United States Anti-Semitism in the United States (and elsewhere)

CurtisLemay said:
www.breitbart.com

Pro-Palestinian Protesters Target Synagogues, Vandalize Church in Los Angeles

LOS ANGELES, California -- Pro-Palestinian protesters vandalized walls near synagogues, as well as a nearby church, with anti-Israel graffiti.
www.breitbart.com www.breitbart.com

In good news:
Click to expand...
Your country is simply late - it is Typical in western Europe.Now,when we would have german party ruling ,would become norm in Poland,too when they welcome muslims here.
And media would blame bad poles,of course.

But,in case you forget - Izraeli settlers were attacking christian churches in Jerusalem,and police did notching.

@Cherico - it is worst,they are marxists,not socialists.And,since they turned on jews at least once in XXth century,it is really strange that people are suprised.

As you said - everybody for them is tool,and would be discarded and destroyed in time - unless we stop them.
USA still have chance.You only need not to let them fake elections again.
 
Last edited:
Cherico said:
Socialists do not have friends they have tools they have not discarded yet.

I knew that the left would turn on us my entire life an I am unsurprised, to the black community? this will happen to you some day too.
Click to expand...

And I feel bad for the innocents who will get caught in the crossfire when they do.

That said: You might not hate them, but they absolutely hate you. Don’t forget it.
 
DarthOne said:
And I feel bad for the innocents who will get caught in the crossfire when they do.

That said: You might not hate them, but they absolutely hate you. Don’t forget it.
Click to expand...

agreed, when the time comes when people finally hate them as much as they hate everyone else that is when their end will come.
 
Harvard has lost a staggering $1 BILLION in donations over its handling of anti-Semitism on campus, alumni Bill Ackman claims as president Claudine Gay faces pressure to resign

www.dailymail.co.uk

Harvard has lost a staggering $1 BILLION in donations

Billionaire Bill Ackman is continuing his campaign for her removal of Harvard President Claudine Gay over her handling of campus antisemitism, arguing she's cost them donations.
www.dailymail.co.uk www.dailymail.co.uk
  • Gay, 53, survived a scheduled meeting of Harvard's board on Sunday amid calls for her removal, but her future at the Ivy league institution remains uncertain
  • Ackman claimed Gay's failures were not just matters of character but they were costing the school money
  • 'President Gay's failures have led to billions of dollars of cancelled, paused and withdrawn donations to the university,' Ackman stated

Billionaire Bill Ackman is continuing his campaign for the removal of Harvard President Claudine Gay over her handling of campus antisemitism, arguing she's cost the university significant funds.

Gay, 53, survived a scheduled meeting of Harvard's board on Sunday amid calls for her removal, but her future at the Ivy league institution remains uncertain after her disastrous congressional hearing.

In the letter sent by Ackman to his alma mater and posted to X on Sunday, he claimed Gay's testimony was not just a matter of character but they were costing the school money.

'President Gay's failures have led to billions of dollars of cancelled, paused, and withdrawn donations to the university,' Ackman wrote.

'I am personally aware of more than a billion dollars of terminated donations from a small group of Harvard's most generous Jewish and non-Jewish alumni,' he added.

'I have been copied and blind copied on numerous letters and emails to the University from alums who have written scathing letters to Gay and/or the Board withdrawing donations.'

Ackman accused Gay of 'doing more damage to Harvard's reputation than anyone in the university's history.'

The billionaire demanded the university's board of directors review Gay's history, including accusations of plagiarism, and of discriminatingly against those that don't fit the look of Diversity, Equity and Inclusion.

Ackman said: 'As Dean, Gay showed no respect for basic American legal principles when she fired Harvard Law School Professor Ronald Sullivan as residential dean for taking on the legal defense of Harvey Weinstein. President Gay should hope that someday when she needs counsel, she will be able to obtain quality representation for herself.'

Ackman also mentioned the case of former Winthrop House faculty dean Ronald Sullivan, who in 2019 accused Gay of dismissing him from his role because of his work on Harvey Weinstein's defense team.

The law professor, who was the first black dean of a Harvard school, accused Gay and Dean of the College Rakesh Khurana of lying about their motives for dismissing him when they claimed it was because he fostered a toxic work environment.

'The actions were cowardly and craven and Dean Gay and Dean Khurana just consistently and repeatedly lied to the student body and they know better,' he said, according to The Harvard Crimson.

'Their problem was that I represented an unpopular person... They said it to my face and other senior members said it to my face and then they turned around and lied to the student body.'

