Five minutes of hate news

[Abhorsen]

Congress is trying to reenact racial quotas:

Congress is Preparing to Restore Quotas in College Admissions

More than two-thirds of Americans think the Supreme Court was right to hold Harvard's race-based admissions policy unlawful. But the minority who disagree

reason.com

There's a disparate impact test in the American Privacy Rights Act. As usual, the bills name has little to do with it's content.

 

[mrttao]

Congress is trying to reenact racial quotas:

Congress is Preparing to Restore Quotas in College Admissions

More than two-thirds of Americans think the Supreme Court was right to hold Harvard's race-based admissions policy unlawful. But the minority who disagree

reason.com

There's a disparate impact test in the American Privacy Rights Act. As usual, the bills name has little to do with it's content.

> Privacy bill
> Imposes race quotas on universities and everyone else too for good measure.

fucking congress

 

[TheRejectionist]

TLDR : France wants to do to New Caledonia what they have done to mainland France. The new law would essentially make any Frenchmen that go there and stay for ten years to be able to vote in local elections, which any French citizen can do since New Caledonia is a French territory so they rioted and apparently they are bringing 2700 policemen there just to quell the riots and banning TikTok as well...because reasons?

 

[Zachowon]

TLDR : France wants to do to New Caledonia what they have done to mainland France. The new law would essentially make any Frenchmen that go there and stay for ten years to be able to vote in local elections, which any French citizen can do since New Caledonia is a French territory so they rioted and apparently they are bringing 2700 policemen there just to quell the riots and banning TikTok as well...because reasons?

Thr Chinese are letting it be used as a means to protest and form resistance groups in yhe west

 

[SoliFortissimi]

I hope the Turks kick their ass. I dislike Turkey, but France delenda est. Only when those bastards in Paris are humbled and broken, and crawl on their stomachs to the POTUS and get laughed off, only then will I have anything but malice for them.

 

[DarthOne]

 

[DarthOne]

Socialist Member of Chicago City Council Thinks the Idea of Punishing Criminals is ‘Racist’ and Calls America a ‘Garbage Society’

Socialist Member of Chicago City Council Thinks the Idea of Punishing Criminals is 'Racist' and Calls America a 'Garbage Society' | The Gateway Pundit | by Mike LaChance

Rossana Rodriguez, a self-described socialist serving on Chicago’s city council, believes the idea of punishing criminals is racist.

www.thegatewaypundit.com

Socialist Chicago council member says it’s ‘racist’ to punish criminals, America is a ‘garbage society’

A socialist member of Chicago’s city council believes that the idea of using police to ensure safe streets and punishing criminals is “racist” while calling America a “garbage society.”

Rossana Rodriguez is an alderwoman on Chicago’s city council who supports defunding the police and caucuses with the Democratic Socialists. The alderwoman, who explicitly calls for “critical race theory” to be taught to children, is also involved in the council’s Education and Child Development committee.

The alderwoman repeatedly blasts American society in her frequent social media tirades.

According to the councilmember, America is “a garbage society” and “a White supremacist society and system” that “favors White people.” Rodriguez believes that “White people are ahead in the game” in comparison to minority groups…

“When we say #DefundThePolice we mean developing alternatives to racist punishment and brutality. This work has been around for a while and it’s a great tool to rethink our ideas of what public safety should look like,” Rodrigues said in response to a post about “police abolition” in 2020.

One could argue Chicago is a garbage society for not punishing criminals. Step 1) raise taxes. 2) raise crime. 3) get everyone to flee. 4) buy up properties. 5) get tough on crime. 6) lower taxes to get people back. 7) profit, because you or your friends bought up the properties.


ALSO:

“Your punishment for having a knife when they searched you would be very different from the thief’s. For him to have a knife was mere misbehavior, tradition, he didn’t know any better. But for you to have one was ‘terrorism.’”
-Aleksandr I. Solzhenitsyn, The Gulag Archipelago


In the Criminal Code of 1926 there was a most stupid Article 139 – “on the limits of necessary self-defense” —according to which you had the right to unsheath your knife only after the criminal’s knife was hovering over you. And you could stab him only after he had stabbed you. And otherwise you would be the one put on trial. (And there was no article in our legislation saying that the greater criminal was the one who attacked someone weaker than himself.)

This fear of exceeding the measure of necessary self-defense lead to total spinelessness as a national characteristic. A hoodlum once began to beat up the Red Army man Aleksandr Zakharov outside a club. Zakharov took out a folding penknife and killed the hoodlum.

And for this he got….ten years for plain murder! “And what was I supposed to do?” he asked, astonished. Prosecutor Artsishevsky replied: “You should have fled!”

So tell me, who creates hoodlums?
-Aleksandr I. Solzhenitsyn, The Gulag Archipelago, Volume 2: An Experiment in Literary Investigation, 1918-1956.

 

[Zachowon]

Clownfish go from male to female interestingly enough

 

[Skitzyfrenic]

Clownfish go from male to female interestingly enough

As do a number of other animals. A number of frog and toad species, for instance.

That doesn't make them trans or queer.

Because those are social constructs (using their rhetoric), and social constructs require society to construct them.

The bisexual lions that we're supposed to celebrate and emulate? Also practice infanticide and cannibalism. Totally worth emulating.

(How many lions actually engage in such behavior? How often do Clownfish actually change their sex?)

Most importantly, these animals are not human animals. What works for them, what's good for them, is not necessarily good for us.

