China Wuhan Virus Pandemic

Is their a Qing survivor/decendent we could restore to the Forbidden City?
Fuck those Manchus.

As a maternal descendant of the Ming Dynasty, I hereby proclaim myself Emperor of China, Ruler of all Under Heaven!

The scary part here is if the warlords gain nuke control and start using them on their counterparts.
Which will make the post-Endor Galactic Empire wars look humane.

3. German parliament voted against compulsory vaccine rules a few days ago.
Germany are two steps away from turning back into Das Reich.


It only took about 6 hours for airlines to drop the policy after this ruling.
Like rats off a sinking ship.
 
Fuck those Manchus.

As a maternal descendant of the Ming Dynasty, I hereby proclaim myself Emperor of China, Ruler of all Under Heaven!


Which will make the post-Endor Galactic Empire wars look humane.


Germany are two steps away from turning back into Das Reich.


Like rats off a sinking ship.


Ok, um lets face facts the ming were fucking glorious seriously dispite all of the problems people kept trying to revive them for centuries for a reason.
 
Ok, um lets face facts the ming were fucking glorious seriously dispite all of the problems people kept trying to revive them for centuries for a reason.
There are worse things that could happen to China and the world than a Ming Restoration.
 
Bit of a minor story that should be interesting to those who value their brains.



Woman alleges injury via pcr test lodging too far.

Referring back to my earlier post:

“PCR amplification is an epic technology and can detect the slightest speck of RNA”-Curtis Yarvin.

Is that why it gives false positives on fruits and potatoes of all things, sir? And why, going off case records, the flu all but vanished in 2020? So “epic” that it’s very use can cause brain injuries if a nurse flinches the wrong way, hmmm.
That this injury is even a remote possibility, especially when the need for daily tests in some areas is kept in mind, is somewhat concerning.
 
You know what really pisses me off the most about all of this? The "citation needed" crowd and their reactions to people like me citing actual studies to make a case that the vaccine was harmful.

It really goes to show that when people say "citation needed", they don't give a rat's ass about evidence. Any evidence you provide in the way of primary journal sources, they will dismiss out of hand, or they'll argue that you lack the technical knowledge to interpret the evidence either way.

Scientism is absolutely ridiculous. It's literally idol-worship. Like a cargo cult. They don't understand the science, and they don't want to understand it. To understand it would be to trespass upon its sanctity, to tread upon holy ground, to violate a taboo.

Well, soon, it'll all be over. The evidence will be too much for people to ignore.

The mRNA SARS-CoV-2 vaccines were brought to market in response to the public health crises of Covid-19. The utilization of mRNA vaccines in the context of infectious disease has no precedent. The many alterations in the vaccine mRNA hide the mRNA from cellular defenses and promote a longer biological half-life and high production of spike protein. However, the immune response to the vaccine is very different from that to a SARS-CoV-2 infection. In this paper, we present evidence that vaccination induces a profound impairment in type I interferon signaling, which has diverse adverse consequences to human health. Immune cells that have taken up the vaccine nanoparticles release into circulation large numbers of exosomes containing spike protein along with critical microRNAs that induce a signaling response in recipient cells at distant sites. We also identify potential profound disturbances in regulatory control of protein synthesis and cancer surveillance. These disturbances potentially have a causal link to neurodegenerative disease, myocarditis, immune thrombocytopenia, Bell's palsy, liver disease, impaired adaptive immunity, impaired DNA damage response and tumorigenesis. We show evidence from the VAERS database supporting our hypothesis. We believe a comprehensive risk/benefit assessment of the mRNA vaccines questions them as positive contributors to public health.

This "vaccine" is poison. The governments pushing it on people are engaged in democide. That is, the deliberate murder of their own citizens.
 
You know what really pisses me off the most about all of this? The "citation needed" crowd and their reactions to people like me citing actual studies to make a case that the vaccine was harmful.

It really goes to show that when people say "citation needed", they don't give a rat's ass about evidence. Any evidence you provide in the way of primary journal sources, they will dismiss out of hand, or they'll argue that you lack the technical knowledge to interpret the evidence either way.

Scientism is absolutely ridiculous. It's literally idol-worship. Like a cargo cult. They don't understand the science, and they don't want to understand it. To understand it would be to trespass upon its sanctity, to tread upon holy ground, to violate a taboo.

Well, soon, it'll all be over. The evidence will be too much for people to ignore.
The ultimate irony about scientism is that the 'Reddit Atheists' who suddenly started to spout crap like "trust the science" are behaving like the religious fanatics that they criticize, in that scientism is basically a kind of religion that even atheists would not mind adopting. Of course, when you can say that you can question science, they get pissed and say "you can't question it!" and when the science does eventually change, they'd just say "the science changes!" Typical fanatics in favor of Big Pharma-backed 'science'.

Another thing is that Big Pharma has a vested interest in not giving out a full detailed explanation on what the mRNA vaccine will actually do to the body to the normies without sounding like those so-called anti-vaxxers that call out Big Pharma on this kind of crap.
 
The ultimate irony about scientism is that the 'Reddit Atheists' who suddenly started to spout crap like "trust the science" are behaving like the religious fanatics that they criticize, in that scientism is basically a kind of religion that even atheists would not mind adopting. Of course, when you can say that you can question science, they get pissed and say "you can't question it!" and when the science does eventually change, they'd just say "the science changes!" Typical fanatics in favor of Big Pharma-backed 'science'.