Harvard has denied the decision was because of Sullivan's work with Weinstein, which sparked protests on campus. Sullivan remains a law professor at Harvard.

In his letter to the Harvard board, Ackman also cited Harvard's plummeting in the Foundation for Individual Rights and Expression College Free Speech Rankings since Gay took over. While the school has never been high on the list, it reached its worst-ever ranking, landing at the very last spot.

The foundation said: 'Harvard completed its downward spiral in dramatic fashion, coming in dead last with the worst score ever: 0.00 out of a possible 100.00. This earns it the notorious distinction of being the only school ranked this year with an 'Abysmal' speech climate.'

Gay, a professor of Government and of African and African-American Studies, was inaugurated as Harvard's first black president back ink July. She has taken interest in DEI policies and created the Office of Equity, Diversity, Inclusion and Belonging.

Ackman claimed 'the actions of the OEDIB have led to preferences and favoritism for certain racial, gender, and LGBTQ+ groups at the expense of other groups, and made some members of the Harvard community feel included at the expense of others that are excluded.'

The billionaire was accused of racism when he suggested Gay had only been hired because she matched the DEO profile.

In his latest open letter, he said: 'I was recently accused by several bloggers and other commentators of being a racist when I shared that the board, in the search process that led to the hiring of President Gay, would not consider a candidate for president that did not meet DEI criteria.

'I have confirmed now from multiple sources that the search committee that led to President Gay's appointment excluded non-DEI eligible candidates from the process.'

DailyMail.com has not independently verified Ackman's claim.

Ackman has also shared accusations of plagiarism made against Gay by bloggers Christopher Rufo and Christopher Brunet, who claim the Harvard leader lifted identical wording for her 1997 dissertation.

The bloggers accuse Gay of using nearly verbatim language from authors Lawrence Bobo and Franklin Gilliam and scholar Carol Swain.

Swain reacted to the claims on Twitter, writing: 'I just learned of analysis of #ClaudineGay 's work and the allegations of plagiarism. I have not read the articles or books in question. However, two things come to mind: imitation is said to be the highest form of flattery and secondly Dr. Gay's committee, reviewers, and colleagues should have caught these alleged transgressions.'

The author added: 'I would like to know if [Gay] cited me in her published works on districting and representation. This would have had far more long term implications for my career. In academia we get rewarded on the basis of citations.'

Gay has apologized for her performance during last week's hearing, but the backlash has continued.

On Sunday two billboard trucks replaying her remarks to Congress were dispatched to the Massachusetts campus hours.

Gay, UPenn's Liz Magill and MIT's Sally Kornbluth were summoned before the House Committee on Education and the Workforce last week by lawmakers concerned by reports of a rise in antisemitism at leading universities.

They faced heated questioning from committee chair Congresswoman Elise Stefanik (R-NY) but failed to assert that calls for genocide against Jews on campus would definitively constitute harassment.

'This is only the very beginning of addressing the pervasive rot of antisemitism that has destroyed the most 'prestigious' higher education institutions in America,' Stefanik wrote on Saturday evening.

Adding: 'Harvard and MIT, do the right thing. The world is watching.'

Just minutes after Magill's statement announcing her departure, the chair of the Upenn's board of trustees, Scott Bok, also resigned.

Bok's Vice Chair, Julie Beren Platt, has been named interim chair of the board.

In a statement issued Saturday evening Magill wrote: 'It has been my privilege to serve as President of this remarkable institution.

'It has been an honor to work with our faculty, students, staff, alumni, and community members to advance Penn's vital missions.'

In his own resignation statement Bok defended Magill as a 'good person' who is 'not the slightest bit anti-Semitic' but had made a 'misstep' after 'months of relentless external attacks.'

Gay apologized for her remarks on Thursday as the backlash intensified, telling college newspaper The Crimson she 'got caught up in what had become at that point, an extended, combative exchange about policies and procedures.'

'What I should have had the presence of mind to do in that moment was return to my guiding truth, which is that calls for violence against our Jewish community - threats to our Jewish students - have no place at Harvard, and will never go unchallenged,' she added.
Click to expand...


 
Scottty said:
It means Islamic conquest of those lands, of course.
And I thought the secular left hated the idea of living under a theocracy...
Click to expand...
Iran is an interesting case study for that. Not many people know that Iran's leftists and communists originally helped overthrow the Shah. They were not happy with the revolution, but the theocracy made it very clear that their opinion doesn't matter.
Of course they though they would be the ones who end up in charge, but the theocrats were quicker and better prepared to grab power by force rather than political scheming.
 
