Ok I actually worked on a farm for a little while every thing Argent says about farm work? I second it, working on a farm sucks it sucks unbelivably bad.
the problem is people get bored and they romanticize the "Good old days" not realizing our ancestors lived liked that because they had to not because they wanted to. Grass is greener mentality has destroyed nations faster than anything.
You know nothing stopping Rural Black Farmers from forming these. Agricultural cooperative - Wikipedia
On my moms side we have and have had plenty of successful Black owned Farms. Doubting that it can't be done in Africa proper by the local Black population with just a little help is to be frank patronizing.
Sure, the doubt is if there's a big supply of blacks desperate to start a farm who haven't done so already, and doubt that this will end with the farms benefiting black families, rather than benefiting politically connected elite as it tends to.
Ruined Farm You Bastards will stay poor
www.sunray22b.net
It’s possible for a family to make a living with a small farm, in fact I know a family that does this, but it’s not easy and it requires not only a lot of work, but finding the right niche and the right market for your products. A lot of making the family farm work is the right contacts and the right community. Knowing the fancy restaurants that want to buy local produce, having an established presence in a farmers market where you can offer free range meat, raw milk, or what ever it is people want for ideological reaso
So, your answer to being questioned on your claim is to simply repeat the assertion?
What kills competitors, is the competition. That is why they call it that. Mom & pops soda stall vs PepsiCo will never be a fair fight. It's not government regulations that make it so, it's the fact that PepsiCo buying ingredients at millions of times the rate lets them economise on costs and sell their product cheaper. Having much larger pools of cash lets them research the market and and produce optimised products vs Mom&Pop just guessing they want lemonade. It's them being able to distribute to every corner of the globe, rather than every corner of their block. It's them having the budget to advertise to every fence sitter that their product is backed by scientific testing (That the opposition can't afford) to reduce thirst. It's them being able to pay Mom&Pop more than they'd make from the stall to just sit at home and do nothing till everyone forgets them. It's all that and more, because having money makes it easier to make more money.
So, tell me again how getting rid of government regulations saying Mom&Pop have to wear gloves so they don't spread disease, or how they have to pass health inspection to prove they're not selling kids rotted fruit juice is killing the competition? And then, maybe back up your idea that the free market of wall street is what imposes those restrictions on every business big and small, costing the larger businesses far more? Or... Maybe just repeat your shitty unsupported postion again? That would be fun too.
In Poland we had commie economy,and all were poor.But in 1989 commies wanted to be rich after stealing state goods,so they made free economy - everybody could become merchant with anything except weapon.
That was for commies,but common people start buing and selling,and become richer.ex-Commies from 1995 then started regulate more and more...and now only rich could start any business.Which mostly are foreigner or ex-commies.
But when nobody regulated it,ordinary citizen could be rich thanks to hard work.
To made it worst,ruling polish fake right is almost as bad,becouse they belive in state.It seems,that unless God made another miracle for us,we are screwed.Or maybe friendly aliens ?its not enough to do well with commies they have to kick down too.
Assholes.
To made it worst,ruling polish fake right is almost as bad,becouse they belive in state.It seems,that unless God made another miracle for us,we are screwed.Or maybe friendly aliens ?
I'm sorry, are you seriously saying that action intended to reduce white supremacy in a given field is inherently "sinister"?The point of this is simple as it is sinister, it is intended to do no less than break the political power and cultural cohesion of the rural White population.
There is no other objective but this.
I’m sorry, but any action intended to harm the white population is Anti White. If that makes me a White Supremacist, then so be it.I'm sorry, are you seriously saying that action intended to reduce white supremacy in a given field is inherently "sinister"?
It's not so much that they're in favor of regulations; they just want to control the economic system, regardless of what form it takes. If there was no regulation, they'd still try to buy themselves an unfair advantage over their smaller competitors.Regarding regulation - the guys who run the big corporations know the score, they’re no fools. They know that regulations privilege them over smaller businesses. How do we know that regulations help them? Because just about all of the mega-corporations support the Democrat Party or then equivalent leftist (yet corporatist) parties around the world. If big corporations wanted to eliminate regulations, then they would give billions of dollars to libertarian candidates and libertarian candidates would get all of the positive media attention. They don’t though, it’s the big regulation Democrats who get most of the corporate support and then the moderate regulation Republicans who get the rest.
I'm sorry, are you seriously saying that action intended to reduce white supremacy in a given field is inherently "sinister"?
I'm sorry, are you seriously saying that action intended to reduce white supremacy in a given field is inherently "sinister"?
I'm sorry, are you seriously saying that action intended to reduce white supremacy in a given field is inherently "sinister"?