The Three Eagles - The Ottoman Empire in 1556 ADThe year is 1453. Constantinople has fallen. The last Byzantine Emperor, Constantine XI, despite his wish to die amongst his people as his nation died around him survived the siege and was brought before Mehmed II. There, he abdicated all titles of Roman Emperor and Caesar to the Ottoman Sultan. Mehmed II, encouraged by this victory of prestige as well, declared himself to be 'greater' than a mere sultan and declared his full title to be 'Sultanu-Selatin' or Selatin for short - which essentially meant 'Sultan of Sultans' alongside claiming the title of Roman Emperor and Caesar from Constantine XI. The last of the Byzantines was allowed to retire to Gallipoli where he lived out the rest of his life quietly, eventually marrying his daughter Maria to Mehmed II in 1459. 1453 was simply the beginning of the meteoric rise that the Ottomans had. The remnant states in the Peloponnese were rolled over by 1456 and the Trapuzentines surrendered in 1458 as well. By 1466, Mehmed II had defeated the last remnants of the Turkish beyliks in Anatolia and was now turning his attention somewhere else. Egypt. Egypt was a breadbasket of the eastern Mediterranean and was controlled by the fickle Mamluks who were antagonistic to the Ottomans. As a result, the Ottoman Selatin's conquest of the Aegean and Cyprus by 1475 was a gear-up for war with the Mamluks. And in 1477 it happened. The Ottomans and Mamluks, once again entered conflict due to border tensions, and this time, the conflict grew large. The Ottomans invaded deep into Syria whilst the Mamluks conducted a naval offensive that landed an invasion party on Cyprus, capturing half of the island before news arrived in 1480 that the Ottomans had captured Cairo. The Mamluk Sultan had retreated to Luxor and sued for peace, essentially annexing all of Syria and Northern Egypt into Ottoman lands by 1481.
![]()
Though this conquest via the Ottoman-Mamluk War of 1477 - 81 was great, Mehmed II was disappointed. The Ottoman invasion into Hejaz had been defeated, and the local tribes had formed a confederation known as the Council of Jeddah as Mamluke power waned in the region to protect the Abbasid Caliph and the Holy Cities. This made Mehmed II conduct a grand shift, as he finally gave up his plans for the Caliphate, acknowledging the Abbasid Caliph once again and this time focused fully on pushing the Ottoman claim to Rome. This led to conflict with the Hungarians, who were backed by the Papacy and the Holy Roman Empire and Venice, but this endeavor as well, only resulted in the annexation of Bosnia and the Danube into Ottoman hands. With the Christians warring on land on the Danubian frontier, Mehmed II unveiled his grand plan of invading Rome itself. In 1489, an Ottoman armada landed at Bari and soon Naples was swept into conflict as well. By 1497, at the Peace of Genoa, most of Naples and all of Sicily were ceded to the Ottomans as well. In 1498, Mehmed II died at the age of 66, having become known as the 'Conqueror' and the 'Great Eagle'. His successor and son, Cem I continued his father's legacy.
Crimea was annexed and vassalized under his early years, and a push towards the Caucasus to gain valuable natural resources like the abundant minerals of the area saw Georgia subsumed into the Ottomans, bringing the Astrakhan Khanate under Ottoman vassalization as well by 1510. Tripolitania, Tunis and Algiers was conquered by 1523, before the Great Ottoman War began in 1527 as after years of buildup, the Holy League attacked the Ottomans as a coalition, calling it the 'Final Crusade'. By the time Cem I died in 1531 AD, most of Hungary had fallen to the Ottomans. Cem I's successor and grandson, Selatin Iskender I proved to be just as competent as his grandfather and great-grandfather. The Great Ottoman War (1527 - 1548) ended in total Ottoman victory with Venice destroyed and rebuilt in the image of the Ottomans, and most of Italy under Ottoman control. Morroco was taken in 1552 and the Ottoman-Iberian War of (1549 - 1555) saw the Ottomans regain an Islamic foothold in Iberia as well. On December 27, 1556, Iskender I died, leaving the Ottoman Empire to his only remaining heir - Valide Asina Sultan - for the constant wars of the last century had ripped through the Ottoman dynasty. Selatina Asina I ascended to the throne upon the Instrument of Pragmatic Succession passed by her grandfather in 1554, and having married a distant cousin to solidify her claim to the throne, she now ruled the Ottoman Empire - which was now the undoubted Hegemon of the Mediterannean, which was finally recognized as the 'Third Roman Empire'.
thoughts and comments?
