China Wuhan Virus Pandemic

Iconoclast

Perpetually Angry
Obozny

I know.

The only reason why McCullough even did this presentation was because someone (you know who) wrote an article on it blowing it wide open, back in 2022, which is also about how old that clip actually is. Not “breaking” news by any means.
  • The ongoing outsourced GOF research on viruses has been done through thinly veiled CIA/DOD biodefense programs like:
    • NIH, In-Q-Tel, USAID and UC Davis's EPT-PREDICT
    • DTRA's CBEP/BTRP
    • DARPA's PREEMPT (for which EcoHealth's DEFUSE was proposed.)
  • The orgs involved in this work are CIA/USAID-connected middlemen like Peter Daszak's EcoHealth Alliance, Nathan Wolfe's Metabiota, and Karen Saylors' Labyrinth Global Health, who take HHS, CIA, and DOD grant money and subcontract it to overseas labs to conduct shady virus experiments outside the reach of US FOIA requests and other transparency and accountability laws.
    • This business of outsourcing GOF research technically began after watchdog orgs like Edward Hammond's Sunshine Project started making FOIA requests in the 2000s to determine what university labs were doing with viruses and why we were building so many BSL-3/BSL-4 high-containment labs in the US. In short, the outsourcing was in contempt of disclosure.
  • Peter Daszak, Nathan Wolfe, and Karen Saylors all know each other, and all of their orgs are CIA fronts.
  • Nathan Wolfe, in particular, has close connections to Ghislaine Maxwell, Boris Nikolic, Bill Gates, etc., and his company, Metabiota, was funded by Hunter Biden, Devon Archer, and Christopher Heinz's Rosemont Seneca.
  • DARPA has given Moderna millions of dollars under the ADEPT: PROTECT program to come up with mRNA monoclonal antibody therapies for Chikungunya, like mRNA-1944.
  • Moderna and Pfizer don't actually manufacture their own vaccines. They just rubber-stamp them. The actual ingredients are made by CIA-linked defense contractors like National Resilience.
  • Anthony Fauci perjured himself in front of Congress when he stated that the NIH did not fund GOF research at the WIV. They most certainly did.
  • Also, Moderna and NIH co-own the patents to mRNA-1273, their COVID-19 vaccine.
  • The US DOD acquired the vaccines under OTAs as "prototypes to demonstrate mass production", which meant they weren't legally pharmaceuticals. When Brook Jackson, the Ventavia whistleblower, confronted Pfizer in court over this, Pfizer's legal defense was that they "only committed fraud that the government ordered them to".
There is a reason for the coverup. If SARS-CoV-2 indeed came from the WIV, then one could make a sensible argument that the same funding streams that produced the virus also produced the vaccine. This is fraud and mass murder on a frankly unbelievable scale.

Political Moonshine's COVID-19 Enterprise Fraud timeline is very comprehensive:


Also, here's a recent court testimony by Dr. Aseem Malhotra:



Nothing that happened in the past several years was an accident. COVID-19 was the product of monstrous criminality on a global scale. The people responsible need to be held accountable for it.
 

DarthOne

☦️
Rand Paul: A Brave Marine Lt. Colonel Stepped Forward and Revealed that 15 US Agencies Knew COVID-19 Was Created in Lab in 2018 – But They Kept It Secret from American Public (VIDEO)

Dr. Tony Fauci called Dr. Kristian Anderson and ordered him to publicly say the COVID virus was NOT lab-made.

The New York Times reported on Anderson's early email to Dr. Fauci in an article published in June 2021.

