What proof does she have to back up her claim?
Impeachment
- Thread starter Cherico
- Start date
What proof does she have to back up her claim?
Well she is the White House correspondent for One America News Network, who Trump has been promoting for a bit (even before Fox started turning against the GOP), so I expect she has access to both industry and White House sources.
It also jives with with what I've seen of many 'polls' that are against Trump (all the way back to the beginning of his presidential run) being highly biased in terms of who is sampled and what questions are asked.
I do not have access to more than her Twitter feed, but what she is saying fits in with a lot of previous 'polling', and media bias, issues surrounding Trump.
I am sure she does have access to Industry and White House sources.
But the questions are whether she is being honest about it and whether the sources themselves used good methodology.
ShadowsOfParadox
Well-known member
eh, have you SEEN the protests? Dem's in Dem strongholds have been getting BOOED by Dem Voters when they speak of impeachment.
The only people who want impeachment are nuts.
That's... Nice.
But it still doesn't allow us to check whether she's being honest/accurate with her twitter claims
Lanmandragon
Well-known member
See I go the other way on this. The pollsters not those who distrust them. Need to prove thier legit and not purposely tainting the results. Because trusting the MSM just isn't a thing I'm going to do.
Francis Urquhart
Well-known member
Do you have a background in data analysis?
King Krávoka
An infection of Your universe.
You can't just say that without video links.
I don't trust pollsters who refuse to show their methodology either.
No, but I know enough about it to spot bad methodology.
Well there's been an update on that poll information. I'm not versed enough in polling to say much but it seems the concerns that the poll wasn't 100% accurate were warranted.
You mean the media known for peddling Fake News has published Fake News again? Color me surprised. No, really, I'm shocked.
Francis Urquhart
Well-known member
Obviously not.
Well, that certainly confirms the bad methodology of the poll.
Given nobody actually linked the poll to check.
almostinsane
Well-known member
They're holding back on the vote.
Bigking321
Well-known member
Well, obviously.
If they started a impeachment for real it would all be public and then everyone would see they have nothing.
They are better off calling what they are doing impeachment, keeping everything secret, and going on a massive fishing expedition hoping they find something.
Same as the Muller thing.
After the election, when they have all this evidence guys, really he's doomed, just waiting on the official report, it will be them admitting there isn't any actual evidence, and they will end up not impeaching.
If they started a impeachment for real it would all be public and then everyone would see they have nothing.
They are better off calling what they are doing impeachment, keeping everything secret, and going on a massive fishing expedition hoping they find something.
Same as the Muller thing.
After the election, when they have all this evidence guys, really he's doomed, just waiting on the official report, it will be them admitting there isn't any actual evidence, and they will end up not impeaching.
That's called a coup. Or the arrest and unjust imprisonment of a political enemy. That kind of thing is done by tinpot tyrants and commies. So no suprise there, and President Trump should eliminate the demorats before they try to come after him with trumped up charges when his presidency is over.
...please stop shooting conservatives, and this forum, in the foot with this sort of rhetoric.
I agree the Dems will likely go after Trump after he leaves office, and likely will hound him the rest of his life trying to get him on something. They may also go after Trump supporters, after he leaves office, and could push this country to the brink of a 2nd Civil War. I think doing what he can to depower the Dems, or at least the Far-Left, in the long-term is in the best interests of the US as a whole.
But 'eliminating' them...that only really has one connotation, one which a German like you should be very damn aware of and how it looks. No one should cheer for an American Reichstag Fire, or what comes after it.
That's what I was trying to say. The Democrats will hound him for the rest of his life, and try to put him in front of a kangaroo court. It's in his own interest to prevent them from being able to do so.
I have no doubt they will try to start not a Reichstag Fire but the same civil war that led to the communists getting in charge of the UdSSR, and it would behove people to be prepared for that eventuality.
Last edited:
D
Deleted member
Guest
It's interesting to speculate on whether or not part of the reason for holding back on the vote is that Pelosi knew that Cummings, who was her main front-man for impeachment, was near death. The Maryland Congressman died today at the age of 68.
StormEagle
Well-known member
My condolences to whatever family he has, for whatever that’s worth.