Movies Marvel Cinematic Universe

Husky_Khan

The Dog Whistler... I mean Whisperer.
Founder
James Spader's Ultron maybe coming back to the MCU. Specifically the Armor Wars thing they are planning which will star Don Cheadle as War Machine (and probably Riri/Ironheart as well).

 

ParadiseLost

Well-known member
I can't take Don Cheadle seriously as a superhero or as the main lead of a Marvel movie.

Maybe he'll grow into it.

Ultron was one of my favorite Marvel villains, but I'm not really into Marvel anymore anyway. I'm more excited about the Spider-man 2 game (and even more excited about the Wolverine game) than any Marvel movie.
 

Husky_Khan

The Dog Whistler... I mean Whisperer.
Founder
I can't take Don Cheadle seriously as a superhero or as the main lead of a Marvel movie.

Maybe he'll grow into it.

Ultron was one of my favorite Marvel villains, but I'm not really into Marvel anymore anyway. I'm more excited about the Spider-man 2 game (and even more excited about the Wolverine game) than any Marvel movie.

I love Ultron as a Marvel villain generally... mostly in concept but some of his stories have been pretty awesome. But Avengers: Ultron Unlimited was pretty meh in regards to Ultron IMHO.

And Don Cheadle can definitely lead a movie but I would agree... seeing him as a Marvel lead just isn't something I can envision with that character. He'd more appropriately lead a more ensemble style cast IMHO. Armor Wars is so far off though it hasn't even entered pre-production though so there's plenty of time for it to rise or fall.
 

prinCZess

Warrior, Writer, Performer, Perv
Terrance Howard was a bright-spot in the (already good) first Iron Man that, rude as it maybe is to say, is just a better actor than Cheadle. Marvel/Disney really screwed the pooch in not getting him back (whatever the drama around it was).
 

ShadowArxxy

Well-known member
Comrade
Terrance Howard was a bright-spot in the (already good) first Iron Man that, rude as it maybe is to say, is just a better actor than Cheadle. Marvel/Disney really screwed the pooch in not getting him back (whatever the drama around it was).
As I understand it, the drama was that Howard was paid $4.5 million for the first Iron Man film, with contract options for two more movies, and was supposed to get $8 million for the second. Instead, the studio said the contract options were non binding and they were only willing to pay him $1 million because they weren’t getting RDJ at a “career rehab discount" anymore.
 

Husky_Khan

The Dog Whistler... I mean Whisperer.
Founder
Terrance Howard was a bright-spot in the (already good) first Iron Man that, rude as it maybe is to say, is just a better actor than Cheadle. Marvel/Disney really screwed the pooch in not getting him back (whatever the drama around it was).

I don't mind Terence Howard as an actor and maybe he'd be a better fit but I think Don Cheadle is actually a superior Actor overall. And I dug him in Ironman 2 and so forth.

Marvel screwing over people for multi film deals seems standard to be honest. According to a YouTube video I just saw Terence Howard was apparently expecting like $8 million for the next movie (and he was the highest paid actor in the first one) but Disney figured that people wouldn't care as much about who was IronMans best friend in the sequel and unfortunately for Howard they were right.

They paid Cheadle like a quarter what they would've paid Terence Howard and now Cheadle has apparently made millions in his fifty or whatever Marvel films and shows he's starred in.

Maybe Terence Howard has more of a main star feel in a Superhero movie though. That's possible.
 

Agent23

Ни шагу назад!
Terrance Howard was a bright-spot in the (already good) first Iron Man that, rude as it maybe is to say, is just a better actor than Cheadle. Marvel/Disney really screwed the pooch in not getting him back (whatever the drama around it was).
Only actor I remember from Iron Man 1 is Robert Downey Jr. I can't even remember which celeb played Pepper Potts.

It was an alright movie IMHO, one of the first capeshits, but I have always liked Iron Man.
He, Bats and Spiderman were always the only superheroes I cared about as a kid, with Deadpool being the only one that got added since.

