worm that walks
Sexual Bolshevik
The problem with that is critical theory doesn't sound very much like whatever "cultural Marxism" is supposed to be. Critical theory is a reasonably influential philosophical school, that is consists largely of navel gazing by a bunch of German academics who can't agree on their basic premises. "Cultural Marxism" is some diabolical plot by all academics to destroy western civilization, for some unspecified reason.The problem is that the term Cultural Marxism is basically the right's way of referring to critical theory. A lot of the argument here is just people disagreeing what to call it.
And cultural marxism is an apt name for critical theory, if it didn't also have the historical context. The idea of critical theory, as envisioned by its creators, was to use the marxist way of looking at the world as oppressed and oppressors (which is how they do it. Economically, this becomes exploited and exploiters), and apply it to culture, and divorce it from economics (which I'd argue it can't be, but that's an academic debate not for here). The problem with critical theory, and the problem with Marxist economics in general, is that most relationships are mutually beneficial, without an oppressor and oppressed or exploiter and exploited.
Critical theory arguably doesn't even get applied to racial issues until the 1980s, so the idea that the originators of the term (we all know who they are, but there'll be whining if I say it) were referring to that is pretty much impossible.
Most people who are fine with gay people or divorce or whatever people are getting pissy about don't care about Hegelian responses to Marx. They just don't give a shit about other people's sex lives.