Tucker Carlson Leaving Fox News

Or they just... believe that laws should be applied equally, without bias, and to everyone applicable?
If a law is stupid, and the government shouldn't have the power to prevent an individual person from engaging in commerce(thats called a freemarket) then you should support things which would remove the law from the books or make it unenforced.

Didn't you like Bacle's post where he said he would leave the US and join Israel if it was being sanctioned? That sounds like it's one step below treason. You liking that post implies you feel the same. Abandoning your nation because of something you dislike and going to a foreign nation is a betrayal. FAR more than arguing against the policy and saying we should be friendly to a foreign nation.
 
Didn't you like Bacle's post where he said he would leave the US and join Israel if it was being sanctioned? That sounds like it's one step below treason. You liking that post implies you feel the same. Abandoning your nation because of something you dislike and going to a foreign nation is a betrayal. FAR more than arguing against the policy and saying we should be friendly to a foreign nation.

You mean your non-ironic hypothetical that President Rashida Tlaib was sanctioning Israel and threatening Journalist Bacle with ten millennium of imprisonment for visiting the place and giving a mouthpiece to the Jews?

I understand all hypotheticals that you conjure up are basically traps but this one is like exceptionally dumb if that's your hook.
 
Oh there is such a thing as fraud and even the biggest libertarians will have contracts when selling products require a minimum level of good faith.

But basically the way the current sanctions laws are done I feel is an overreach of government power(which is funny as many conservatives will laud the virtue of small government and pro federalism and anti unitary government yet ignore actual liberty interests) anyway I don't think an American should be penalized if they bought a cuban cigar.

But this is beyond that, the law does not prohibit Americans from travelling to Russia, the government should not be allowed to "shadow ban" certain actions. If you go to another country you need to buy food, water, transport, etc. that means you need to go to a money changer and switch your dollars to local currency.
Sanctions on the rubles are a "sneaky" way to get around the fact that the government hasn't banned travel to a country yet in effect they actually are. No government should not have the right to indirectly ban actions. It can directly ban something but not this shadow ban bullshit.
 
You mean your non-ironic hypothetical that President Rashida Tlaib was sanctioning Israel and threatening Journalist Bacle with ten millennium of imprisonment for visiting the place and giving a mouthpiece to the Jews?
Yes Husky in that hypothetical where we have a democratic socialist president and they sanction Israel. Would you support jailing journalists who go to Israel and have a interview with it's president, and later go to an Israeli store and buy stuff?
Should that person go to jail? I'm only asking for consistency and not being a hypocrite with a double standard.

Because if your answer to the hypotetical involving Israel is no the journo should not be arrested then you should have the same answer to Tucker. If it is yes at least you are consistent, though I think it's far too much power to the government.

The only people who would have different answers in this situation compared to the hypotetical are those who are disloyal to America and more loyal to a foreign regime.
 
Tucker had to get the rubles he used in the shopping trip from somewhere, and the ruble is a sanctioned currency.

It's not an abuse of power to hold Tucker liable for sanctions violations when he decides to go to a nation under heavy sanctions and engage with not only it's leader but it's local economy as well.

Carlson deciding to interview Putin was a bad idea to begin with, it pissed me off that he is so foolish to have done it at this point in time, and I won't pretend to clutch pearls over him being hit for sanctions violations from what he did on the his trip.
The mask slips
 
Yes Husky in that hypothetical where we have a democratic socialist president and they sanction Israel. Would you support jailing journalists who go to Israel and have a interview with it's president, and later go to an Israeli store and buy stuff?
Should that person go to jail? I'm only asking for consistency and not being a hypocrite with a double standard.

Because if your answer to the hypotetical involving Israel is no the journo should not be arrested then you should have the same answer to Tucker. If it is yes at least you are consistent, though I think it's far too much power to the government.

The only people who would have different answers in this situation compared to the hypotetical are those who are disloyal to America and more loyal to a foreign regime.

Yeah that's all great and all. I just didn't realize Palestinian Islamist Anti-Semitic Democratic Socialism Authoritarianism was in line with your perception of American values since apparently going contrary to that is comparable to the highest, greatest and most despicable form of traitor.

I find that more interesting to talk about then your fanfiction.
 
Yeah that's all great and all. I just didn't realize Palestinian Islamist Anti-Semitic Democratic Socialism Authoritarianism was in line with your perception of American values since apparently going contrary to that is comparable to the highest, greatest and most despicable form of traitor.

I find that more interesting to talk about than your fanfiction.
Are you gonna rage about commie Nazis next? You sound like a boomer muh democrat socialist authoritarian Islamist. Democratic socialists aren’t that extreme since we can see the popularity of Bernie Sanders among the young, also the many democratic socialists in Europe. You pretending it’s something fringe outside the Overton window is the same stupid conservative mistake of underestimating the opposition. It’s your actions that enable the left to win like this. Dont underestimate them. They have a chance of getting power you don’t want them to get too strong.
 
Are you gonna rage about commie Nazis next? You sound like a boomer muh democrat socialist authoritarian Islamist. Democratic socialists aren’t that extreme since we can see the popularity of Bernie Sanders among the young, also the many democratic socialists in Europe. You pretending it’s something fringe outside the Overton window is the same stupid conservative mistake of underestimating the opposition. It’s your actions that enable the left to win like this. Dont underestimate them. They have a chance of getting power you don’t want them to get too strong.