Technically Spawn should be there, too, but he is more of an anti-Hero.
 

ParadiseLost

Well-known member
Disney figured that people wouldn't care as much about who was IronMans best friend in the sequel and unfortunately for Howard they were right.

I feel like that was always kinda obvious, though.

I mean, paying someone $4.5 million for what is ultimately a fairly minor role seems a bit excessive for Howard, who while a successful actor is not really a household name.
 

ShadowArxxy

Well-known member
Comrade
I feel like that was always kinda obvious, though.

I mean, paying someone $4.5 million for what is ultimately a fairly minor role seems a bit excessive for Howard, who while a successful actor is not really a household name.

The thing is, at the time of Iron Man, RDJ was seriously damaged goods as an actor; everyone knew he was immensely talented, but he also had a massively well-known history of chronic substance abuse issues, and had not done any really big roles since his last stint in rehab. He wasn't as high-risk as 2003 when he was fresh out of rehab and Mel Gibson had to pay out of pocket to cover him for The Singing Detective because every completion bond company considered him untouchable, but it was still a huge gamble giving a blockbuster lead role to someone with that kind of history.

Given RDJ's compromised status, Howard was actually the biggest name attached to the movie, and his contract was essentially negotiated as a co-lead.
 

Husky_Khan

The Dog Whistler... I mean Whisperer.
Founder
I feel like that was always kinda obvious, though.

I mean, paying someone $4.5 million for what is ultimately a fairly minor role seems a bit excessive for Howard, who while a successful actor is not really a household name.

Yeah Howard really overrated himself I feel. He was bigger then but Cheadle I feel was just as successful if not as appropriate. According to Wikipedia (referencing a Cheadle interview) Howard apparently beat him out for the role in the first movie.

Plus Ironman followed the formula of Sony's Spider-man in casting Sam Rockwell Robert Downey Jr for the lead role despite not being a A-Lister at the time. Helped set the trend of the Hero, not the actor, being the main draw.

I think RDJ is finding that out in his post-Marvel career a bit. :p
 

ParadiseLost

Well-known member
I think RDJ is finding that out in his post-Marvel career a bit. :p
Eh, RDJ was the biggest paid Marvel character by a lot*, and I don't think its entirely a coincidence that I haven't really been into Marvel since the death of Iron Man.

* His pay was literally a double digit percentage of every Avengers movie budget.

Avengers: $45 mil
Age of Ultron: $80 mil
Infinity War: $66 mil
Endgame: $75 mil

For comparison, Chris Hemsworth:
Avengers: $3 mil
Age of Ultron: $5 mil
Infinity War: $15 mil
Endgame: $15 mil

I really hope Sherlock Holmes 3 happens. Apparently its up to RDJ.
 

Emperor Tippy

Merchant of Death
Super Moderator
Staff Member
Founder
The MCU worked because you had a collection of movies that each could stand on their own reasonably well and a decent way to tie them together.

Ironman, Thor, Hulk, and Cap all got their own movies (two of them in the case of Iron Man) with the SHIELD people tied in relatively well as supporting stars in the various other movies.

Personally, I would have done a Widow & Barton focused movie in there as well but whatever.

Then you had Avengers and it had three relatively strong leads story wise in Tony, Steve, and Thor. The story was relatively simple, the acting and CGI was well done, and the universe worked relatively well.

Then you had the problems start. Thor 2 just doesn't really make sense in a lot of ways, I mean you have aliens attacking London and yet Thor is the only one responding. It was also basically totally ignored by everyone else in the MCU.

You had Iron Man 3 which could work just fine on its own but is, again, largely ignored and doesn't really pass the smell test when it comes to the broader MCU. The President was kidnapped, the Vice President was cutting deals with terrorists, some tiny ass corporation was creating Cap/Cap+ tier super soldiers enmass, Tony Stark was presumed assassinated and the CEO of SI kidnapped at the same time. And yet no appearances from any of the rest of the crowd and it was all basically ignored by the broader universe afterwards.

