republicans storm secrect inquries

HistoryMinor

Well-known member
Okay what's bullshit and explain how.
James Comey was a republican, just because the FBI does its job and investigates Trump's open corruption doesn't mean they're leftwing. That's the cult of personality talking. Also, just because wealth is centered in a city doesn't mean it's held by democrats. Guess where Trump Tower is located.
 

Lightershoulders

Just another, seeking.
Uh, dude, no. Even up to the civil rights movement, 200 years after the civil war, democrats were still the party of racism and division. The republicans have been consistently pro-civil liberty and still are today! Look at modern democrats pushing for the freedom of speech to be even more restricted than it already is FFS.

Hell, what party today is actually allowing places to reinstate segregation? Advertising such? The democrats.

Dude.

There is racism on both sides, I promise I can find Republicans that are racist, and parts of the US that still have segregation signs up that have never been bothered with. That's not the point.

My point had nothing to do with race besides the fact that Democrats were southerners, with the slave owners holding economic power who wanted slavery.

While I didn't state it, because I felt it was obvious with how I pointed out the average democratic vs. The extremists who would want slavery.

My reasoning for the Democrats of the past wanting to be Republicans is due to their stances on states rights and rigorous stance on foreign policy and military.
 

FriedCFour

PunishedCFour
Founder
James Comey was a republican, just because the FBI does its job and investigates Trump's open corruption doesn't mean they're leftwing. That's the cult of personality talking. Also, just because wealth is centered in a city doesn't mean it's held by democrats. Guess where Trump Tower is located.
RINO! And yes, the wealthiest companies in the world are massive supporters democrats. Google, Amazon, Facebook. You really think they are donating more to Republicans than Democrats? The corporate Democrats are the most favorable to them by far. And besides, it really isn't like the rich are purely motivated by money. Rich are people too, they have ideals just like me and you. Almost everyone is motivated in some part by personal gain and some part by idealism, I would really like you to prove that as soon as you hit a certain income level you are no longer capable of holding any ideals what so ever.
 

HistoryMinor

Well-known member
RINO! And yes, the wealthiest companies in the world are massive supporters democrats. Google, Amazon, Facebook. You really think they are donating more to Republicans than Democrats? The corporate Democrats are the most favorable to them by far. And besides, it really isn't like the rich are purely motivated by money. Rich are people too, they have ideals just like me and you. Almost everyone is motivated in some part by personal gain and some part by idealism, I would really like you to prove that as soon as you hit a certain income level you are no longer capable of holding any ideals what so ever.
DINO! I'm arguing with a cultist, time to bail. Facebook literally let Russians influence the election and give a shit ton to the Republicans. You're just mad that Bazos had the audacity to criticize your god emperor.
 

FriedCFour

PunishedCFour
Founder
DINO! I'm arguing with a cultist, time to bail. Facebook literally let Russians influence the election and give a shit ton to the Republicans. You're just mad that Bazos had the audacity to criticize your god emperor.
How much did Facebook give to Republicans as compared to Democrats. And how'd they let Russians influence the election?

My reasoning for the Democrats of the past wanting to be Republicans is due to their stances on states rights and rigorous stance on foreign policy and military.
The Democrats and Republicans of the past would both be Republicans today. The democrats of the modern day are an entirely new political entity that looks nothing like the past whereas you can still see aspects of both Democrat and Republican positions over a hundred years prior in the Republican party.
 

Lightershoulders

Just another, seeking.
The Democrats and Republicans of the past would both be Republicans today. The democrats of the modern day are an entirely new political entity that looks nothing like the past whereas you can still see aspects of both Democrat and Republican positions over a hundred years prior in the Republican party.

You're conflicting the far left with moderate Democrats. They aren't nearly as bad.
 

FriedCFour

PunishedCFour
Founder
You're conflicting the far left with moderate Democrats. They aren't nearly as bad.
They also don't exist as a political entity. Blue Dogs are extinct. At this point the party line socially includes

Abortion up to 9 months for any reason unrestricted and its perfectly fine and will be taxpayer funded.
You can cross the border freely and just pay a small fine at worst with no deportation, and get free healthcare.
We will take your guns.

