• The 'Comrade' title is now available in a fetching communist red for purchase by all of you capitalists who survived the Sietch gulag during the people's revolution. And in the spirit of all communists everywhere, it was broken until the capitalist pig dogs fixed it. ;)
  • Your beloved Boot here with a confession. The Boot tangled its laces and failed to properly set up the new Comrade user title. Thanks to the kind intercession of Emperor Tippy this failure has been corrected and the new user title is now actually on sale to everybody.

Election 2020 Election Fraud: Let's face it, this year will be a shitshow

Typhonis

Well-known member
Joined
Aug 22, 2019
Reaction score
1,705
Location
Lagrange point between Pluto and Charon
So, Megadeath, what should happen when several states violate the Constitution? Disregard what it says to do as they wish? The Constitution states a state's legislature is final authority on how an election shall be held but this was not the case in at least four states. Judges and governors gave orders which is against the Constitution. So what should happen?
 

Hlaalu Agent

Nerevar going to let you down
Founder
Joined
Aug 11, 2019
Reaction score
4,767
Location
Rethan Manor
The size of the cheer leading team does not, and should not be any kind of factor in a court case. There was other more explicit posts made before, that the cheerleading squad size does matter because public opinion can pressure courts to take a case and "seriously consider" it. It sounds like the kind of revolutionary drivel that presaged Robespierre.

When the "law & order" party believes courts should be governed by the will of the people rather than law, when the "states rights" party are celebrating state on state legal action to reduce those rights, when the "freedom of expression" crowd is baying for blood over politicians making statements that could uncharitable be interpreted as calls for violence or persecution whilst ignoring very similar messaging from their favourite president...

Well, actions speak louder than words, and the actions don't line up with the high minded ideals their words support. Sad.
You are quite clearly projecting, sad. It is perfectly in character for a law and order party to wish to overturn a potentially unlawful election. And really, this obviously isn't anything you said. And all you show is your hypocrisy, you try to nail us on supposed behavior that your side is 100% guilty of. As I said, projection, very obvious, much sad.
 

Megadeath

Well-known member
Joined
Nov 28, 2020
Reaction score
289
So, Megadeath, what should happen when several states violate the Constitution? Disregard what it says to do as they wish? The Constitution states a state's legislature is final authority on how an election shall be held but this was not the case in at least four states. Judges and governors gave orders which is against the Constitution. So what should happen?
If there was a belief that a change violated the constitution, it should have been acted on immediately. If the state executive has usurped power reserved for the state legislature, then it should be that state legislature taking that action. The remedial action taken should never be such that millions of voters are disenfranchised, in violation of that states own law.

You are quite clearly projecting, sad. It is perfectly in character for a law and order party to wish to overturn a potentially unlawful election. And really, this obviously isn't anything you said. And all you show is your hypocrisy, you try to nail us on supposed behavior that your side is 100% guilty of. As I said, projection, very obvious, much sad.
Uh huh, except once again, talk of "your side" is misguided. I'm not a Democrat or even an American. Nor do people have such simplistic views that some kind of two side split is meaningful. There's plenty of people on the left I object to and disagree with, and though I probably do swing slightly more left on more of the hot topic domestic issues, there's others where I swing far to the right.

Regardless, if your only response to criticism of an issue is ad hominem deflection it makes it look like either you have nothing valid and useful to say, or you're more interested in garnering imaginary points for "your side."
 

Greengrass

Well-known member
Joined
Aug 26, 2019
Reaction score
199
As I expected, the Supreme Court denied the Texas case due to lack of standing.



Thomas and Alito, as usual, would have granted leave to file because they basically always say that they think the Supreme Court has to take any cases that claim to be state-to-state, but don't say anything about the merits or mootness (though the "would not grant other relief" suggests they also agree the claimed "facts" of the case are nonsense)
 

Chaos Marine

Well-known member
Joined
Aug 11, 2019
Reaction score
2,105
Location
Ireland.
I'm genuinely curious if they find enough fraud to show that the election for these states were stolen. Like, will other states be obliged to check their records? Will they refuse?

If the accusation that the Maricopa county's officials deleted the election database, is that grounds enough to look further into it? Can they be arrested for that? Aren't election results supposed to be retained just in case? Everything about this is hilariously more suspicious by the moment.
 

Duke Nukem

Hail to the king baby
Joined
Sep 4, 2019
Reaction score
16,674
Should I post info on the Arizona audit here or just make a new thread for it?
 

f1onagher

Well-known member
Joined
Aug 21, 2019
Reaction score
2,498
The BBC has an item on the recount currently, with the helpful headline of "The story of Arizona's 'ridiculous" election recount" on the US & Canada page but loses the editorialization in the headline for the article page Arizona recount: Why Republicans are still tallying votes
Remember to archive links before sharing them. It doesn't matter if its an angry click or a gleeful click its still money in the parasites' pockets.

As for the actual story, if I had any doubts about the veracity of Arizona's elections the quite frankly seditious extremes the Democrats have gone to in order to spoil it would have convinced me otherwise.
 

Bacle

When the venture is no longer profitable...
Founder
Joined
Aug 12, 2019
Reaction score
12,538

So Dominion and Maricopa County are trying to veto the election audit by refusing to hand over the passwords to certain routers and machines, despite the AZ State Senate ordering them to and designating the Cyber Ninja's to conduct the audit.

This mess is showing why it is going to be very hard to ever figure out the real results of 2020's election, and how far the voting machine companies believe their power extends.
 

Zachowon

The Army Life for me! The POG life for me!
Founder
Joined
Aug 12, 2019
Reaction score
12,160
They have to give up a lot in thier lawsuit against My pillow guy.
So it would be better to do it now instead of then
 

LindyAF

Well-known member
Joined
Jan 3, 2021
Reaction score
2,324
They have to give up a lot in thier lawsuit against My pillow guy.
So it would be better to do it now instead of then
They say the issue is the firm doing the auditing, not giving up the passwords in general, which they say they have already done before with a different firm. (I only use "they say" here because I haven't verified it myself, I have no reason to think otherwise).
 

Zachowon

The Army Life for me! The POG life for me!
Founder
Joined
Aug 12, 2019
Reaction score
12,160
Do they? Because it seems like nobody has the power to force them to do so.
Wouldn't a judge's warrant be sufficient?
Yes, a judge warrant should do
They say the issue is the firm doing the auditing, not giving up the passwords in general, which they say they have already done before with a different firm. (I only use "they say" here because I haven't verified it myself, I have no reason to think otherwise).
Ahh
 
Top Bottom