Not reallyso no one thinks it's just a case of an abused law?
Not reallyso no one thinks it's just a case of an abused law?
That "truism" is almost always wrong.Never associate with malice what can be explained with stupidity it seems.
Possible but I still think that it's more likely that either we are missing some important facts, or there's some corruption going on.so no one thinks it's just a case of an abused law?
That "truism" is almost always wrong.
It is meant to trick gullible people into not looking too hard at the malicious who rule them. Almost always it is actual malice
Here's an interesting bit of news. A teenager by the name of Cayler Ellingson was recently murdered in North Dakota for his political beliefs, specifically because he was a Republican.
Police: Driver admitted to intentionally killing teen at North Dakota street dance after political dispute
This is the natural result of the Democrats calling their political enemies fascists and enemies of democracy. This is also probably the intended result. I expect this sort of thing become more common as time goes on.
At least since this happened in North Dakota Ellingson's family has a chance at getting justice. I hope the murderer gets the death penalty, or at the very least life in prison.
The max for what he's been charged with is 20yrs. He wasn't charged with murder even though that's probably an open and shut guilty verdict based on the article.I hope they throw the book at this fucker.
I just hope that it’s enough to dissuade any copy-cats. Because this is a pandora’s box better left unopened any further.I hope they throw the book at this fucker.
It's been open for at least two years nowI just hope that it’s enough to dissuade any copy-cats. Because this is a pandora’s box better left unopened any further.
Hence why I said ‘unopened any further’.It's been open for at least two years now
That "truism" is almost always wrong.
It is meant to trick gullible people into not looking too hard at the malicious who rule them. Almost always it is actual malice
I hope they throw the book at this fucker.
WCTrib said:A judge ordered Brandt held on $50,000, which he objected, saying he's not a flight risk.
"I have a job, a life and a house and things I don't want to see go by the wayside — family that are very important to me," Brandt told the judge.
It's exactly because he did it over politics that's the reason they're not going as hard on him; the establishment wants to encourage this sort of behavior, if only towards what they consider the right targets.I don't understand why he wasn't charged with murder, especially given how that semi driver who accidentally killed someone because he had his nose in his phone was treated. They gave him a 108 year sentence. Meanwhile this fucker does it on purpose over politics and at worst he might face 20?
He got the default charges to hold him while they investigate. I read this as the DA testing the waters. Depending on what the investigation pulls up, well this could get wild. They just need to be sure it wasn't a neo-nazi who declared fatwa on the driver or something silly before they go all in.I don't understand why he wasn't charged with murder, especially given how that semi driver who accidentally killed someone because he had his nose in his phone was treated. They gave him a 108 year sentence. Meanwhile this fucker does it on purpose over politics and at worst he might face 20?
They are considering adding stronger charges from what I've read. The initial charges seem to be obvious ones designed to get an arrest. Basically, what @WolfBear said.I don't understand why he wasn't charged with murder, especially given how that semi driver who accidentally killed someone because he had his nose in his phone was treated. They gave him a 108 year sentence. Meanwhile this fucker does it on purpose over politics and at worst he might face 20?
They are considering adding stronger charges from what I've read. The initial charges seem to be obvious ones designed to get an arrest. Basically, what @WolfBear said.