The difference between far left and "moderate" Dem like Joe Biden is pretty much purely in economics. Joe wants to support giant corporations, others want to break them down. But if you want to say there was a party switch and democrats look more like Republicans in the 1850s-70s, go ahead and look at their platform and politics, and then the Democrats, and then what they didn't disagree on politically, what was taken as a non-issue they both agreed on. Those unspoken, uncontroversial points is where much of the political controversy of today is, and Republicans largely hold to what both agreed on.
 

Speaker4thesilent

Crazed Deplorable
Facebook literally let Russians influence the election
This has been thoroughly debunked. The advertising referenced ran after the election was over! Causality indicates that something that occurs after another event can not be a cause of that event. Please don’t just rely on what the media spews out. It is been years since they let facts bother them when they are spouting their opinions.
 

CarlManvers2019

Writers Blocked Douchebag
This has been thoroughly debunked. The adds referenced ran after the election was over! Causality indicates that something that occurs after another event can not be a cause of that event. Please don’t just rely on what the media spews out. It is been years since they let facts bother them when they are spouting their opinions.

Don’t the guys on SB buy into the whole Tulsi Gabbard’s a Russian Pawn stuff?
 

Terthna

Professional Lurker
Don’t know, don’t care. I haven’t been in Whitehall since the Kavanaugh debacle. It became apparent to me that any conservative who dared speak up would be subject to a lynching, so I just stopped going there. Better for my stress levels.
It wasn't just the conservatives; any deviation from generally agreed upon opinions, no matter how slight, would cause practically the entire sub-forum to lay into you without mercy, until you stopped saying things they didn't like. Every assumption must be correct, and any attempt at self-reflection would be punished. Whitehall is basically a cult, and has been one for years.
 

CarlManvers2019

Writers Blocked Douchebag
It wasn't just the conservatives; any deviation from generally agreed upon opinions, no matter how slight, would cause practically the entire sub-forum to lay into you without mercy, until you stopped saying things they didn't like.

I remember a month or two back, Realm saying that SB is “Center Right”, not sure what they agree with anybody close to Right to begin with
 

LifeisTiresome

Well-known member
I remember a month or two back, Realm saying that SB is “Center Right”, not sure what they agree with anybody close to Right to begin with
They are right cause the left say they are right wing.

Thats what all need to understand. The left are love name-calling, insulting and labelling you. They complain when you do it, but they love doing it.

They have successfully convinced people that anything violent or they don't like is right wing.

There is a youtube video where a professor and his class was harassed by protestors who are spouting left wing points but the professor calls them right wing extremists.
 

CarlManvers2019

Writers Blocked Douchebag
There is a youtube video where a professor and his class was harassed by protestors who are spouting left wing points but the professor calls them right wing extremists.

Huh, I remember once reading some article about how SJW’s ironically very much share aspects with the “Far Right” they hate and how they were very much corporate
 

Scottty

Well-known member
Founder
Looking at this from outside, this idea of painting the Republicans as having somehow "exchanged places" with the Democrats is pretty ridiculous. It's the sort of thing that requires the people pushing it to believe things that they know aren't true.

Let's take a walk through history:

19th cent:
Democrat Policy: Supporting slavery
Republican Policy: Equality of all before the law, regardless of race.

Early 20th
Democrat Policy: Segregation and "Jim Crow"
Republican Policy: Equality of all before the law, regardless of race.

Late 20th to early 21st
Democrat Policy: Affirmative action, racial quotas, special "protected" groups with extra rights
Republican Policy: Equality of all before the law, regardless of race.

So the Dems all along are the people who believe that people should be treated differently depending on their skin colour. They've just changed the details of what different treatment it should be.

While the Donkey dances around, the Elephant stands there unmoving.
 

CarlManvers2019

Writers Blocked Douchebag
So the Dems all along are the people who believe that people should be treated differently depending on their skin colour. They've just changed the details of what different treatment it should be.

While the Donkey dances around, the Elephant stands there unmoving.

Well, the “affirmative action” is done under the assumption that even with this free and equal under the eyes of the law sort of stuff, those “minorities” are left to the mercies of people who may choose or not choose to be bigots

Also, economic circumstances can be inherited or worsened by the generation, there is the believe that the only way to help the majority of these people is NOT through charities and entrepreneurship but constantly enforced government help

And another thing, you sure Conservatives aren’t the reason for censorship of entertainment before? The less successful at dividing and invading fandoms and creators “Moral Guardians” were a thing

Though, those guys didn’t look Free Market Capitalistic enough
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Top