They actually went through with it.
I feel a great sense of ambivalence.
I never had a dog in this fight, but after the left went after a whole bunch of my rights I don't really care about their whining about losing this right.
They actually went through with it.
They actually went through with it.
She is a centrist left.Okay, well... that's good.
She is a centrist left.
I am getting her to come around to our side
They also can't see the forest for the trees being so zealous in their horrendous practice. This will be shifted back to the states to decide as it isn't covered in the original constitution as was the argument even me a layman of your constitution understood that.I feel a great sense of ambivalence.
I never had a dog in this fight, but after the left went after a whole bunch of my rights I don't really care about their whining about losing this right.
If the "critical moral question" (of the fate of another human being) is what distinguishes abortion from the other issues decided on similar reasoning, what would preclude states from forbidding gay couples to adopt? Since raising a child, I'd imagine, is also important to the fate of a human being.Also, the opinion specifically stated nothing in this decision should be looked at as being related to, or relevant for, anything outside the issue of abortion.
VA is one of those states where governors can't serve consecutive terms, right? I'd ask if you thought it helped or hurt his reelection prospects but if I'm right then by the time he can run again (2028?) I expect the state legislature will have settled the question one way or the other already.Definitely glad to have him at the wheel in my home state right now.
I mean, nothing should theoretically get in the way, but then you start throwing in the facts of that Gays have a higher chance to molest and abuse children, then you see where the problem is. But that's rather off topic. We on that good Roe v Wade stuff rn.If the "critical moral question" (of the fate of another human being) is what distinguishes abortion from the other issues decided on similar reasoning, what would preclude states from forbidding gay couples to adopt? Since raising a child, I'd imagine, is also important to the fate of a human being.
I would say they're about to go nuclear and make EVERYONE have a bad week.Suffice to say the Dems are NOT having a good week, are they…???
Heck yeah boyo's. Time to dismantle this shitty industry and do what is nessessary. Not get rid of it entirely but ruin it to the point it's predatory practices are gone.
VA is one of those states where governors can't serve consecutive terms, right? I'd ask if you thought it helped or hurt his reelection prospects but if I'm right then by the time he can run again (2028?) I expect the state legislature will have settled the question one way or the other already.
Most people getting mad, or getting absolutely hysterical about how "they will come for gay marriage and inter racial marriage next" have no fucking idea what Roe v. Wade even was or why it was a contentious ruling.
The salt is imense. The tears flow freely. I look forwards to the fire bombing of churches by progressives.
Something to bear in mind.Also, the opinion specifically stated nothing in this decision should be looked at as being related to, or relevant for, anything outside the issue of abortion.
I feel a great sense of ambivalence.
I never had a dog in this fight, but after the left went after a whole bunch of my rights I don't really care about their whining about losing this right.
There was none in the original constitution period.Thats the wrong way to think about it, because they haven't actually lost any rights, there never was a "right to abortion".