Then you had Winter Soldier. Again, on its own its a mostly decent movie. Except it was the vehicle used to progress the meta plot and the movie in this phase with (far and away) the most relevance going forward. And in the broader context of the MCU, it was a fucking stupid movie and plot. The easiest solution would have been to take WS and end it with the presumed death of Fury and Cap & Widow on the run. Have Avengers 2 start immediately afterword's with Cap & Widow gathering the Avengers and them as a collective whole dealing with Hydra and the takeover of SHIELD. Enter Wanda and Pietro as part of Hydra's "Avengers" team that has Bucky at the head.

Instead we had WS into Age of Ultron and with it the abortion of the MCU. AoU worked relatively well on its own, but it led basically straight into Civil War.


Civil War as the last movie of that Phase (after Strange and Black Panther, and maybe concurrent with Thor 3) might have worked. But instead you basically go AoU to CW and CW royally fucks things up. Wanda is a Hydra terrorist who should have been executed for her actions, instead she was thrown into the Avengers. Cap suddenly decided that all oversight or caring about the little people was beneath him and only his friends matter. Black Panther is thrown in to set up his own movie and yet in the process makes him a fucking idiot who should become an international pariah instead of any kind of leader. Vision just doesn't get the screen time really needed to set him up properly. And Tony is forced into the role of bad guy despite being the reasonable, sane, adult in the room.

Black Panther and Strange were basically stand alone movies with minimal to no connection to the broader MCU ecosystem. Spiderman was also brought in with his own movie, but there were no Hulk, Ironman, Vision, Widow, Wanda, or Hawkeye movies.

Simultaneously, the underlying MCU meta verse was drastically expanded. You had Strange bringing in magic in a big way and you had Ragnarok suddenly taking the Asgardians from advanced aliens into actual gods (despite denying that in Thor 1). And you had Guardians of the Galaxy bringing in Ego.

All of it flows into Infinity Wars/Endgame which kinda just collapses under the weight of an unstable foundation.

And IW/Endgame were handled really fucking badly in terms of impact on the setting. Half the worlds population vanished at the end of IW. Realistically, another 25% probably died as a direct consequence of that. Nations don't survive that kind of thing. And then five years later all those billions of people Snapped away suddenly pop back up. At least half of them are going to die in the immediate aftermath of that simply because the infrastructure will no longer exist to support them.

Food production post Snap is going to drop drastically because only half as many mouths have to be fed. It takes an entire growing season (absolute best case, assuming that all of the needed infrastructure is already in place) to substantially increase food production because it takes that long to grow the food in the first place. People starve in less than that growing season. You suddenly threw ~3.5 billion more mouths to feed into the world with no warning or preparation. That is another event that, in addition to killing a billion plus people, will collapse governments the world over.

Basically,
Phase 1: Great
Phase 2: Pretty solid in a lot of respects but on a downward trend
Phase 3: What the fucking fuck?
Phase 4+: Meh, really not worth watching as anything but individual stand alone movies that might or might not be any good.

If I could change things, I would have reordered Phase 3 in a big way. Black Panther occurs before Civil War, and probably tie in Barton and/or Widow or (maybe) Vision. Strange occurs pre Civil War and tie in Wanda, with a fair bit of character growth to overcome the mind controlling terrorist problem. Thor 3 is, again, off Earth and probably has Hulk or Vision and I would tie it in with the Guardians of the Galaxy focused more fully on Thanos.

Tie together Spiderman, Ant-Man, and IM 4 into one or two movies as a kinda minnie arc. Take the opportunity to show more of the politics of Enhanced and start really setting up for Civil War while also getting people more established for Thanos.

If Civil War must occur then rewrite it so that Cap has an actually reasonable position and is less of a selfish terrorist who is an insult to the word Hero. Or play fully into that theme and don't try and make Cap into the good guy, instead have it be his fall from grace with him realizing how he has fucked up when he has Tony on the ground and is about to kill him with his shield and Cap and Bucky go off to find themselves.

