CarlManvers2019
Writers Blocked Douchebag
Let it be remembered that even “outcasts” are not alone, the rest of “society” may sneer and think you below them, but what do their opinions matter when you can be happy on your own
Cultural destruction and White guilt
- Thread starter LifeisTiresome
- Start date
Let it be remembered that even “outcasts” are not alone, the rest of “society” may sneer and think you below them, but what do their opinions matter when you can be happy on your own
AnimalNoodles
Well-known member
All that is needed is solidarity. Imagine living in a town where everyone in a position of authority thinks like you, and actively shuns those who dont and works to keep it that way. You are free in that situation.
CarlManvers2019
Writers Blocked Douchebag
Towards a New Nerd Culture – Honey Badger Brigade
honeybadgerbrigade.com
Solidarity or a stronger "cultural identity" that would be able to resist being shamed by those outside, unlike these poor schmucks
LifeisTiresome
Well-known member
There we go. Stalin killed millions too. But its ok cause they like him and they like Communism so its ok. Its not about actual morality. Its never been about that.
They hate Churchill cause white male and they hate the west in general so he is included.
Last edited:
LifeisTiresome
Well-known member
Facts are racist!!!
It doesn't matter anyway. Nobody really cares about history. History exists only to find ways to guilt/shame people.
Again, Turkey has the right idea. West is utterly cucked.
DarthOne
☦️
We're still here and arguing about it. And Trump is slated to win the 2020 election by all signs.
So no, we aren't. Also, I wouldn't be taking Turkey's word for much.
PsihoKekec
Swashbuckling Accountant
There are multiple issues with Bengal famine. For starters there was enough food but panic started over rumors, so higher castes and speculants bought a lot more food than neccesary, creating shortage for poor people. And since British authorities in India had information about sufficient food stocks, they didn't take reports of starvation seriously at first and once they did, it took time or food shipments from other parts of empire to arrive, due to wartime shipping disruptions. But shitlibs never cared about the facts, only feelings, their feelings.
DarthOne
☦️
Maybe preface it with something about how they're literally falling for nazi propaganda?
LifeisTiresome
Well-known member
We shall see. I find this Trump will win for sure thing a bit presumptuous. He wins when he wins.
I meant that they were right in the policy of never apologizing and never submitting to caring about the feelings of those hurt by past events. As I have said, once you apologize, you open yourself up to more and more criticism and deconstruction until your foundation utterly becomes decayed and rotten.
LifeisTiresome
Well-known member
There have been "pranks" done where people read from the Mein Kamph and just replace Jews with white people and leftists cheered.
DarthOne
☦️
For sure? No, but ti's highly probable.
I'd argue that it has more to do with the wider subversion and undermining of western culture and traditions then just apologizing. Or at the very least, it has to do with the fact that people keep apologizing over the same things. We should just have stuck with 'okay, yes, we sort of screwed up with X a long time ago. It wasn't our proudest moment as a nation. Moving on now...'
Did anyone tell /show them after the fact that it was a one-word swap from Mein Kamph? And it's still worth a shot. I
d rather try and do something then sit around groaning about gloom and doom.
Arch Dornan
Oh, lovely. They've sent me a mo-ron.
It had something to also do with the war too as a factor?
LifeisTiresome
Well-known member
We shall see. I just think that you're declaring too early. Nothing is for sure now with all these riots and covid and all sorts of nonsense.
Its not just apologizing. Its the very act of acknowledging wrong doing. Turkey doesn't accept. They deflect and argue and leave things in limbo.
The West did exactly the bolded.
Once they did that, they now have to keep apologizing over and over again as showing off their submission and white guilt. As I said, once you accept wrong doing and apologize once. You create a crack that leftists will start to widen by constantly bombarding everyone about the bad things that you just admitted and creating endless deconstructions that further widen the crack until said pillar is decayed and rotten. Then it falls apart.
Yes, I believe it was revealed. They don't care.
Feminists have advocated before about reducing men to just 10% of the human population. Are you really surprised?
D
Deleted member 88
Guest
Arguing over the ackshually’s of history is pointless. It doesn’t matter whether or not Churchill thought badly about Indians or whatever-its not about historical accuracy. Don’t treat this as an academic dispute.
LifeisTiresome
Well-known member
Agreed. The facts don't matter. They decry Churchill cause millions dead but praise Stalin as if he doesn't have a bigger body count!
Its not about facts. Its not about morality. Its just demoralization and deconstruction.
DarthOne
☦️
As opposed to doing what? Just sitting back and doing nothing? Yeah, we might not be able to convince all the Far-Leftest, but we might get through to some of them and a good chunk of the moderates.
If a black man can convince people to leave the KKK by sitting down and talking to them, we can certainly TRY to do the same to the far left.
Last edited:
LordsFire
Internet Wizard
The mistake many in the west have made is not apologizing, it's assuming the people demanding the apologies are acting in good faith.
Rush Limbaugh, for example, has made apologies for when he's thought he overstepped boundaries. He apologizes, moves on, and completely ignores anyone who tries to keep bringing the issue back up again, instead talking about actual issues and the wrongdoing of the lft.
Go in prepared with examples of the left's wrong-doing, and rather letting them rant and rail at you endlessly, instead pull out facts about actual wrongs committed by the left, and demand they admit their own wrongdoing. For example, the riots and deaths in the riots after Floyd's death.
If they can't admit the left has problems too, tell them to their face they're dealing in bad faith. If they refuse to admit that groups like BLM go overboard, 'because it's okay when black people do it,' call them out as the racists they are demonstrably being.
The problem isn't admitting that there have been mistakes made. It's letting the other side control the narrative in the conversation you are having right then and there. There's little you can do about who controls the media, but you can control some of the discourse you are directly engaged in.
Rush Limbaugh, for example, has made apologies for when he's thought he overstepped boundaries. He apologizes, moves on, and completely ignores anyone who tries to keep bringing the issue back up again, instead talking about actual issues and the wrongdoing of the lft.
Go in prepared with examples of the left's wrong-doing, and rather letting them rant and rail at you endlessly, instead pull out facts about actual wrongs committed by the left, and demand they admit their own wrongdoing. For example, the riots and deaths in the riots after Floyd's death.
If they can't admit the left has problems too, tell them to their face they're dealing in bad faith. If they refuse to admit that groups like BLM go overboard, 'because it's okay when black people do it,' call them out as the racists they are demonstrably being.
The problem isn't admitting that there have been mistakes made. It's letting the other side control the narrative in the conversation you are having right then and there. There's little you can do about who controls the media, but you can control some of the discourse you are directly engaged in.
DarthOne
☦️
EXACTLY! Thank you for putting that into better words then I could.