Like miss muffit the curds go in his whey.
United States Biden administration policies and actions - megathread
- Thread starter Tyzuris
- Start date
9/11 might not have been an inside job, but what you claim is the reason we invaded Iraq is not even close to the excuse used by Bush and co.
This is part of why the public has been increasingly distrustful of civie and military leaders; we know they will lie to and misrepresent things to the American public in order to justify armed conflict. Which is something the US military has done multiple times, including lying about why the Maine exploded to justify war with Spain.
Welcome to history of military bacle.
Of you thought war was all truth then you sre naive
I was naive once, a long time ago.
Now I am just not interested in pretending the US gov and military are righteous or actually servants of the Constitution, instead of the petty and greedy assholes in DC who often see war as a profit making opportunity and who will lie to the American people to get what they want.
You are still Naive.
WAR has always been like since since the dawn of time. The people up high will always know more then the civilian complaining on the internet. Or in the town square back in the day.
But it is no use arguing with you. You will just plug your ears and say "lalalalalalala you don't know anything I know what yall are hiding! Lalalalalalala"
And here you go with the in usual absurd and hyperbolic overexaggeration of what I said.
Thanks Col. Flagg.
49ersfootball
Well-known member
I put that jerk on the ignore list. There needs to be a block button.
Speaking of pictures: I've got lots of pictures on my flash-drive, but cannot find the second option in the picture link on Sietch.
Where were those bio/chem weapons stockpiles that Saddam had?
They found nothing.
The stockpiles were gone (i sus that Saddam sold them to Syria or something like that). Regardless Saddam no longer had them by 2003, if he ever did.
Because he would have deployed them against Coalition forces when he started losing.
Iraq was already beaten after the Gulf War.
Destabilizing the region by violently removing Saddam from power served no one except the military industrial complex which profited billions at the expense of taxpayer dollars and soldiers lives.
You really have no place to talk considering your cognitive dissonance when it comes to the intelligence community and law enforcement.
You need to purchase a membership at a level that is at least equal to the one I have.
49ersfootball
Well-known member
How do I do that to purchase membership ?
Arch Dornan
Oh, lovely. They've sent me a mo-ron.
He said it.
Carrot of Truth
War is Peace
Why would Senator Joe Manchin do this and raise insulin prices on those poor people after Biden clearly lowered the price of it for them?
Yeah, this bit is pure hypocrisy that relies on memory holing what all happened with the price of insulin under Trump and why it came back up.
Why would Senator Joe Manchin do this and raise insulin prices on those poor people after Biden clearly lowered the price of it for them?
Terthna
Professional Lurker
You ever tried to argue with a child who's only response is to keep going "uh-uh!"? That's pretty much what political discourse has devolved into.
strunkenwhite
Well-known member
I don't see it happening. If she won the nomination she'd be the first former nominee (who failed to win the election) since ... well, in 2024 probably since Trump, but before that it would be Nixon right? It's fine to paint her as an avatar of everything wrong with the establishment, but the establishment doesn't tend to give people another at-bat after getting to the top of the ticket and then losing.
Posobiec's intel could be Harris pumping Clinton for info on how to prosecute a presidential campaign, which seems quite silly given that Biden is right fuckin' there, Obama is next door, and the other Clinton actually won, but whatever.
Actually, it seems they may be looking at Hillary for VP, and Harris as POTUS.
Kamala is pretty unlikable even on the Left, so they want to bolster her chances with Clinton nostalgia/donors/influence.
strunkenwhite
Well-known member
I see. It's more plausible, but it involves Clinton coming out of retirement just to play second fiddle. And she's not exactly a spring chicken. And it seems like an odd play to alleviate Harris's unlikability by pairing her with what I think even Democrats agree is the least likable candidate they've fielded in decades. If Clinton simply wants to boost the ticket it's probably best done from the sidelines; does it really matter where she's standing when she pulls the strings? If she's doing it for the power and prestige of second place, that I have a harder time buying.