Scottty said:
It means Islamic conquest of those lands, of course.
And I thought the secular left hated the idea of living under a theocracy...
Click to expand...
That and they think that Islam’s ‘bad behavior’ is just a ‘few radicals’ and that Islam can be assimilated into the West easily.

Basically a combination of (occasionally willful) ignorance, ‘muh blank slate’ theory when it comes to immigration and the whole ‘they’ll become more liberal thanks to democracy/ wealth/ etc’ nonsense.

That and of course the whole worldview of ‘oppressor vs oppressed’ with the oppressed always being the good guys. Probably also with side order of not having to deal with Islam themselves or only having come into contact with the ‘tame’ Islamists in the West.

Possibly also because they’re so used to being able to indoctrinate Christian kids to their side and being able to get away with pushing Christians around that they think they’ll manage to do the same is Islam.

Poor fools. They have no idea what they’re dealing with.
 
Scottty said:
It means Islamic conquest of those lands, of course.
And I thought the secular left hated the idea of living under a theocracy...
Click to expand...
Secular left belive that we still live in medieval Europe,and thus bad christians are major enemy.Dunno why.
Bad thing is - current Europe would fall.
Good thing is - except Germany,other european countries have decent chance to rise again - as christian states.
 
DarthOne said:
Basically a combination of (occasionally willful) ignorance, ‘muh blank slate’ theory when it comes to immigration and the whole ‘they’ll become more liberal thanks to democracy/ wealth/ etc’ nonsense.
Click to expand...
ATP said:
Secular left belive that we still live in medieval Europe,and thus bad christians are major enemy.Dunno why.
Bad thing is - current Europe would fall.
Good thing is - except Germany,other european countries have decent chance to rise again - as christian states.
Click to expand...
It is simply that the secular Left are delusional.

They believe that their worldview is the only correct one, nay, the only POSSIBLE one. And because that is so, all of the other deluded fools will accept it and then we will have an secular / atheist utopia worldwide.

It is old Commie bullshit all over again.
 
Aldarion said:
It is simply that the secular Left are delusional.

They believe that their worldview is the only correct one, nay, the only POSSIBLE one. And because that is so, all of the other deluded fools will accept it and then we will have an secular / atheist utopia worldwide.

It is old Commie bullshit all over again.
Click to expand...
True.It probably would lead to muslim Europe - but,when EU fall,everybody except germans would have some chance to be normal again.I hope,that at least Poland would not screw it....
 
Aldarion said:
It is simply that the secular Left are delusional.

They believe that their worldview is the only correct one, nay, the only POSSIBLE one. And because that is so, all of the other deluded fools will accept it and then we will have an secular / atheist utopia worldwide.

It is old Commie bullshit all over again.
Click to expand...

It ends with a pissed off majority purging the hell out of the left with violence.

All of the reasonable people in the right are being purged censored and in some cases murdered but the problems are not going away and getting worse, and the right are reproducing more then the left. This is a recipie for a populist right getting more and more extreme until it has enough power to take society.

And then vengence for generations of bullshit all at once.
 


Remember folks, according the intersectional Left, if your support Israel, you are the bad guy, even if you are trying to do environmental work.

The GOP can peel off the environmental lobby pretty easily now if they start taking the right cues from the Roosevelts.
 
Bacle said:


Remember folks, according the intersectional Left, if your support Israel, you are the bad guy, even if you are trying to do environmental work.

The GOP can peel off the environmental lobby pretty easily now if they start taking the right cues from the Roosevelts.
Click to expand...

See: Greta.
It seems that we have the definitive answer that the Arab/Soviet legacy alliance against Israel holds greater value to the orphaned children of the red flag than the cause of the green flag in the hierarchy. Hopefully it will help further compromise the reputation of the green flag with its constant efforts to ruin western economies.
 
Bacle said:


Remember folks, according the intersectional Left, if your support Israel, you are the bad guy, even if you are trying to do environmental work.

The GOP can peel off the environmental lobby pretty easily now if they start taking the right cues from the Roosevelts.
Click to expand...

Revolution always eat its children.Do not feel pity for him,he is liberal after all.It is good thing for normal peope when liberals start fighting each other.We should not intervene,but prepare popcorn.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Users who are viewing this thread

Total: 1 (members: 0, guests: 1)
Back
Top