Election 2020 Election Fraud: Let's face it, this year will be a shitshow

Rocinante

Russian Bot
Founder
Well, it seems to me there's a fairly big difference between "This thing could suggest there was fraud." and "Clearly, they're afraid it was fraudulent themselves." That's not just semantics, the difference between something being suggestive and something being clear is fairly meaningful.
I would have accepted "clearly trump is afraid they'd find collusion," as a reasonable response to Trump obstructing the investigation too, up until it was revealed that it was a complete farce.
 

Megadeath

Well-known member
I would have accepted "clearly trump is afraid they'd find collusion," as a reasonable response to Trump obstructing the investigation too, up until it was revealed that it was a complete farce.
But how can something "clearly" be the case, when it's wrong?
 

Rocinante

Russian Bot
Founder
But how can something "clearly" be the case, when it's wrong?
People can still be wrong when utilizing sound logic.

They would have been wrong, but I would have accepted the logic up until they were proven to be wrong.

It's not enough to convict someone or anything like that. But it's enough to Make a statement of what you believe. I believe this current situation indicates that the democrats believe they have something to hide. They doesn't mean they are without a doubt guilty. That's the purpose of the investigation. But if they interfere with the investigation that would exonerate them if they were innocent, it's logical to assume they're trying to hide something.

Does this not make sense to you? (Rhetorical question, I've seen you post enough to know you just like to stir up arguments)
 

S'task

Renegade Philosopher
Administrator
Staff Member
Founder
In related news:

Election audit in small New Hampshire town could have implications for 2020 results statewide | Just The News

According to the election night tally, Democratic candidate Kristi St. Laurent fell short of winning her seat by just 24 votes. But, after a hand recount conducted by the secretary of state on Nov. 12, St. Laurent's deficit widened significantly from 24 votes (.005%) to 420 votes (9.6%). The results of the race were unchanged, but the recount showed that each Republican on the slate had been shorted about 300 votes, and votes for St. Laurent had been overcounted by 99 votes.

When errors all go in ONE direction, it gets suspicious. Gotta wonder what was going on there, and the small town and state of New Hampshire is looking into it.
 

Rocinante

Russian Bot
Founder

JagerIV

Well-known member
I would have accepted "clearly trump is afraid they'd find collusion," as a reasonable response to Trump obstructing the investigation too, up until it was revealed that it was a complete farce.

Eh, I think it depends how early you think it became obvious the whole thing was a baseless fishing expedition. After all, Trump did cooperate quite extensively with the investigation. Of course, the Flynn thing happened very early in the process. Actually, looking it up the Flynn nonsense occurred before the investigation had even begun.

Though we should also remember that the muller investigation built on the earlier Crossfire Hurricane which started in July 2016. And, plus, well, the Muller investiation was in large parked, at least officially, kicked off by the "scandal" of Trump firing James Comey. Which sets off fairly early that the whole thing was bullshit.

So, thinking the thing was a farce was a fairly reasonable assumption by 2017, and the investigation didn't wrap up until 2019.

Loyalists of America, I think you shall soon have your smoking gun.

I mean, we won't have a smoking gun until its something that CNN would acknowledge as undeniable proof. Thus, a smoking gun is impossible.
 

Bacle

When the effort is no longer profitable...
Founder
Is there a larger context for this? More than a random tweet?
Not from this person, or at least not as part of a thread.

But I've been a lot of stuff about more and more irregularities showing up related to audits across the country, and this one seemed worth noting.

I'll try to find it, but there was also a New Hampshire audit for a GOP person that won by like 24 votes, and the audit found like another 300 for them.
 

S'task

Renegade Philosopher
Administrator
Staff Member
Founder

Rocinante

Russian Bot
Founder
Question if election fraud is found. What CAN be done?
What is likely to be done, is we just let it go, but get more support to pass laws to tighten election security in some red/mixed areas.

Blue areas? Nothing happens. The media will claim it's a lie and conspiracy theory, even if we find irrefutable proof, because the media blatantly lies regularly, and is the democrat's propaganda arm. Biden stays president. Half the country still believes it's fake news.

We could probably try to impeach. But that just gives us Kamala. part of me suspects they picked Kamala just so we don't impeach President House Plant.
 

Duke Nukem

Hail to the king baby

Users who are viewing this thread

Top