its veterans calling them potential domestic terrorists even before the war ended.

You cant do that shit and then expect people to be jazzed about being the next group of people the government will stab in the back.
 
The Military Recruiting Crisis: Even Veterans Don’t Want Their Children to Join






This is in line what I have seen on other forums with large number of military veterans, even during the Obama years they were all for their kids, relatives and friends joining the military, but last few years they actively warn anyone from joining. Also the shortfall has another effect aside from reduced head count, lowered recruitment standards along with lowered training standards means that there are lot more useless idiots coming into ranks than before. Anyone who served in the military (or any other demanding job) has the experience of disruptive mouthbreathing idiot that the service would be better without, empty posting would be less damaging than the guy being present - well, there is a lot more of them now.
Good. Goooooood.
 
Technically the Aztecs we truly don't know ow how old because we do know that there was a civilization before them they built onto of.
The Aztecs as we know them were basically a small tribe of Jungle Mongols that raped and pillaged their way south until they found their "promised land" (the lake/islands) -- it's why their civilization, by the time the Spanish arrived, was pretty young (as in Roman Late Republic/Early Empire young).

They did displace, conquer, and absorb other, smaller civilizations like Rome did in its infancy, though; not much is known about them, like with Rome (we know only a little bit about the Etruscans from the surviving bits that were assimilated into Roman culture/life/language, for example).

The Aztecs basically just ran out of time after having a very, very late start, if this were a game of Civilization.
 
Not gonna lie.
WHY are you all hoping our military is gutted and ir solely leftists?
One, it’ll be less effective so less likely to prompt in overseas adventures.

Two, if the worse comes to pass, it’ll be much easier for us to beat them. As I have my doubts that the military would support any right wing rebellion in the case of a Second American Civil War anyway.
 
The Aztecs as we know them were basically a small tribe of Jungle Mongols that raped and pillaged their way south until they found their "promised land" (the lake/islands) -- it's why their civilization, by the time the Spanish arrived, was pretty young (as in Roman Late Republic/Early Empire young).

They did displace, conquer, and absorb other, smaller civilizations like Rome did in its infancy, though; not much is known about them, like with Rome (we know only a little bit about the Etruscans from the surviving bits that were assimilated into Roman culture/life/language, for example).

The Aztecs basically just ran out of time after having a very, very late start, if this were a game of Civilization.

One, it’ll be less effective so less likely to prompt in overseas adventures.

Two, if the worse comes to pass, it’ll be much easier for us to beat them. As I have my doubts that the military would support any right wing rebellion in the case of a Second American Civil War anyway.
In a civil war the military would split with many nit chosing sides.
And having a weak military is the opposite of what we want as a nation.
Sure the whole "no new wars"
But what happens when our adversaries attack us and we can't stop it because of the weaker military?
The Aztecs as we know them were basically a small tribe of Jungle Mongols that raped and pillaged their way south until they found their "promised land" (the lake/islands) -- it's why their civilization, by the time the Spanish arrived, was pretty young (as in Roman Late Republic/Early Empire young).

They did displace, conquer, and absorb other, smaller civilizations like Rome did in its infancy, though; not much is known about them, like with Rome (we know only a little bit about the Etruscans from the surviving bits that were assimilated into Roman culture/life/language, for example).

The Aztecs basically just ran out of time after having a very, very late start, if this were a game of Civilization.
I mean there Is the Olmec people
 
  • Like
Reactions: Poe
In a civil war the military would split with many nit chosing sides.
See, this is where you really do not understand that pretty much no one actually believes this.

The reality is that the US military will take orders from it's pay masters, regardless of whether they obey the Constitution or not.

So the idea the military would 'split' in the event of a 'civil war' (we're more likely to see an American Troubles, than ACW 2.0) is something that many simply do not believe.

Which is why a lot of people are ok with shrinking US forces; it means DC is both less likely to do some stupid A-stan or Iraq 2.0 bullshit, and that there are fewer forces that could be called up by their pay masters in DC to put down people rising up against their disregard for the Constitution and citizenry.
And having a weak military is the opposite of what we want as a nation.
Sure the whole "no new wars"
But what happens when our adversaries attack us and we can't stop it because of the weaker military?
So long as the nuclear triad remains intact, the US is as secure as it needs to be against attack or invasion.

And really, the nuclear triad is the only thing that actually deters state-actors from targeting the US homeland directly; the rest of the military is effectively bits and bobs to ensure our nukes are secure and viable for their MAD missions.

So we only really need enough troops to ensure our nuclear triad is viable, if the goal is actually protecting the US homeland; as opposed to maintaining expeditionary capacity so we can go fuck up places like Iraq and A-stan on a whim, that needs a larger force and more than just the means to defend the homeland.

And if we can keep cranking out weapons for our allies, then we do not even need that many forces of our own, because it would mean we allow people to fight their own battles, but with our aid helping determine victors.
I mean there Is the Olmec people
Yes, and even the Olmec's were the descendants of survivors of previosu civs in Central America; turns out building huge towns at the foot of volcanoes, repeatedly, tends to lead to your leadership caste and governing bodies getting wiped out on a disturbing regular basis.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top