See, I do. We are just going to have to agree to disagree here.
No, it wasn't killed. It was extracted, and they failed to save it's life.
See, it isn't a killing the way I put it. It's extracting and failing to save.
You are showing a fundamental disregard for human life.
The reason that the woman is in an ugly situation is because of a crime. That crime was rape, one of the three most heinous crimes a person can commit. If it wasn't doing nasty things to someone, putting them in a painful situation, it wouldn't be a crime.
The fact that a crime was committed against her, does not remove the baby's rights and value as a human being.
So now you have a sub-optimal situation, where there is
no good option, because someone committed rape. We have no ideal way out of this situation.
We now have two options in this situation:
1: The woman suffers through months of increasing discomfort and impairment, culminating in the painful process of giving birth.
2: Commit murder.
Clearly neither of these is good.
Equally clearly
one is objectively worse than the other in all ways.
When you are in a sub-optimal situation, you have a moral and
legal obligation to choose the least-bad outcome. And the least-bad outcome here is
not murder.
This is pretty basic moral reasoning. You don't need a degree in philosophy to understand these concepts.