Keep in mind that in the UK cops aid and abet child sex trafficking, looking the other way while little girls are groomed, raped, and abused while at the same time intimidating concerned citizens into silence or even arresting them for supposed “hate speech” if they try to shine light onthis issue.
Anybody heard of Rotherham?
We’re at the point, I’d say, that opposing fighting back against the police is an extreme hateful position, not the reverse.
Though, expressing extreme positions isn’t the same as incivility is it? In the modern UK, the moderate civil position is that it should be legal for Muslim immigrants to rape little girls. The extreme, hateful, Nazi position is that it should be illegal and severely punished.
It may seem like I am pulling Rotherham’s groom gang scandal out of nowhere but I think it directly ties into this topic. People would say that banning or at least shunning “hate speech” is just common decency and does no harm. Well, it does do harm, it protects child rapists in Britain, and that is just one town in one country. Sometimes the truth offends people, some people find good ideas to be hateful, and when ideas are silenced (with force or not) then we blind ourselves and others to real problems.
So, is it better not to insult or offend people? Sure. Don’t offend people any more than you need to, though sometimes you need to when you tell the truth. Some people are worse than others and pointing that out can seem quite offensive, yet it is still true.
So, I’d error on the side of encouraging thick skin. Maybe someone is an asshole to you, get over it, move on. Console yourself in the knowledge that either their insults are baseless, in which case it shouldn’t trouble you in the slightest, or they are saying something true that offends you in which case maybe you should listen even if it makes you uncomfortable.