Infinity War is basically fine as it is. Thanos wrecks Asgard and attacks Earth basically a day or two after the warning of the attack arrives. The Snap happens, the team tracks down and kills Thanos.

Then you have a few movies dealing with all of this. Put Iron Man 4 in here and have it be about Tony Stark seeing no choice but to really embrace his power as he works to hold the world together. Governments have collapsed and someone needs to hold civilization together in the face of billions dead and sheer chaos. Have IM4 be about dealing with the high level consequences of the Snap and Tony's grief over it all (and the death of Peter). At the same time, have a Cap focused movie dealing much more with the ground level consequences of the Snap and dealing with the warlords and quasi warlords using their powers to try and make themselves the local power.

Then comes Endgame. Show them actually preparing for the return (and maybe staggering it, so that say only 10% of the people per year, randomly selected, reappear and they do so next to friends/family/etc.).

Post Endgame movies deal with a very different world. Maybe take the opportunity to add Mutants to the MCU, make it a side effect of the Snap.
 

Husky_Khan

The Dog Whistler... I mean Whisperer.
Founder
Eh, RDJ was the biggest paid Marvel character by a lot*, and I don't think its entirely a coincidence that I haven't really been into Marvel since the death of Iron Man.

* His pay was literally a double digit percentage of every Avengers movie budget.

Avengers: $45 mil
Age of Ultron: $80 mil
Infinity War: $66 mil
Endgame: $75 mil

For comparison, Chris Hemsworth:
Avengers: $3 mil
Age of Ultron: $5 mil
Infinity War: $15 mil
Endgame: $15 mil

I really hope Sherlock Holmes 3 happens. Apparently its up to RDJ.

Yeah the Sherlock Holmes franchise films were successful but I was thinking of Doolittle and to a lesser extent The Judge which were both unsuccessful. Oppenheimer looks to be pretty solid though with Christopher Nolan directing and a big cast alongside RDJ.

RDJ is a star but I don't think his star power is reliably translating to strong box offices like the few top tier Actors that are left like Tom Cruise or Will Smith or Brad Pitt or whatever. Sometimes they release a stinker but usually they can find success independent of an established franchise.

Anthony Mackie kinda touched on it I think and I think the whole celebrity thing is becoming more rarefied. People watch movies for the characters the actors are playing.

 
The MCU worked because you had a collection of movies that each could stand on their own reasonably well and a decent way to tie them together.

Ironman, Thor, Hulk, and Cap all got their own movies (two of them in the case of Iron Man) with the SHIELD people tied in relatively well as supporting stars in the various other movies.

Personally, I would have done a Widow & Barton focused movie in there as well but whatever.

Then you had Avengers and it had three relatively strong leads story wise in Tony, Steve, and Thor. The story was relatively simple, the acting and CGI was well done, and the universe worked relatively well.

Then you had the problems start. Thor 2 just doesn't really make sense in a lot of ways, I mean you have aliens attacking London and yet Thor is the only one responding. It was also basically totally ignored by everyone else in the MCU.

You had Iron Man 3 which could work just fine on its own but is, again, largely ignored and doesn't really pass the smell test when it comes to the broader MCU. The President was kidnapped, the Vice President was cutting deals with terrorists, some tiny ass corporation was creating Cap/Cap+ tier super soldiers enmass, Tony Stark was presumed assassinated and the CEO of SI kidnapped at the same time. And yet no appearances from any of the rest of the crowd and it was all basically ignored by the broader universe afterwards.

Then you had Winter Soldier. Again, on its own its a mostly decent movie. Except it was the vehicle used to progress the meta plot and the movie in this phase with (far and away) the most relevance going forward. And in the broader context of the MCU, it was a fucking stupid movie and plot. The easiest solution would have been to take WS and end it with the presumed death of Fury and Cap & Widow on the run. Have Avengers 2 start immediately afterword's with Cap & Widow gathering the Avengers and them as a collective whole dealing with Hydra and the takeover of SHIELD. Enter Wanda and Pietro as part of Hydra's "Avengers" team that has Bucky at the head.

