NATO Military News

Croatia took delivery of the first Rafale:

English sources:
 
Croatia took delivery of the first Rafale:

English sources:
Good choice,but Gripen for Poland is still better.
 
Just... how? You will talk about politics, but how are French and Swedish politics any less fucked up?
About working from roads,when airfields are destroyed.And that would happen,when another Democrat would sell us to Moscov,and they attack us with german idiots.
 
About working from roads,when airfields are destroyed.
Most other planes can do it too, while being better in many other ways. By your logic we should go back to prop planes because they don't even need a road, just dirt.
And that would happen,when another Democrat would sell us to Moscov,and they attack us with german idiots.
So you would rather be sold by French or Swedes, ok.
 
Most other planes can do it too, while being better in many other ways. By your logic we should go back to prop planes because they don't even need a road, just dirt.

So you would rather be sold by French or Swedes, ok.
1.F18 and some F35 variants - yes.F16 and F15 - no
2. You do not read my post,or do not undarstandt it.USA are only reason why kgb do not attacked us yet,when France and Sweden do not have army strong enough to defend themselves.

Thus USA could sell us to Moscov,becouse they hhave power to help us,too.
When both France and Sweden lost their power long ago.

And Democrat president would sell us/or gave up for free/ becouse that is part of their heritage.
So,we must be prepared for that hour - with planes capable of working from roads.
Which mean - not USA,unless we buy their Navy planes.
 
1.F18 and some F35 variants - yes.F16 and F15 - no
F-16 we already have logistics for and contrary to some rumors it can work from highways.
In fact out own air force trains that.

2. You do not read my post,or do not undarstandt it.USA are only reason why kgb do not attacked us yet,when France and Sweden do not have army strong enough to defend themselves.

Thus USA could sell us to Moscov,becouse they hhave power to help us,too.
When both France and Sweden lost their power long ago.
Which means they can be threatened or bribed more easily. Look at how France took few months of delay before they supplied anything meaningful to Ukraine.
 
Slovakia has been making some purchases recently. Most notably a Barak Medium Range Air Defense System from Israel, thirty six Piorun MANPADs from Poland and five thousand Colt M4A1 Assault Carbines WITH ACCESSORIES from the United States of America.



The Barak MX was developed alongside the Barak 8 with assistance from India but the MX system is Israeli designed so they can tailor it for other countries export requirements. The MX system has recently been purchased by Colombia and Morocco with other countries ranging from Finland to the UAE and Vietnam expressing interest in the system.
 
Slovakia has been making some purchases recently. Most notably a Barak Medium Range Air Defense System from Israel, thirty six Piorun MANPADs from Poland and five thousand Colt M4A1 Assault Carbines WITH ACCESSORIES from the United States of America.



The Barak MX was developed alongside the Barak 8 with assistance from India but the MX system is Israeli designed so they can tailor it for other countries export requirements. The MX system has recently been purchased by Colombia and Morocco with other countries ranging from Finland to the UAE and Vietnam expressing interest in the system.

That's a very interesting combo of equipment. Why so diverse?
 
That's a very interesting combo of equipment. Why so diverse?

Slovakia donated its S-300 and SA-6 Air Defenses to Ukraine a while ago so the US operates Patriot Missile Batteries in Slovakia to provide the country air defense until they can acquire a replacement. I'm guessing the Barak is meant to be (at least in part) that replacement.

The Pioruns make sense because they're advanced MANPADs made by Poland and like the Barak is a pretty modern system. I don't even think Slovakia has many modern or functional MANPADs in service generally speaking and one of the alternatives, Stinger missiles I'm guessing have a backlog of production/purchasing. Plus they have good press from their use in Ukraine shooting down Russian helicopters and planes on video. The M4's I'm guessing will go to elite and special forces style units. Probably just diversify away from all of the Czech stuff they currently use.
 
The M4's I'm guessing will go to elite and special forces style units. Probably just diversify away from all of the Czech stuff they currently use.
Now I think if I was the current or previous gov of SVK I would have gone with the latest IMI TAVOR or the MSBS Grot B.
 
A lot of Eastern European nations, even those not in NATO, are re-arming, updating their equipment, or buying replacements.

Gee, I wonder why? :ROFLMAO: Russia really shot itself in the foot here, given its apparent long-term aims and goals.
 
F-16 we already have logistics for and contrary to some rumors it can work from highways.
In fact out own air force trains that.
Don't F-16s have issues with narrow and very lightly built landing gear? Meaning you can use them from highways, but watch out for accident rate... there is a reason why that is called "first F-16 highway strip landing ever".
 
Don't F-16s have issues with narrow and very lightly built landing gear? Meaning you can use them from highways, but watch out for accident rate... there is a reason why that is called "first F-16 highway strip landing ever".
First in Poland.
Taiwan also did it:
Yeah, you need quality highway and cleaning to limit accidents, but for wartime scenario, the risk is not too bad.
 
F-16 we already have logistics for and contrary to some rumors it can work from highways.
In fact out own air force trains that.


Which means they can be threatened or bribed more easily. Look at how France took few months of delay before they supplied anything meaningful to Ukraine.
1.Gripen is still better in that regard
2.Sweden and France could be bribed,but USA lead by Democrats would gave us for notching,like FDR and Truman.
And,considering that deep state faked one election there,i except Democrats ruling to the end of USA.Would be 2040 ,i quess.
 
1.Gripen is still better in that regard
But its worse in other regards, some not fixable, like the logistics of not being the most common western fighter in the world, and some fixable at great cost (see: fully modernized Gripen price), at which point the option to get more F-35's becomes attractive. Some people think that might be cheaper, holy fuck.
The FA-50 idea is not bad either, it's based on a plane meant to be sold to third world countries due to being cheap (and it really is cheap which is another benefit) and easy to run, so if it handles crappy bases it should handle improvised ones too.
2.Sweden and France could be bribed,but USA lead by Democrats would gave us for notching,like FDR and Truman.
It's not that hard to imagine why they didn't want to fight World War 2.5.
And,considering that deep state faked one election there,i except Democrats ruling to the end of USA.Would be 2040 ,i quess.
Again with your wild guesses.
 
Last edited:
Again with your wild guesses.
Considering how Republicans apparently sabotaged Trump... it is not long until Uniparty is official.

Era of Communist dictatorship is coming to the USA.
 
Ah, so perhaps "end of USA by 2040" in the same sense that "KGBstan killed Russia". I still don't buy it but it's less unbelievable than the USA actually ceasing to exist as a recognizable geopolitical entity by then.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top