What stood out to me the instant I saw that link unfurled was their choice of wording. People admit that the terms are racist. Not say the term is racist, not believe the term is racist, admit the term is racist. Now admit has a specific connotation, when admit is being used, a crime or wrongdoing has occurred and it's only a matter of admitting guilt. Whether or not you admit it, you still did a crime. This made me skeptical of the study and want to dig deeper, and sure enough they're massaging the data. Specifically they've used an old trick that carefully words the questions in order to steer people into the answer they'd already pre-selected. The fact that they only wound up with 10% after loading the dice is really sad and pretty much proves the opposite of their point to anybody who knows to look at methodology for obvious bias.
The specific trick is that they don't let you select what terms you think are racist, you have to vote for all or none, and they roll the more inflammatory "Kung Flu" in and put it last so that it stands out more. I can readily see a lot of people thinking Kung Flu could be racist, I feel that way myself even though I don't about Wuhan Virus. I suspect if you remove the more loaded term and let people vote only for Wuhan Virus you will get a far lower number than the 10%, and given that the study is starting from a biased position anyway I don't trust their numbers too much in the first place.
As for Wuhan Virus itself, we have a very, very long history of using the place the outbreak began to identify it. Ebola Virus is named after the Ebola river where the disease first appeared. Bornholm's disease is named after Bornholm island where it first showed up. Lyme disease is named after the town of Lyme, CT. Spanish Flu of course, the big daddy of plagues. Somehow Ebola isn't racist against blacks, Lyme disease isn't racist against whites, Bornholm's disease isn't racist against Danes, and Spanish Flu isn't racist against Spaniards. Why is Wuhan Virus racist against Chinese when it follows the same naming convention?