Instead we had WS into Age of Ultron and with it the abortion of the MCU. AoU worked relatively well on its own, but it led basically straight into Civil War.


Civil War as the last movie of that Phase (after Strange and Black Panther, and maybe concurrent with Thor 3) might have worked. But instead you basically go AoU to CW and CW royally fucks things up. Wanda is a Hydra terrorist who should have been executed for her actions, instead she was thrown into the Avengers. Cap suddenly decided that all oversight or caring about the little people was beneath him and only his friends matter. Black Panther is thrown in to set up his own movie and yet in the process makes him a fucking idiot who should become an international pariah instead of any kind of leader. Vision just doesn't get the screen time really needed to set him up properly. And Tony is forced into the role of bad guy despite being the reasonable, sane, adult in the room.

Black Panther and Strange were basically stand alone movies with minimal to no connection to the broader MCU ecosystem. Spiderman was also brought in with his own movie, but there were no Hulk, Ironman, Vision, Widow, Wanda, or Hawkeye movies.

Simultaneously, the underlying MCU meta verse was drastically expanded. You had Strange bringing in magic in a big way and you had Ragnarok suddenly taking the Asgardians from advanced aliens into actual gods (despite denying that in Thor 1). And you had Guardians of the Galaxy bringing in Ego.

All of it flows into Infinity Wars/Endgame which kinda just collapses under the weight of an unstable foundation.

And IW/Endgame were handled really fucking badly in terms of impact on the setting. Half the worlds population vanished at the end of IW. Realistically, another 25% probably died as a direct consequence of that. Nations don't survive that kind of thing. And then five years later all those billions of people Snapped away suddenly pop back up. At least half of them are going to die in the immediate aftermath of that simply because the infrastructure will no longer exist to support them.

Food production post Snap is going to drop drastically because only half as many mouths have to be fed. It takes an entire growing season (absolute best case, assuming that all of the needed infrastructure is already in place) to substantially increase food production because it takes that long to grow the food in the first place. People starve in less than that growing season. You suddenly threw ~3.5 billion more mouths to feed into the world with no warning or preparation. That is another event that, in addition to killing a billion plus people, will collapse governments the world over.

Basically,
Phase 1: Great
Phase 2: Pretty solid in a lot of respects but on a downward trend
Phase 3: What the fucking fuck?
Phase 4+: Meh, really not worth watching as anything but individual stand alone movies that might or might not be any good.

If I could change things, I would have reordered Phase 3 in a big way. Black Panther occurs before Civil War, and probably tie in Barton and/or Widow or (maybe) Vision. Strange occurs pre Civil War and tie in Wanda, with a fair bit of character growth to overcome the mind controlling terrorist problem. Thor 3 is, again, off Earth and probably has Hulk or Vision and I would tie it in with the Guardians of the Galaxy focused more fully on Thanos.

Tie together Spiderman, Ant-Man, and IM 4 into one or two movies as a kinda minnie arc. Take the opportunity to show more of the politics of Enhanced and start really setting up for Civil War while also getting people more established for Thanos.

If Civil War must occur then rewrite it so that Cap has an actually reasonable position and is less of a selfish terrorist who is an insult to the word Hero. Or play fully into that theme and don't try and make Cap into the good guy, instead have it be his fall from grace with him realizing how he has fucked up when he has Tony on the ground and is about to kill him with his shield and Cap and Bucky go off to find themselves.

Infinity War is basically fine as it is. Thanos wrecks Asgard and attacks Earth basically a day or two after the warning of the attack arrives. The Snap happens, the team tracks down and kills Thanos.

Then you have a few movies dealing with all of this. Put Iron Man 4 in here and have it be about Tony Stark seeing no choice but to really embrace his power as he works to hold the world together. Governments have collapsed and someone needs to hold civilization together in the face of billions dead and sheer chaos. Have IM4 be about dealing with the high level consequences of the Snap and Tony's grief over it all (and the death of Peter). At the same time, have a Cap focused movie dealing much more with the ground level consequences of the Snap and dealing with the warlords and quasi warlords using their powers to try and make themselves the local power.

