No of course not. It would be edited for things of interest. Project Veritas edits its recordings, so a hypothetical PM discussion would be as well or else its "value and utility in accountability that comes with recording... bad actors." would be mitigated. I'm glad to know though that you've given permission for anyone who feels there are bad actors in the hypothetical PM Discussion that may still have access to it, could release those PM's as long as they edit it responsibly. And of course, for any ongoing PM discussions that are going on there... here... or discussions on Discord, Slack, or whatever else that may contain bad actors who may need dirty laundry exposed Project Veritas style.
Frankly if you actually have screenshots and copies from only the SB PM, that's amazing, considering I thought it was nuked and inaccessable to even SB staff.
And that is the only PM I have mentioned here, though you
@Husky_Khan seem to imply this is about any and all PM from anyone to anyone, which is not what I said.
Can you stop playing this stupid game and actually address the issue with the 'wage slave' comment. or are all you going to do is try to make this into a personal spat to deflect from how bad this all make DW look?
Who gives a shit? Jeremy Boreing wasn't asked about a phone call, why bother asking consent for anyone involved in this hypothetical PM Discussion.
Ah, because as I pointed out, text is much easier to fake than voice or video, as the whole situation around the SB PM proved as well, something you conveniently forget because decided to make this personal in a stupid and petty gotcha attempt.
And this was also about a business dealing as well; notice Crowder didn't put anything about family or the like in to it because that isn't stuff the public needs to see, as it has no bearing on the business deal at hand.
That is different from proposing dumping PM logs, which are text and thus much easier to fake than voice or video, of anyone and everyone as a gotcha attempt against one person.
Excuse me... I'm not the one making this about you and SB and this PM. I was merely floating the idea of a PM discussion on a forum being disclosed. I never said the SB PM Debacle. I was perfectly happy discussing a hypothetical without naming names. No one even brought up the SB PM Debacle until you outed yourself and gave permission to anyone to disclose it all because there might be some bad actors or dirty laundry in it.
I said 'likely PM clusterfuck' and you didn't deny it at all, because you think you are being oh so fucking clever and want to protect DW from Crowder any way you can by dodging the 'wage slave' comment.
He's literally saved no one. Everything you are discussing is a complete hypothetical as everyone that has come out so far, whether hired or not, has stated nothing predatory has occurred with Daily Wire contract negotiations. When DW hired Brett Cooper initially, they offered her a new contract when her YouTube Account exploded from seven thousand followers before she was hired within a year despite her being under the old contract she signed with them under when she was 19 years old.
Oh 'hypotheticals' bother you now.
You just want a gotcha against me and want to keep the discussion away from the 'wage slave' comment and it's implications for DW management and why Crowder felt it necessary to do this.
Because for some reasong attempting to score cheap gotcha's against me using this sort of shit, and deflecting from the discussion at hand with it, is something you really like doing.
Yeah imagine Steven Crowder being offended by someone else on a personal private phone call with him using the term "wage slave." I'm sure Crowder has never used controversial language in a phone call personal or other communication. He just saves it for the content behind his paywall lol. Your so offended by the 'wage slave' comment when Crowder says far more spicy things regularly in public. In Jeremy Boring's response video, he literally referred to himself as the God King, said he was always right when his talent disagreed with him and that they were chronically understaffed and perpetually overworked. But every nitwit is fine with casual hyperbolic speech until Crowder privately records one comment on a personal Holiday phone call.
I once resigned from a job because I wanted to paint 'wage slaver' on a corpo exec's car after I was coerced into off the clock labor by a skeleton crew deli at a semi-major chain. I know that coerced off-the-clock labor is not what Mr. Boring intended, however even jokingly referring to your employees that way says a lot about what sort of person is operating DW.
I am hardly the only person with experiences like this, and 'wage slave' is not a term thrown around in 'fun' conversations most of the time.
It seems like Crowder understands that an exec at a supposed right-wing leaning media group referring to his employees that way, and giving out boiler plates that look like shitty rap label contract that completely ignores any sort of simple background research on the subject, has horrible implications for the movement DW supposedly supports and represents.
You also completely ignored the whole 'Crowder was already demonetized, DW contract still had Youtube bits in it because lazy boilerplate'. DW is so arrogant and lazy it does not even bother to tailor new employment/partnership contracts to existing social media bans, bans that are not secret and not exactly recent either.
That you cannot see the issues with what DW's is doing/has done, and instead decided to turn this into another gotcha attempt against me, shows how weak DW's position really is, when the voice recording and the reactions are accounted for.
