D
Deleted member 88
Guest
I suppose a better thread would be ideology and theory-right wing praxis.
You know what, I'll make the thread.
You know what, I'll make the thread.
Personally, I think our not on topic argument has a good effect. The trolls are gone for now anyway.
I suppose a better thread would be ideology and theory-right wing praxis.
You know what, I'll make the thread.
Never interrupt your opponent when he's making a mistake.Personally, I think our not on topic argument has a good effect. The trolls are gone for now anyway.
Never interrupt your opponent when he's making a mistake.
Lol, its a fairly meaningless argument you guys were having. Nobody is convincing anybody.Never interrupt your opponent when he's making a mistake.
That sort of raises the question of whether any leftist could have any credibility with you.So we should just ignore you, and let you act like idiots and utterly ruin your credibility got it.
An avowed socialist like you never could get credibility here.That sort of raises the question of whether any leftist could have any credibility with you.
That sort of raises the question of whether any leftist could have any credibility with you.
Well, we're both Americans, are we not? Surely we have some common goals.An avowed socialist like you never could get credibility here.
You've even admitted you want your side to harness identity politics as a means to getting your socialist revolution.
You are our enemy, and we will not forget it.
There is nothing to be discussed. Leftists and Liberals have made it clear, there can only be a winner and a loser.That sort of raises the question of whether any leftist could have any credibility with you.
There is nothing to be discussed. Leftists and Liberals have made it clear, there can only be a winner and a loser.
'Enemies foreign and domestic' ring a bell?Well, we're both Americans, are we not? Surely we have some common goals.
There are some decent people on the Left.I am not sure. I think there are people distinctly on the left who are decent members of the community.
And the Left have berated Trump when he made the very same comment you made I believe?I am not sure. I think there are people distinctly on the left who are decent members of the community.
Indeed, which I've tried to do. But our disagreements about the election seem to be an extremely harsh matter.Of course you can have credibility, come here and discuss with us in good faith. Be a good member of the community and so on.
You know normal people things.
He tries really, really hard to come across as a reasonable person in a debate; but that's always been merely a tactic, not who he actually is as a person. He's not a centrist; he just thinks portraying himself as one will convince you to take his arguments more seriously.Anchovy’s not really a centralist though is he? Having a mix of conservative and liberal views is different from being in the middle.
And you never will because, accusations of you holding the position you do to try and protect your job aside, you've previously laid out how you think sticking to your guns in spite of evidence to the contrary is a virtue. Trying to argue with you about anything is a complete waste of time.No, I don’t see any evidence for that.
The weird thing is that I've seen leftists say the exact same thing about Anchovy in the opposite direction. The real truth of the matter is that he's both centrist and contrarian.He tries really, really hard to come across as a reasonable person in a debate; but that's always been merely a tactic, not who he actually is as a person. He's not actually a centrist; he just thinks portraying himself as one will convince you to take his arguments more seriously.
To many leftists everything to the right of Mao is nazism, so their opinion on someone's place on a political spectrum is just about worthless.The weird thing is that I've seen leftists say the exact same thing about Anchovy in the opposite direction.
He tries really, really hard to come across as a reasonable person in a debate; but that's always been merely a tactic, not who he actually is as a person. He's not a centrist; he just thinks portraying himself as one will convince you to take his arguments more seriously.
And you never will because, accusations of you holding the position you do to try and protect your job aside, you've previously laid out how you think sticking to your guns in spite of evidence to the contrary is a virtue. Trying to argue with you about anything is a complete waste of time.