Then comes Endgame. Show them actually preparing for the return (and maybe staggering it, so that say only 10% of the people per year, randomly selected, reappear and they do so next to friends/family/etc.).

Post Endgame movies deal with a very different world. Maybe take the opportunity to add Mutants to the MCU, make it a side effect of the Snap.

honestly in hindsight I would have just left it at phase one, at the point they started making stakes intangible (Rewriting all of reality with literally at the snap of a finger) while at the same time trying to make the audiance invested the consequences as if they were tangible that's when they lose people like me. (Then again I'm frankly one of those people that reads Warhammer and goes "Will the meta gods just destroy this universe already?)
In the time it takes me to write this sentence I have erased and reconstituted the universe 150 times. How do you in-universe prepare for something like that realistically and out-of-universe get invested in something like that realistically, the answer to both these questions is that you don't.

It would have been one thing if these movies were always meant to be purely spectacle porn or personal dramas like their comic counterparts and you weren't really meant to care about the world outside of the characters themselves (Yes we know this is unrealistic but we'll at least make it fun), but Phase 1 was literally Marvel telling DC "I'll take your Dark Knight and raise you an Avengers." It wasn't dark and gritty (nor should have been) but it was personal and tangible. Once IM3 came along that was lost not only did everything have to be a globe-spanning threat of the week that had to be solved by individual heroes to give the illusion of some sort of personal stake and it's just gradually gotten worse and worse. We went from personal/national crises to global crises to galactic crises to universal crises to existential crises. Except we're supposed to have the same amount of empathy and emotional investment into the existential crises that we do the personal/national crises.

I'm writing a superman type character and one of her powers is that she can open a dimension to a lifeless mirror universe that she uses as a battlefield when fighting other gods, that way reality itself can't fall apart even with the heroes present and things have as much a personal stake as anything (is the Hero going to survive.


TL;DR be careful when trying to make a "Dramatic" story. it's easy to make the scales and stakes too big and the MCU accomplished that about three or even 4 phases ago.
 

Husky_Khan

The Dog Whistler... I mean Whisperer.
Founder
Saw Antman: Quantumania with some younglings. It was very much a wasted movie.

The whole setting was just a CGI Fest. Just alien landscapes filled with stuff... or weird generic alien deserts... lots of random aliens and creatures but there's no rhyme or rhythm or reason or ecology or anything. Just things thrown on the screen. Characters just thrown on the screen. There's a War going on... more noise. I get no sense of the civilizations or cities or major players. It's just a jumble of shallow one note characters who are mildly interesting at best, can fulfill humorous quips and generally well acted.

I noticed Katy O'Brien was Daturana... or whatever her name is... the local Rebel leader. She did fine I guess.

The cast was fine. I liked the main cast including Kathryn Newton even if Cassandra Lang is basically a little Rebel Social Justice Advocate in the beginning of the story. I didn't mind it as much... but the dunking on Scott Lang at the family dinner was a bit overbearing. And while I did enjoy Cassie's story development and how she was working with Scott and Hope on the Quantum Realm, I felt Janet/Michelle Pfeiffer's role and defensiveness was forced and didn't make any sense really. Like she somehow has a complete lack of faith in her Husband, daughter and son-in-law it's... painfully bad.

Oh Bill Murray's character was a complete waste of space. Didn't even need to bring him in except for clout. Completely waste.

And MODOK was shit. Not even the hilariously bad CGI face... just as a character in general. It's the worst interpretation of a really corny villain period. Like the complete inverse of one of the greatest villains of the MCU, Arnim Zola.

What really killed this movie is the HUMOR! Oh my gosh... it was funny oftentimes... but it ruined the movie. Not every movie has to be Guardians of the Galaxy but that's what the MCU is now. Observable humor and comedy was always a nice aside that occurred in the MCU but everyone wants to be lameass James Gunn now that it's a fucking curse. You get all of these dramatic moments and then someone is like... let's replicate Thor: Ragnarok and add some juvenile smartass comment or something to ruin the pacing and atmosphere.