Another thing is that Big Pharma has a vested interest in not giving out a full detailed explanation on what the mRNA vaccine will actually do to the body to the normies without sounding like those so-called anti-vaxxers that call out Big Pharma on this kind of crap.


Science is made for a very specific purpose it is not designed to be a religion nor should it be.
 
The ultimate irony about scientism is that the 'Reddit Atheists' who suddenly started to spout crap like "trust the science" are behaving like the religious fanatics that they criticize, in that scientism is basically a kind of religion that even atheists would not mind adopting. Of course, when you can say that you can question science, they get pissed and say "you can't question it!" and when the science does eventually change, they'd just say "the science changes!" Typical fanatics in favor of Big Pharma-backed 'science'.

As if they were members of some cult where the leaders claim to be infallible, but also keep changing their teaching. And the followers all just forget the old doctrine the moment they hear the new one.

That being said, I wonder how sincerely the "Reddit Atheist" types really believe anything they say.
 



Randomized controlled trials show all-cause mortality reduction from the Covid adenovirus-vector vaccines (RR=0.37, 95%CI: 0.19-0.70) but not from the mRNA vaccines (RR=1.03, 95%CI 0.63-1.71).
That is the verdict from a new Danish study by Dr. Christine Benn and colleagues. Have people been given vaccines that don’t work (Pfizer/Moderna) instead of vaccines that do work (AstraZeneca/Johnson & Johnson)? Let’s put this study into context and then delve into the numbers.
In medicine, the gold standard for evidence is randomized controlled trials (RCT), as they avoid study bias for or against the vaccine. Moreover, the key outcome is death. Do these vaccines save lives? Hence, the Danish study answers the right question with the right data.
It is the first study to do so.
When the Pfizer and Moderna mRNA vaccines were approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA), that decision was based on RCTs. The RCTs submitted to the FDA showed that the vaccines reduce symptomatic Covid infections. By recruiting mostly younger and middle-aged adults, who are unlikely to die from Covid no matter what, the studies were not designed to determine whether the vaccines also reduce mortality.
That was assumed as a corollary, although it may or may not be true. Neither were the RCTs designed to determine whether the vaccines reduce transmission, but that is a different story for another time.

There is clear evidence that the adenovirus-vector vaccines reduced mortality. For every 100 deaths in the unvaccinated, there are only 37 deaths among the vaccinated, with a 95% confidence interval of 19 to 70 deaths. This result comes from five different RCTs for three different vaccines, but it is primarily driven by the AstraZeneca and Johnson & Johnson vaccines.
For the mRNA vaccines, on the other hand, there was no evidence of a mortality reduction. For every 100 deaths among the unvaccinated, there are 103 deaths among the vaccinated, with a 95% confidence interval of 63 to 171 deaths. That is, the mRNA vaccines may reduce mortality a little bit, or they may increase it; we do not know. The Pfizer and Moderna vaccines contributed equally to this result, so there is no evidence that one is better or worse than the other.
While all-cause mortality is what matters for public health, there is scientific interest in knowing how the different vaccines affect different types of mortality. The Danish scientists contacted RCT investigators to get information on whether each death was due to Covid, cardiovascular disease, accidents, or other causes.
For the mRNA vaccines, there was a reduction in Covid deaths but an increase in cardiovascular deaths, but neither was statistically significant. So, either result could be due to random chance. Alternatively, the vaccines may reduce the risk for Covid deaths while increasing the risk for cardiovascular deaths. We do not know, and Pfizer and Moderna did not design the RCTs to let us know.
 
What do you base those numbers on?




Seems like we're in the part which determines who gets there at all.

The liberals are not having children and aborting the ones they are having, and are in a self destructive spiral.

40-60 years is about how long it will take before their insitutional control, money and influence simply will not be enough to stop change. That's the point where the public now increasingly sick of failed social experiements stop giving a shit and simply want it to end.

A lot of us wont make it. I'm pretty sure I will be murdered in some dark ally with in the next 20 years. Some of us the younger zoomer crowd might live long enough to see all of this end. Its going to be a shit show, but the long term future is bright. Just not for us, our grandchildren yes but not us.
 
I've had three and I'm not dead yet.

A good omen.
Bruh, get yourself private tests and scans every year or so: I'm not being hyperbolic when I say that you could develop a medical issue and, you know, die from the "vaccine" and its boosters.
The liberals are not having children and aborting the ones they are having, and are in a self destructive spiral.
[...]
Why have children when they can indoctrinate ours through the media, education system, and poisoned culture?

"We're coming for your children", and all.
 
What do you base those numbers on?




Seems like we're in the part which determines who gets there at all.
He pulls them out of his ass. Don't worry in 89 years everything will be okay.

The liberals are not having children and aborting the ones they are having, and are in a self destructive spiral.

40-60 years is about how long it will take before their insitutional control, money and influence simply will not be enough to stop change. That's the point where the public now increasingly sick of failed social experiements stop giving a shit and simply want it to end.

A lot of us wont make it. I'm pretty sure I will be murdered in some dark ally with in the next 20 years. Some of us the younger zoomer crowd might live long enough to see all of this end. Its going to be a shit show, but the long term future is bright. Just not for us, our grandchildren yes but not us.
they don't need to have children, they'll import more from Mexico, and indoctrinate yours.
 
He pulls them out of his ass. Don't worry in 89 years everything will be okay.

they don't need to have children, they'll import more from Mexico, and indoctrinate yours.

Mexico's birth rate is lowering, and their having the exact same phenominon as us its a global thing and their power to indoctrinate people will get weaker with time. The more divorced propaganda is from reality the less effective it becomes over time.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top