I'm not raging you retard. You are the one whinging hypotheticals about President Rashida Tlaib and stating betraying her ideals is the worst form of treason.

Anyways what do you care? You just excoriated Bacle and Vyor for being traitors of the highest order for betraying your word salad hypothetical government.

If this conversation sounds stupid (and it is) it's because your hypotheticals are stupid. Like more stupid (and gay) then asking to get your dick sucked off by a guy after jumping off a cliff. 🍆☠️
 
Each one of us could (or should be able to) conjure up hypothetical scenarios where Carlson being hit with legal consequences would be justified or unjustified in accordance with what he hypothetically did or didn't do. It's not unimaginable that conducting a slapfight between two competing hypothetical scenarios would be productive and/or entertaining, but so far you guys haven't been landing it.
 
Each one of us could (or should be able to) conjure up hypothetical scenarios where Carlson being hit with legal consequences would be justified or unjustified in accordance with what he hypothetically did or didn't do. It's not unimaginable that conducting a slapfight between two competing hypothetical scenarios would be productive and/or entertaining, but so far you guys haven't been landing it.

The fact the main issue is whether Tucker Carlson should be arrested for a mild illegal act like smuggling bread from Russia seems pretty prosaic. I was actually assuming they'd be arguing even if they both basically agreed on the law which would've been more hilarious.

But alas we can only console ourselves that this diversion was caused by people making really overt jokes about Tucker Carlson getting ten millenia worth of incarceration for bread smuggling.

Apparently jokes are illegal on both sides now.
 
I'm not raging you retard. You are the one whinging hypotheticals about President Rashida Tlaib and stating betraying her ideals is the worst form of treason.

Anyways what do you care? You just excoriated Bacle and Vyor for being traitors of the highest order for betraying your word salad hypothetical government.

If this conversation sounds stupid (and it is) it's because your hypotheticals are stupid. Like more stupid (and gay) then asking to get your dick sucked off by a guy after jumping off a cliff. 🍆☠️
You inbred Buffon. It’s not Rashida Talibs views you are betraying in the hypothetical. It’s the nations. Here is the thing even if the president is a piece of shit you don’t like. They are still the president and they steer the nation and its government. You don’t get to rebel or join up with enemy nations if you don’t like the president. It does not work like that. If the legitimate president you don’t like goes against a foreign country you do like. Supporting that country against your own country is treason. Many people did not like Bush’s war in Iraq, or Clinton in Yugoslavia. You still don’t get to fucking jump ship and be a turn coat.

Also learn to read mutt I never told anyone to suck my dick. I told them to suck A dick.
 
You inbred Buffon.

Actually Huskies have one of the lowest levels of inbeeeding. Far less then most Eastern Orthodog breeds (and their Masters) which are highly inbred.

*snips word salad* Also learn to read mutt I never told anyone to suck my dick. I told them to suck A dick.

Learn to write Racist. When making your last request before cliff diving, you should be specific because you might not be around to clarify. Like if I had a last request as a Good Christian lad, wanting someone else to find homoerotic companionship wouldn't even break in the Top Five... Or even my Top Ten requests.

And which, btw is still gay and which is why I said your hypothetical was more gay then your request for dick sucking.

Bad news for you, Husky!

TEN MILLION YEARS IN GULAG FOR YOU, SHITPOSTER

Ha jokes on you! According to this calculator that's merely 288 years and eleven months in Human Years. :cool:

I'll be out and fluffing it up many millenia before those criminals like Tucker Carlson or Bacle are released.

I'm not sure how that Math works but I agree with the experts.
 
Actually Huskies have one of the lowest levels of inbeeeding. Far less then most Eastern Orthodog breeds (and their Masters) which are highly inbred.
Actually English dogs seem to be the most inbred along with the Norse Lundehound
Learn to write Racist. When making your last request before cliff diving, you should be specific because you might not be around to clarify. Like if I had a last request as a Good Christian lad, wanting someone else to find homoerotic companionship wouldn't even break in the Top Five... Or even my Top Ten requests.

And which, btw is still gay and which is why I said your hypothetical was more gay then your request for dick sucking.
So you aren’t going to engage with the whole you can’t betray the nation because the leader is a dick thing?
 
But this is beyond that, the law does not prohibit Americans from travelling to Russia, the government should not be allowed to "shadow ban" certain actions. If you go to another country you need to buy food, water, transport, etc. that means you need to go to a money changer and switch your dollars to local currency.
Sanctions on the rubles are a "sneaky" way to get around the fact that the government hasn't banned travel to a country yet in effect they actually are. No government should not have the right to indirectly ban actions. It can directly ban something but not this shadow ban bullshit.
I'm pretty damn sure that if he gets charged with something, it won't be for going to first random money exchange and buying some rubles like any ordinary person would (which seems to be the random ass guess based strawman you are clobbering so hard).
But what we know little of, the man had business dealings with Russian state owned entities in the past, and we have no idea how this interview was set up legally, but more likely than not there was some sort of contract, and that might be something going against the sanctions.
And if he doesn't get charged, in that case it's just yet another case of journos making a bullshit story.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top