Duke Nukem
Hail to the king baby
Do it!
Do it!
They will latch onto anythingYou are fucking pathetic if you think we will buy this bullshit you are peddling.
Trump has been after Section 230 for a long time because of how Big Tech have treated Conservatives and censored things to fit certain political narratives.
The "arguments" these people come up with get dumber everyday.You are fucking pathetic if you think we will buy this bullshit you are peddling.
Trump has been after Section 230 for a long time because of how Big Tech have treated Conservatives and censored things to fit certain political narratives.
The fact they actually believe that shit, or believe it enough to post it here for trolling purposes, shows how petty many anti-Trump people are.They will latch onto anything
I agree, Trump needs to do it, so he can gain the highground...otherwise Biden will have it and use it to throw senate chairs at him.
Dominion systems released a statement on Sidney Powell's lawsuit.
Statement From Dominion on Sidney Powell's Charges - Dominion Voting Systems
Latest News November 26, 2020 Statement from Dominion on Sidney Powell’s Charges While Dominion Voting Systems is not named as a defendant, on Wednesday, November 25, 2020, Sidney Powell released what appears to be a very rough draft of a lawsuit against the Republican governor and secretary of...www.dominionvoting.com
They're are lying their ass off.
They better be ready to have evidence of this shit.
They better be ready to have evidence of this shit.
And do you have access to the same systems she does?Five will get you ten that they do. That there is a configuration of their software and hardware that both matches what they sold them and will perform as stated is a minimum. If it wasn't used in recommended fashion, that isn't the companies fault.
Beyond that, none of my research has been able to cooberate the sort of connections that the brief supposes. Nor does any of the included information provide the links to do like wise. Along with that, none of the lawyers I've been able to find have found documentation of the witnesses who were redacted being placed under veil. It also apparently lacks the sort of references that thing would require.
Add to that, that at least one of the plaintiffs didn't authorize her to sue on her behalf, and that's just the tip of what is becoming increasingly clear was less a grand legal condemnation of the Voter Fraud conspiracy and more something that people obviously slapped together at the last minute. The Law is an adversarial matter and a very technical one, and leaving the sort of thing around for her opponents is going to let them gut her at the beginning, assuming the Judge doesn't become offended by the typos and run together sentences, and other more technical flaws.
And do you have access to the same systems she does?
Because I can tell you from personal experience when you are in a job, or have investigators doing the job as well, they often have more things they can use then someone woth Google. For instance I have access to more things then damn near everyone here. I can check for things that no one else can for the most part.
The thing is I can't share it.
Have you used her sources? Have you looked at what she provided? Because that is where you would go to dorsprove her. Disprove her sources.