My guess...they are pulling rounds from storage for those guns...wonder what that failure rate will look like.Those oldies utilize 100mm guns. Do the Russians still make HEAT rounds for those??
My guess...they are pulling rounds from storage for those guns...wonder what that failure rate will look like.Those oldies utilize 100mm guns. Do the Russians still make HEAT rounds for those??
Those oldies utilize 100mm guns. Do the Russians still make HEAT rounds for those??
This makes sense.They could probably source tank ammunition from North Korea or something with less issues.
M-55S have the excellent (if still rifled) L7 gun though, T-55's have literal WW2 cannons first mounted on the SU-100.To be fair Slovenia has shipped a number of M-55S tanks to Ukraine that are modernized T55, but those hulls have been completely revamped and modernized.
At this rate the Russians are going to be pulling out T34s and IS series tanks by the end of the year.
To be fair Slovenia has shipped a number of M-55S tanks to Ukraine that are modernized T55, but those hulls have been completely revamped and modernized.
At this rate the Russians are going to be pulling out T34s and IS series tanks by the end of the year.
To be fair Slovenia has shipped a number of M-55S tanks to Ukraine that are modernized T55, but those hulls have been completely revamped and modernized.
At this rate the Russians are going to be pulling out T34s and IS series tanks by the end of the year.
Yup, M-55S has fairly modern fire control, sensors, and practically the same gun as mounted on M60's, 2 first Merkava models and basic M1's. That's what makes it a considerably different tank. It doesn't have the protection of modern tanks, but it has considerably better offensive capabilities than the base model, and even some newer eastern tanks.M-55S have the excellent (if still rifled) L7 gun though, T-55's have literal WW2 cannons first mounted on the SU-100.
Yeah the performance of a gun is mostly ammunition-related, but I would not be full of confidence if I was in a tank with a cannon older than my grandfather.
a) The industrial facilities that can handle refurbishing T-72's are already working at 100% with that and combat damaged tanks.I think the main issue is that Russia supposedly had 10,000 T-72's and like 3,000 T-80's in storage so they would've never conceivably run out of tanks to the point they'd be dragging out T-55's after a year of fighting. I don't think anyone was even thinking T-55's were being kept in any sort of storage for reserve use.
Either they're thinking they don't want to waste a better tank in their Invasion of Ukraine since losing a T-55 is only slightly more prone to being lost then a T-72 with how they are using them so if your going to lose a bunch of tanks, might as well lose a hundred crappy T-55's instead of ninety T-72's/T-80's or they have far less tanks they can easily refurbish... or both.
That seems less like an IT hack and more like socialotechnical hack involving the officer's wives.OTOH, +1 for good spy work.
OTOH, -1 for posting it on twitter while the conflict is ongoing... even if Russian IT had this particular hack discovered and plugged it's likely that info and vulnerability wasn't as widely disseminated to the entire military... and now it's hanging out there like Anthony Weiner's wiener...
Does nothing to contradict my point that putting your epic spy pwn on twitter while the war is still ongoing is kinda sorta super dumb.That seems less like an IT hack and more like socialotechnical hack involving the officer's wives.
It does help drive paranoia on the other side, while on the other hand, how do you fix OPSEC unaware soldier families? Countless armies and corporations try to fix that since decades and it still happens, what are they gonna do?Does nothing to contradict my point that putting your epic spy pwn on twitter while the war is still ongoing is kinda sorta super dumb.