This is silly. Their genetics still aren't pure arab though. Will you say the French aren't descended from the Gauls because they lost the language? Italians Romans? Are the Egyptians not related to the Ancient Egyptians because they don't worship Ra or Isis but instead Allah? Are the Greeks not related to the Ancient Greeks because they worship Christ instead of Zeus?
In all these cases though they still have direct cultural and historical relationship to their past and are their own nations based on that.
Nope,they are ancient people who take arab cukture and religion.Not the same thing.
Then they are no longer "ancient people", they are assimilated Arabs, as they took their politics, religion, culture, language, identity, even interbred with them.
All interbred with each other at some point or another. As i said, especially in that region, genetically pure groups are very rare and neither of those is even close to that.
No,they are ancient people who take arab culture.Just like eastern jews are chazars who take jewish culture.
Then they are Arabs. They have no culture of their own and they are interbred with Arabs, the "ancient people" don't exist any more than Vistulans, Picts or Hittites.
What's the difference between Arabs and Palestinians then, and why do people even talk of Palestinians just since 1970's? Did they have a collective amnesia event so that they forgot that they are "ancient people who just happened to act completely assimilated to Arab society and culture as a joke" for some centuries?
The same like between eastern european jews and sefardim - culture is still slighty different,and real arabs are not people who take arab culture.
Aren’t you trying to have your cake and eat it too? You support the west destabilize Arab nations and preventing pan Arabism from forming an Arab super state but when a sub group wants a nation but it would inconvenience western neocon interests you backpedal.
LOL. I think Arab nations are more than capable of destabilizing themselves in the first place.
Would an Arab superstate be good for the West?
No need.Palestinians arleady consider themselves as nation.All thanks to fake Izrael.
So why do they care about Arab's pet peeves then? I've even posted quotes of PLO leaders explaining how much they "consider themselves a nation" and why.
That's a pre internet conspiracy theory, stop embarrassing yourself.
1.Some of them - maybe..For others,they are nation now.Just like ukrainians from Kiev become ukrainians thanks to Moscov invasion.In 2014 they woud welcome putin,if he come there.So why do they care about Arab's pet peeves then? I've even posted quotes of PLO leaders explaining how much they "consider themselves a nation" and why.
That's a pre internet conspiracy theory, stop embarrassing yourself.
Khazar hypothesis of Ashkenazi ancestry - Wikipedia
en.wikipedia.org
Let Muscovites keep their stupid theories for themselves.Khazar hypothesis of Ashkenazi ancestry - Wikipedia
Obviously they didn't, just some sovoks in the east.
Yes, from 19th century political pieces, see the problem?
Again, pure fiction.
In what way was Ukrainian customs and history separate from Russian? Ukraine was not a nation till recently.
Not for lack of trying though.
).1.Ukrainian as nation was made by A-H after 1848,but in 1918 they were till minority among ukrainian speaking locals.That is why nobody defended Kiev when Poland take it for them,and all able poish male go to army when soviet were under Warsaw.
It doesn't, you are repeating some propagandist who can't even read DNA studies without seeing the study itself?
Sorry for being unclear.Ukrainians did notching in 1848,becouse they do not existed yet,but A-H authorities decide to made them as nation to counter poles in their country,and tsar,who could use all ukrainian speaking peasants against them.Whatever, it was a pretty common time for national identities to arise in Europe, and blaming it on one or another power is beside the point.Revolutions of 1848 - Wikipedia
It doesn't, you are repeating some propagandist who can't even read DNA studies without seeing the study itself?
If they didn't exist, who spoke Ukrainian then, and why did Russians ban teaching it?