Map of the Commonwealth and its Dependent Territories-1912
![]()
General Information:
Official Name : The Commonwealth, the Crown of the Kingdom of Poland and its Colonies, the Grand Duchies of Lithuania, Ruthenia, Moscow, Karelia and Perm, the Duchies of Prussian, Inflants and Curonian Colonies and Belarus, the Free Siberian Lands, the Hetmanate of the Don, the Khanates of the Crimea and Kazan
Short Name: Commowealth/Rzeczypospolita
Hymn: Gaude Mater Polonia (Rejoice, Mother Poland)
Motto: Pro Fide, Lege et Rege (For Faith, Law and King)
Capital cities: Cracow (Crown, Royal) Warsaw (Administrative)
Official Languages: Polish, Latin, Polonian, Ruthenian, Lithuanian, German, Russian
Population: 293.4 million
King: Louis II
House of: Czartoryski
System: Elective Monarchy
Legislative Power: General Sejm
Advisory Body: Senate
Dominant Faiths: Roman Catholicism, Greek Catholicism, Orthodox, Evangelical, Jewish
Currency: Rzeczpospolita(Commowealth) Zloty
Well, this is the early 20th century, before the world wars. And it's kind of like the U.S. when the U.S. doesn't exist. Silesia will still return to the Motherland.Poland controls Vladivostok but still doesn't control Upper Silesia!
I really want to know how Weimar was able to pull off those territorial gains. Short of war that wouldn't have happened.The borders and territorial changes of a surviving Weimar Germany:
![]()
Weimar Forever - an Alternate History map by SRegan on DeviantArt
www.deviantart.com
![]()
What do you think, @sillygoose?
I really want to know how Weimar was able to pull off those territorial gains. Short of war that wouldn't have happened.
Poland, France, and the Czechs would never ever have let that happen, especially at those dates.
Weimar isn't going to rearm like Nazi Germany, but regardless Poland would go to war over any corridor crisis, so war is the only way to get back the corridor and Danzig and Weimar can't win that.Maybe the Danzig-Polish Corridor Crisis of 1939-1940 is the equivalent of the Sudeten Crisis in this TL? Though even then, it's more realistic for a compromise to be brokered where Poland gets to keep Gdynia while a land connection between Germany and East Prussia is provided for further south. This would leave Gdynia cut off from the rest of Poland, of course, but an extraterritorial road could solve that problem.
If rearmament begins on schedule, I could see this being the equivalent of our TL's Munich Agreement.
Weimar isn't going to rearm like Nazi Germany, but regardless Poland would go to war over any corridor crisis, so war is the only way to get back the corridor and Danzig and Weimar can't win that.
I'm saying Weimar wouldn't go to war due begin locked into the American system of world order. They certainly wanted revision, but didn't have the balls to go to war. The Soviet-German relationship had effectively ended before Hitler rose to power anyway, as the Soviets thought they had already gotten what they needed out of the relationship.So, Weimar's rearmament would take longer and thus war would break out later. That said, though, are you sure that an alliance of a rearmed Weimar and the Soviet Union won't be able to defeat Poland in, say, 1950 or 1955?
I really want to know how Weimar was able to pull off those territorial gains. Short of war that wouldn't have happened.
Poland, France, and the Czechs would never ever have let that happen, especially at those dates.
Hitler only achieved that by very aggressive actions and threats of war. No way Weimar would do anything of what Hitler risked.With the exception of Danzig and the connection to east Prussia all of those gains were made OTL without war. With a leadership less insane and violent than the Nazis they should still be possible in TTL. Without the betrayal of the annexation of the rump Czech state and a still democratic and legalistic Germany why would Britain and France support Poland against such limited demands - especially if steps to protect Polish access to the sea for economic purposes were included? Without western support and with Russia still the primary threat to the east its quite likely that Poland would give up without a fight.
Germany actually hide significant rearmament or at least clear breaches of the Versailles Treaty long before Hitler came to power and again they were planning what became known as the pocket battleships which again breached restraints under the Treaty. As such even with a much lighter level of rearmament - which would greatly aid the German economy compared to OTL - Germany should be able to achieve the targets on that map.