United States US presidential election 2024

Reader mode
Abhorsen said:
So a primary is a normal election, but held just for one party.

A caucus is where instead, it's more like a meeting. Everyone who's voting get together, speeches in favor of candidates are made by people there, and then voting happens, and there can even be multiple rounds of voting.


It'd help if you specified which was which.
Click to expand...
Don't know offhand to the google machine.

www.cbsnews.com

Trump wasn't on Nevada's 2024 GOP primary ballot, and Haley won't be on Nevada's caucus ballot. Here's why.

Former President Donald Trump noted in his victory speech after the New Hampshire primary that Nikki Haley won't be on the ballot for the Nevada caucuses.
www.cbsnews.com www.cbsnews.com

so the State passed a law to try and force the GOP to run a primary instead of a caucus. but the party has control of that since it is private. so the caucus is the real one with the don and the also rans.



difference between caucus and primary
 
Blasterbot said:
Don't know offhand to the google machine.

www.cbsnews.com

Trump wasn't on Nevada's 2024 GOP primary ballot, and Haley won't be on Nevada's caucus ballot. Here's why.

Former President Donald Trump noted in his victory speech after the New Hampshire primary that Nikki Haley won't be on the ballot for the Nevada caucuses.
www.cbsnews.com www.cbsnews.com

so the State passed a law to try and force the GOP to run a primary instead of a caucus. but the party has control of that since it is private. so the caucus is the real one with the don and the also rans.



difference between caucus and primary
Click to expand...

United States Senators who've announced they're backing Trump:
Wicker (R-MS)
Hyde-Smith (R-MS)
Cotton (R-AR)
Boozman (R-AR)
Graham (R-SC)
Paul (R-KY)
Scott (R-FL)
Rubio (R-FL)
Tuberville (R-AL)
Britt (R-AL)
Cruz (R-TX)
Risch (R-ID)

Plus many many more.
 
Abhorsen said:
Oh, I'm talking in terms of what happens at the local level. I.e. what to expect going to a primary vs going to a caucus.

In other news, after talking to Vivek, Trump has promised to be against CBDCs, which is absolutely massively important.
Click to expand...

Wonder if Vivek is aiming for Treasury Secretary instead of VP.
 
udIEzJBqhAb5.jpeg
 
Eh, for the DoD they would have to get a whole bunch of other trainings and if CI, would have to be military.
 
Honestly, the right thing to do would be very difficult, because each and every person working there should be investigated to see if they are an enemy agent of some kind. Other than that, these agents he's talking about moving around will just corrupt the other agencies they end up in and doing the same things.

The ATF should just be plain eliminated, though.
 
Captain X said:
Honestly, the right thing to do would be very difficult, because each and every person working there should be investigated to see if they are an enemy agent of some kind. Other than that, these agents he's talking about moving around will just corrupt the other agencies they end up in and doing the same things.
Click to expand...
First, those other agencies have similar problems. The DEA has a ton of problems, for just one.

Second, the agents being moved are the ground level people. He details his plan pretty clearly. 20k bureaucrats being fired and the end of the institution itself is a huge win,

Third, very few of them are actual legal enemy agents. It's not against the law to be a woke communist, for example. They are motivated by ideology, not allegiance to China. Don't get me wrong, that's worse than simply being motivated by money IMO, but it's also not prosecutable.

Also, he agrees about the ATF.
 
Abhorsen said:
First, those other agencies have similar problems. The DEA has a ton of problems, for just one.

Second, the agents being moved are the ground level people. He details his plan pretty clearly. 20k bureaucrats being fired and the end of the institution itself is a huge win,

Third, very few of them are actual legal enemy agents. It's not against the law to be a woke communist, for example. They are motivated by ideology, not allegiance to China. Don't get me wrong, that's worse than simply being motivated by money IMO, but it's also not prosecutable.

Also, he agrees about the ATF.
Click to expand...
I guess I consider them an enemy agent if they participated in stuff like Ruby Ridge/Waco, as well as those who have been participating in the Jan 6 stuff and the like. Basically the people who are authoritarians and shouldn't be allowed to have any power or authority over anyone and should probably be in jail themselves.
 
Captain X said:
I guess I consider them an enemy agent if they participated in stuff like Ruby Ridge/Waco, as well as those who have been participating in the Jan 6 stuff and the like. Basically the people who are authoritarians and shouldn't be allowed to have any power or authority over anyone and should probably be in jail themselves.
Click to expand...
Oh, I completely agree with you that there will be a lot of bad people left, don't get me wrong. But that's not a legally dealable level of bad, to start with.

Also, that tends to be the type of bad that every police force is full of: the "go along to get along" type. They won't come up with the bad idea, they might even privately disagree with it, but they'll "just following orders" all the way to hell.

I don't even know that you can get rid of that group, unfortunately. Generally, people who sign up to work for the state and enforce the state's laws have an authoritarian streak. And the ones who won't are more likely to be fired or quit. Basically, you end up with a skewed pool. The targetable issue, in my mind, is the bureaucrats, because it's an easier political sell, and it gets rid of those developing the bad policies.
 
Captain X said:
I guess I consider them an enemy agent if they participated in stuff like Ruby Ridge/Waco, as well as those who have been participating in the Jan 6 stuff and the like. Basically the people who are authoritarians and shouldn't be allowed to have any power or authority over anyone and should probably be in jail themselves.
Click to expand...
My newest conspiracy theory is that a lot of the provocateurs on Jan. 6 were Clinton Plants. You had something like three times the amount of people who died in the BLM riots? Which leads me to believe that overall it is the liberals/left that are the more prone to violence and destruction of property. Ergo: Clinton plants.
 
Reader mode
You must log in or register to reply here.

Users who are viewing this thread

Total: 1 (members: 0, guests: 1)
Back
Top