It's the usual leftist cherry picking of things from context, and then placing it a new context, going YAS KWEEN, and making it lame and gay. All so they can jutsify their predatory behavior, because even in the trailer it's like 'yas we shud all have moar seggs!' with shit like Hyena clit girl dicks as the reasoning.

Dolphins will fuck fish corpses to masturbate. Totally, necrophilia is great. Corpses aren't alive so they don't need to give consent.

Otters will gang rape baby seals to death. Obviously, this means that pedophilia and non-con are perfectly fine.

And so on.

 

[Zachowon]

As do a number of other animals. A number of frog and toad species, for instance.

That doesn't make them trans or queer.

Because those are social constructs (using their rhetoric), and social constructs require society to construct them.

The bisexual lions that we're supposed to celebrate and emulate? Also practice infanticide and cannibalism. Totally worth emulating.

(How many lions actually engage in such behavior? How often do Clownfish actually change their sex?)

Most importantly, these animals are not human animals. What works for them, what's good for them, is not necessarily good for us.

It's the usual leftist cherry picking of things from context, and then placing it a new context, going YAS KWEEN, and making it lame and gay. All so they can jutsify their predatory behavior, because even in the trailer it's like 'yas we shud all have moar seggs!' with shit like Hyena clit girl dicks as the reasoning.

Dolphins will fuck fish corpses to masturbate. Totally, necrophilia is great. Corpses aren't alive so they don't need to give consent.

Otters will gang rape baby seals to death. Obviously, this means that pedophilia and non-con are perfectly fine.

And so on.

I think they are going to focus on things like the clownfish as examples
Because it fits the narrative normies cam accept

 

[DarthOne]

I think they are going to focus on things like the clownfish as examples
Because it fits the narrative normies cam accept

And we can beat the over the head with the stuff mentioned previously and that ‘natural is good’ is in fact a logical fallacy.

 

[Jormungandr]

And, of course, the agenda behind such a "documentary" is pretty obvious.

Fucking groomers.

 

[mrttao]

And we can beat the over the head with the stuff mentioned previously and that ‘natural is good’ is in fact a logical fallacy.

Those propaganda films also don't care about the actual factual stuff of what is and isn't natural.

Like, they see one dog humping literally anything. including legs, sofas, and other males. and they conclude "this is a gay dog. therefore dogs have gays. therefore gays are natural".

and that is when they don't just flat out make up shit.

 

[DarthOne]

And, of course, the agenda behind such a "documentary" is pretty obvious.

Fucking groomers.

The pendulum grows heavier.

Tick-toc-tick-toc.

 

[Zachowon]

And we can beat the over the head with the stuff mentioned previously and that ‘natural is good’ is in fact a logical fallacy.

Oh I agree.
Just pointing out they could have named it so many ithers things and then went into the biology and how it is diffrent from humans. They want, but it would honestly be a great show to help understand why humans CANT.

 

[TheRejectionist]

I hope the Turks kick their ass. I dislike Turkey, but France delenda est. Only when those bastards in Paris are humbled and broken, and crawl on their stomachs to the POTUS and get laughed off, only then will I have anything but malice for them.

I want both of their elites to get their teeths kicked in so the Mediterranean countries can chill for like...5 minutes.

 

[Abhorsen]

You can actually get to "gay behavior is an evolutionary adaptation" pretty easily due to kin selection and lowering competition for mates (this is likely why third sons are more likely to be gay in humans). So an argument that it's natural isn't hard to make.

This doesn't extend to trans stuff though, as they cite clownfish and stuff, which have radically different biology, and the transition is done biologically, not socially.

It's a Motte and Bailey, basically, with the gay stuff being defensible, but not the trans stuff.

 

[The Whispering Monk]

...this is likely why third sons are more lukely tobe gay in humans...

what?

 

[Abhorsen]

what?

Fraternal birth order and male sexual orientation - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

It's from the 90s, and people found evidence for it from the 50s, so it's before the worst of the woke stuff, but yes, the later on in birth order a male is compared to his brothers, the more likely they are to be gay.

It probably has to do with a combo of kin selection + lowering competition for mates. Kin selection is because a brother is the genetic equivalent of a son, and this applies even more broadly than you'd think, on the level of tribes or larger (remember, each gene combo is in competition with each other possible choice for that position, so yes, all the redhead genes are working together in some sense).

Mate competition is a good thing for the species as a whole and for the opposite sex of the competition, but a bad thing for an individual or a small group of the same sex that shares a ton of genes. In that case, the eldest child is likely the healthiest (as the parents were younger and likely more fit when they had him, and there was less competition between siblings for food during development), and thus the most likely to succeed, so siblings bowing out of the competition is a good thing.

How do they bow out? Well, they end up gay. How? Well, the mother does have higher antibody levels to a specific protein for each son they had had before, so that might be it. Note that this is an environmental cause, not a genetic cause, despite it's effect being "born gay" instead of becoming gay after birth, as the environment causing gayness is the womb.

 

[mrttao]

what?

Allegedly women's immune system learns to attack male hormones from repeated exposure from bearing sons. Causing reduced prenatal testosterone in each followup son.

Being born with low testosterone allegedly statistically translates into higher chance of being gay.

These are "facts" I used to just accept but I am now rather suspicious of considering the massive amount of fraudulent LGBTQP propgaganda that comes out of universities.

On top of those sus facts, the LGBTQP propaganda machine has decided to interpret "followup sons have slightly lower prenatal testosterone levels" into "3rd sons are born gay".