Alex Jones Trial/Lawsuits

See, I might buy that they didn't mean what they said about 'not being paid enough for this' had they not also admitted they are undertaking a 'project' to 'deradicalize' this site, and had they not routinely deleted posts that didn't get the sort of engagement/response they wanted.

So that means either Proxy is a glowie/alphabet agency agent doing the 'hunt for radicals work' in the most incompetent way possible, or they are someone from a 'sister' forum who got decided to try to stir shit here at the behest of their friends.

I mean I guess some rando from the web could also decide to do all this and undertake these actions, but Proxy's actions seem much more invested, and they did lurk here for nearly 2 years before posting much of anything.

Though the routine post deletion is something I've not seen before, and reads like Proxy wants to push convo's certain directions or try to bait certain argument, and when they don't go how Proxy wants they begin deleting their part of the situation.
I am of the opinion that Proxy is from SB. It probably is qygibo or one of her friends/lackies.

I can't prove it, I can't really even demonstrate it. It's just a really strong gut feeling.

It's just the way he posts. That SB mod culture seems to seep through into his posts. I read his posts and it just screams of an SB concern troll even harder than @Megadeath , and we already know he's from SB.

Edit: the other thing that screams "qygibo/SB" is the whole idea of "we are going to run a project to deradicalize them by having users come concern troll and make lazy, shitty arguments, and then delete their posts when it goes wrong." It's just sad, incompetent nonsense. They can't keep us off their minds. It doesn't take a genius to figure out where this came from.
 
Last edited:
Yeah, @Proxy 404 tends to like to delete posts they make that them look foolish, or that don't get the 'attention' they want/were looking for.

Unfortunately they seem to forget once a post is quoted, they cannot delete the portions that are quoted in other people's posts.

Never seen another poster do this sort of thing; feels almost like Proxy wants to stir shit up, but don't want to leave evidence of when they get clowned on.
Huh; I hadn't noticed that. I've deleted a couple posts I immediately regretted; though only ever a few minutes after I posted them, before anyone has had a chance to actually read it. But this? If they're going to use their power to delete posts to try and rewrite history in an attempt to make themselves look better, that ought to be grounds for the staff to revoke that particular privilege.
 
Yeah, @Proxy 404 tends to like to delete posts they make that them look foolish, or that don't get the 'attention' they want/were looking for.

Unfortunately they seem to forget once a post is quoted, they cannot delete the portions that are quoted in other people's posts.

Never seen another poster do this sort of thing; feels almost like Proxy wants to stir shit up, but don't want to leave evidence of when they get clowned on.
I didn't forget I was angry I wasn't allowed to close down this account mods made it clear I can not have this account deleted, anyway I do keep screen shots of everything
 
Last edited:
you guys are nuts I am not a SB mod do not give them trouble because you think I am posting here for anyone, besides myself. Also don't you kids have rules about soft doxing, anyway in my case its not even like its a fucking secret who I am I just picked a new handle when I stared posting here again the accounts the same one from 2020
 
you guys are nuts I am not a SB mod do not give them trouble because you think I am posting here for anyone, besides myself. Also don't you kids have rules about soft doxing, anyway in my case its not even like its a fucking secret who I am I just picked a new handle when I stared posting here again the accounts the same one from 2020
"Soft doxing" in this context would be exposing who you are on SB. Not just that you're from SB.

Unless you're admitting that you're, qygibo it's not soft doxing. Even then, still not soft doxing because we are just making guesses and are pretty open about that.

And even if it was soft doxing, I'd happily eat a ban for exposing you. Some rules are worth breaking. If I found out who you were, I'd gladly let everyone know.
 
Last edited:
"Soft doxing" in this context would be exposing who you are on SB. Not just that you're from SB.

Unless you're admitting that you're, qygibo it's not soft doxing.

And if you are, I'll happily eat the ban for exposing you. Some rules are worth breaking.
No I'm not her, I used my SB name here it is not a secret granted I doubt anyone remembered me and good Christ you have a problem get help
 
No I'm not her, I used my SB name here it is not a secret granted I doubt anyone remembered me and good Christ you have a problem get help
I have a problem because I don't much care about rules on a message board that I primarily use to kill time while I'm taking a dump or on a break at work?

Cool. Web forums aren't that important to me. The staff could ban me permanently right now, and I'd just go on with my life. Maybe I'd have to waste my time reading Babylon Bee articles or scrolling Facebook instead. No big loss.

You're the one who thinks you're on a grand mission to deradicalize people on a forum with like 20 regular active users. I'd suggest you seek some help.
 
I didn't forget I was angry I wasn't allowed to close down this account mods made it clear I can not have this account deleted, anyway I do keep screen shot of everything
...I am trying to parse this, and no matter which way I do, it sounds like you are admitting you came here to stir shit up and try to get 'dirt' on people here for people elsewhere.

I mean, why else would you need a screenshot of everything, when you are the only one deleting massive (relatively) amounts of posts that do not cast you in a favorable light. You lurked for nearly two years, so you probably have this whole site (at least the publicly viewable bits) screenshotted, and are just now getting actively involved for your 'project' you were 'not getting paid enough' for.

Also, you do have the option to just deactivate your account, no mod involvement needed.
 
...I am trying to parse this, and no matter which way I do, it sounds like you are admitting you came here to stir shit up and try to get 'dirt' on people here for people elsewhere.

I mean, why else would you need a screenshot of everything, when you are the only one deleting massive (relatively) amounts of posts that do not cast you in a favorable light. You lurked for nearly two years, so you probably have this whole site (at least the publicly viewable bits) screenshotted, and are just now getting actively involved for your 'project' you were 'not getting paid enough' for.

Also, you do have the option to just deactivate your account, no mod involvement needed.
okay I'll slow this down
I'd try to frame it more charitably but close enough to the actual events this is what you'd think if I wasted my time to type it all out.


as to the account I did turn it off before, I wanted it gone couldn't do that without access to the account so I reactivated it
 
Last edited:
When the only evidence at all is "Alex Jones" said it, I consider that the exact same as no evidence at all. One person's claim is always shaky evidence, and he has lied and mislead so often, completely and shamelessly that he deserves absolutely no benefit of the doubt.
Yes, the same DoJ that has actively hidden exculpatory evidence about people from Jan 6th, and is protecting Epstein's clients, surely wouldn't try to hurt Jones in the most petty, mean spirited, and cruel way possible.

I absolutely believe the a Dem friendly court would try to classify the cat as an asset to be seized to pay the settlements forced on Jones.
 
Yes, the same DoJ that has actively hidden exculpatory evidence about people from Jan 6th, and is protecting Epstein's clients, surely wouldn't try to hurt Jones in the most petty, mean spirited, and cruel way possible.

I absolutely believe the a Dem friendly court would try to classify the cat as an asset to be seized to pay the settlements forced on Jones.
The thing is, Alex Jones has discredited himself so badly that something for which his testimony is the only evidence is automatically suspect, even if the claim is otherwise totally believable. I wouldn't take his word for what he had for breakfast.

edit: to be clear, by "suspect" I do not mean I reflexively believe the opposite of whatever Alex says. I mean I refuse to extend the level of trust I give to random strangers on the street.
 
Last edited:

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top