If there is a no knock raid at the wrong house, having tax payers and/or insurance companies pay to fix the victim’s house is woefully insufficient.In practice that would just let the State double dip on fucking people it doesn't like. Judges already defacto side with police, letting them then dismiss cases they don't like and stick them with the bill?
You keep thinking that the courts in general and judges in particular are neutral. This is not the case, they side with the police in almost all circumstances. QI is asmuch an acknowledgement of expected outcome as it is a law.
Thus letting the courts punish claimants as a way of deterring claims is likely just going lead to QI with extra teeth.
I think the insurance idea is more workable. Allows for restitution without admitting fault or culpability. Your house get burnt down because of flashbacks in a noknock raid with the wrong number? Insurance pays out and the PD handle the clown internally for making their premiums go up.
Right now it leads to nothing. Perfect is the enemy of good. Get a system in place to compensate people for obvious fuckups. Then start throwing blame around.If there is a no knock raid at the wrong house, having tax payers and/or insurance companies pay to fix the victim’s house is woefully insufficient.
No knock raids at the wrong house need to lead to serious jail time in every case. Serious jail time for the people conducting the raid, not for the home owners.
It's usually the ones who have things to hide/cover for that do.As a wife, mother, and sister of police officers I don't have a problem with this. Neither do they.
We bought our daughter and my little brother body cams before it was all the rage. My husband offered to install a camera in his office. Although all you would see is him doing paperwork most of the day...It's usually the ones who have things to hide/cover for that do.
UK is utterly lost. Full on Police state.
Yup.you know if the officer in question had just let this go hardly any one would have known, now the entire world is going to look at this and say that the autistic girl was most likely right.
Tomboys are forbidden and haram in the G.A.E! You’ll take your feminine penis and like it, or else!I miss tomboys.
That's why people love the new Lois Lane from the new Superman cartoon: She's an actual tomboy, not a Groomers United weirdo.I miss tomboys.
I care; and personally, I don't think the show is any good even when you ignore the raceswaps.That's why people love the new Lois Lane from the new Superman cartoon: She's an actual tomboy, not a Groomers United weirdo.
The Leftoids can't even pull the "racism card" for ammunition because, although this Lois is Korean-American, no-one gives an utter shit that she's been race-swapped. They (and I) just love the character.
Same deal with Jimmy -- He's now Black from being a White ginger dude (though, you could argue that's another "redheads being erased in media/Hollywood" thing), but he's fucking hilarious. He's also BFF's with Clark since college (and was the first to put together that he's Superman, but he didn't care/was respectful).
Great characters.
Well, everyone has their own tastes. shrugI care; and personally, I don't think the show is any good even when you ignore the raceswaps.