only fair.
Actually its still merciful considering the shit that was done to us. These guys can find another job.
United States Biden administration policies and actions - megathread
- Thread starter Tyzuris
- Start date
only fair.
Actually its still merciful considering the shit that was done to us. These guys can find another job.
Arch Dornan
Oh, lovely. They've sent me a mo-ron.
They deserve worse but it won't happen.
Arch Dornan
Oh, lovely. They've sent me a mo-ron.
Media.
I don't mind using it. They're just going to fire them in disgrace because that's the way it works in the present.
Terthna
Professional Lurker
Personally, I'd rather we actually punish those who have committed crimes; instead of continuing to treat people of their status like they're above the law.
Arch Dornan
Oh, lovely. They've sent me a mo-ron.
There will be scape goats but I don't see what you think will happen so the only justice will be celebrations at their natural cause of death unless something changes.
Terthna
Professional Lurker
And so long as that remains the case, any so-called "purge" is little more than a placebo that will accomplish nothing in the long term.
Arch Dornan
Oh, lovely. They've sent me a mo-ron.
That one is hard to say. I can agree leaving corrupt elements alone means they can keep on growing and festering to metamorphise to something truly terrible even as the stabilizing elements continues to grow and strengthen the institutions they own when such growth can easily be destroyed and hard to repair.
Lord Sovereign
The resident Britbong
You'd rather put these powerful peoples's backs to the wall? They'd fight you to the finish and probably do something very stupid in the process. Quietly and calmly neutralising them by taking their jobs is far cleaner and gets your point across anyway. Having your job taken away for bad behaviour or getting up to the gills in dogma is threat enough for any bureaucrat. And mass sackings spook the ones still on your payroll into line whilst encouraging the loyalists.
That and the vast majority of these bureaucrats probably haven't done much wrong aside from being incompetent fat cats. Sacking is punishment enough.
mrttao
Well-known member
They are doing stupid things right now because they correctly know that nothing bad will ever happen to them no matter what they do. Examples need to be made
Sergeant Foley
Well-known member
The United States has a responsibility to defend our allies.Congress Rejects Biden’s Nuclear Rollback
Congress Rejects Biden’s Nuclear Rollback | National Review
archived 22 Jul 2022 10:34:01 UTCarchive.ph
Floridaman
Well-known member
Ehhh the US wasn’t supposed to have allies, the founders explicitly told us to separate ourselves from the old world lest we be destroyed.
Socialism ruins everything.
TriforcedLink
Well-known member
Unfortunately ambitious men with dreams of turning the US into a global hegemony empire took charge and led us to doing more then trading with the Europe. I sometimes wonder if the world would have been better off if we stayed out of the World Wars entirely and just focused on the new world.
It's not that we can't have allies, it's that
1. we can't make their needs greater than ours.
2. we can't make them eternal allies
1. we can't make their needs greater than ours.
2. we can't make them eternal allies
mrttao
Well-known member
The united states doesn't have allies because it keeps on betraying them the moment a reelection occurs
The liberal world order has allies, or more accurately branches, in other occupied countries. But they are not the allies of the USA.
The conservicucks try to make allies for the nation, but the moment they lose an election the liberals betray those allies.
The liberal world order has allies, or more accurately branches, in other occupied countries. But they are not the allies of the USA.
The conservicucks try to make allies for the nation, but the moment they lose an election the liberals betray those allies.
Sergeant Foley
Well-known member
You're blocked!
The first one yes. Second one, hell no. That was a war that needed to be fought.
StormEagle
Well-known member
Oh no. Whatever shall he do? He’s joined the half of the website that you have on your blocklist. Truly this is terrible!
Seriously, how many people do you have on ignore now? It must make reading this website terribly confusing sometimes.
LordsFire
Internet Wizard
There are key differences in the world from the time of the founders. When the USA was founded, the speed of sail, and dangers thereof, had bee more or less consistent (with slow marginal improvements) for 3-500 years.
Within eighty years, a single generous lifetime, the transit time for crossing the Atlantic changed from weeks to days. Within another thirty years, the reliability had drastically increased, and all of these things functionally caused the world to shrink.
By the time of WWII, aircraft were crossing the Atlantic in less than two days, and ten years later, less than a day was standard. By the sixties, missiles could cross the world in hours, rapid deployment forces could have brigades anywhere within 48 hours...
Staying completely out of foreign affairs simply is not possible anymore. Arguments can certainly be made that the amount of involvement could/should be sharply decreased, but staying out altogether is just this side of impossible.
It's also a recipe for national ruin, as with what happened to the Chinese after they went isolationist... I forget if it was in the 1400's or 1600's, and basically put their technological and social development in stasis, while Europe's dominance grew. Trade in both material and ideas matters.