Over the past year, Dr. Andersen has been one of the most outspoken proponents of the theory that the coronavirus originated from a natural spillover from an animal to humans outside of a lab. But in the email to Dr. Fauci in January 2020, Dr. Andersen hadn't yet come to that conclusion. He told Dr. Fauci, the government's top infectious disease expert, that some features of the virus made him wonder whether it had been engineered, and noted that he and his colleagues were planning to investigate further by analyzing the virus's genome.
The researchers published those results in a paper in the scientific journal Nature Medicine on March 17, 2020, concluding that a laboratory origin was very unlikely. Dr. Andersen has reiterated this point of view in interviews and on Twitter over the past year, putting him at the center of the continuing controversy over whether the virus could have leaked from a Chinese lab.
When his early email to Dr. Fauci was released, the media storm around Dr. Andersen intensified, and he deactivated his Twitter account. He answered written questions from The New York Times about the email and the fracas. The exchange has been lightly edited for length.

Dr. Anderson switched his story in 4 days after his call with Tony Fauci.

But, The New York Times conveniently omitted that after his call with Dr. Fauci on February 1, 2020, Dr. Anderson was given a $1.88 million grant and $16.5 million in funding from NIAID, Dr. Fauci's personal piggy bank.

Dr. Andrew Huff testified to this fact back in 2022. He released this information in a legal report he signed created by the Renz Law Group.

Dr. Andrew Huff reported that Dr. Anderson's funding at the Scripps Research Institute increased from $393,079 per month, to $800,139 per month after he backed down on the COVID lab-leak theory.
(page 56)

Scientists later discovered the first victims of the COVID 19 pandemic were researchers from the Fauci-funded Wuhan lab.

And it was also discovered that a Fauci-run Montana laboratory conducted experiments with the Wuhan Coronavirus strain over a year before the global outbreak.

Now we learn from Senator Rand Paul that 15 different federal agencies knew in 2018 that the Wuhan laboratory was trying to create a coronavirus strain like COVID-19. Not one person had the guts to step forward and tell the truth to the American public.

And we all know it is likely that they will never be indicted or punished.
 

The Whispering Monk

Well-known member
Osaul
Frankly, this is the purpose of Guantanamo. Fauci et al get sent there and sweated for info.

"Oh? You had someone in govt. tell you to do this? Where are the written orders?"

No lawyers, no representation.
Repeat procedure for as high as you can go.
Patriot allows this b/c biological attacks are an act of Terror.
They wrote the law we can hang them with.
 

Scottty

Well-known member
Founder
Frankly, this is the purpose of Guantanamo. Fauci et al get sent there and sweated for info.

"Oh? You had someone in govt. tell you to do this? Where are the written orders?"

No lawyers, no representation.
Repeat procedure for as high as you can go.
Patriot allows this b/c biological attacks are an act of Terror.
They wrote the law we can hang them with.

Because they never expected it would be used against themselves.
 

prinCZess

Warrior, Writer, Performer, Perv
because putting your bioweapons research on the territory of your biggest competitor is a galaxy brain move...

I u give them your superweapons labs, u win...

Lol, Sun Tzu level logic right there.
In fairness, few would accuse American academics of the last...decades...of being too tough on communism/'China', or interested in promoting American foreign policy dominance.
 

Agent23

Ни шагу назад!
In fairness, few would accuse American academics of the last...decades...of being too tough on communism/'China', or interested in promoting American foreign policy dominance.
The guy was being bankrolled by the DoD/Pentagon.

This makes Woemold from Our Guy in Havana look highly principled and competent by comparison.
 

S'task

Renegade Philosopher
Administrator
Staff Member
Founder
Bear in mind that from the 1990s onwards until the early 2020s the Establishment didn't consider China a geopolitical rival but rather a rising ally that was expected to eclipse the US as the main world leading country / economy. Obama even explicitly made it one of his foreign policy goals to "manage American decline" as China rose. This was why so much of the Establishment got invested in China, they sought to curry favor with who they thought was going to be the next great power and sought to be seen as aiding it's rise rather than opposing it so they would be on China's good side seeing how China had a major chip on it shoulder concerning the Century of Humiliation.

It was only populists and Social / Religious Conservatives / Old Cold Warriors who held that China was a rival, and they were frozen out of the Foreign Policy discussion almost entirely.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Top