Bassoe
Well-known member
I don't get it.
For the sake of argument, imagine for a moment that Hancock was right and there was a prehistoric civilization of at most renaissance levels of technological sophistication* which was destroyed by the Younger Dryas event?
How does this influence modern politics? Sure it'd be interesting and a bunch of history textbooks would have to be rewritten, but what about it would be so important to the modern world to motivate a massive conspiratorial coverup on the part of the status quo?
* Any more advanced and they'd have had a use for and therefore dug up and expended all the oil necessary to make technological infrastructure which could be extracted without preexisting technological infrastructure and our industrial civilization wouldn't have been possible.
For the sake of argument, imagine for a moment that Hancock was right and there was a prehistoric civilization of at most renaissance levels of technological sophistication* which was destroyed by the Younger Dryas event?
How does this influence modern politics? Sure it'd be interesting and a bunch of history textbooks would have to be rewritten, but what about it would be so important to the modern world to motivate a massive conspiratorial coverup on the part of the status quo?
* Any more advanced and they'd have had a use for and therefore dug up and expended all the oil necessary to make technological infrastructure which could be extracted without preexisting technological infrastructure and our industrial civilization wouldn't have been possible.