D
Deleted member 1
Guest
I'm pretty confident so, since I recall for certain @LordSunhawk condemning the "selectively strict liability" enforcement of SB and SV staff with regard to "not noticing" or falsely claiming that no one reported the use of full-fledged slurs by favored users, but banhammering disliked users for slurs even when quoting someone else or making "in character" use of terms in the context of a story.
What's being enforced here and now is clearcut cases of absolutely intentional use of a slur as a slur. As such, I strongly disagree with the argument that it's any sort of a slippery slope.
You are correct. And indeed, selective enforcement is not what we are going to do. We have fairly consistently applied the distinction between acceptable and unacceptable uses of problematic language.