The lack of depth and originality in the film was bad enough but the Humor just stabbed you in the gut whenever you were trying to get into the film. It was like being prison shanked repeatedly... just when your like... Oh this is interesting. This is moving. STAB STAB STAB/funny oneliners.

I will give credit the movie ruining humor was better in this film than other Marval MCU films like Black Panther where it's just bad and cringe. And the amorphous worldbuilding in the Quantum Realm was way better then that of Black Panther as well.

What is truly frustrating was that there was SO MUCH GOOD in this film.

The cast was great. They acted well in front of their perpetual greenscreens and with the shitty worldbuilding and setting. Some of the details of the setting were awesome. On an individual level there were cool NPC's... errr minor characters or living buildings... ants doing shit.

What's really tragic... I think Kang the Conqueror was an amazing villain. No wait, let me correct that. He COULD OF been an amazing villain. But everything else, like MODOK and whatever, dragged him down. Kang's introduction and development in the scenes with Janet Van Dyne were great and well done and I typically LOATHE stories told via flashback. Jonathan Majors did a great job with this iteration of Kang and I say this after thinking his iteration of Kang in Loki was shit and helped ruin that TV series which was pretty mid in and of itself. Kang was great. Well portrayed. Well acted. A real threat with really evil menace and presence. I thought he was great. Things held him back in the film but... it couldn't be helped. He had a lot of potential which again, wasted on this film.

Final thought.

Film studios need to learn how to do a "Big Cinematic Battle" again. It was just a big old brawl with people running and shooting at each other again like the Avengers Phase 3 films or Aquaman or whatever. There's no real sense of scale or tactics or tempo or geography like you get with the original Lord of the Rings movies or even the Chitauri invasion in the original Avengers movie. There were some cool parts, like how Giant-Man was able to put his full Kaiju form to good and creative use in the final battle. But not having a proper battle also limited things, like when Kang decided to show just how badass he was and there wasn't any real army for him to shred apart like think of the iconic scene of Sauron in the opening of Lord of the Rings, we needed that but didn't get it.

Overall giving it a 5 out of 10 rating seems really appropriate.
 


and I'm honestly reminded why part of me is seriously considering quitting being creative...because I can't stand what the average person likes...and the average person can't stand what I like. sadly I don't get to have the privilege of being born into wealth like the aristocrats in Hollywood.
 

Husky_Khan

The Dog Whistler... I mean Whisperer.
Founder
Marvels Secret Invasion trailer was released two weeks ago.





Another trailer released for Secret Invasion bringing the return of Samuel L. Jackson as Nick Fury and from the trailer it seems Emilia Clarke, Martin Freeman, Don Cheadle and a lot of other familiar faces are showing up.

The trailer for me certainly looks great but Marvel Television shows have had a steady theme of being exceptionally underwhelming productions pretty much every time. We'll see if this show had the production values to match the vision implied in the solid trailer.
 

Husky_Khan

The Dog Whistler... I mean Whisperer.
Founder
Coming out on November of 2023!

The Marvels



Oh boy, it looks like so much obnoxious humor will help spice up this film. 😐
 

Husky_Khan

The Dog Whistler... I mean Whisperer.
Founder
Guardians of the Galaxy Volume 3.

Saw bits of Reviews from Red Letter Media, Chris Stuckmann and Critical Drinker who both seem to think Guardians of the Galaxy 3 is actually pretty good (though not great). And I can tell from the thumbnails that Nerdrotic and others seem to think it's good as well though I didn't see his review. Not everyones been positive from skimming over the YouTube search results but many seem to be.

Which is interesting because I actually had no real interest in seeing the movie myself mainly due to a case of not really caring. The good reviews kinda make me interested in watching it, but unless someone drags me along, I do think I'll still wait for it to end up somewhere... likely Disney Plus, which I no longer technically have but still have relatively easy access to. :p

Anyone here see it yet?
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Top