Arch Dornan
Oh, lovely. They've sent me a mo-ron.
When it's easier to take it to enforce a goal at the hands of the paper and word for a cushy life. Screw the plebs.Yes, but when? When did money power triumph?
When it's easier to take it to enforce a goal at the hands of the paper and word for a cushy life. Screw the plebs.Yes, but when? When did money power triumph?
What could he have done?
Election rules and such are different from State to State, and there is little the Exec branch can do to change those rules from on high. Trump cannot control states deciding to stop counting at weird times, he cannot control USPS mail carriers deciding to fuck with ballots, he cannot control Never-Trumpers assisting the Dems via voter fraud/election interference as was documented by Project Veritas, and he cannot control state officials breaking laws by not letting legal election observers do their job.
Trump warned for months about voter fraud, they created a legal fund/the to address it, and have put it in motion to deal with the voter fraud issues.
Depending on using false calls of a mass shooting is a bad idea, as it only would hurt any cries of voter fraud that come from places it was done.Trump should have had people on the ground at every precinct in Philly, Detroit, and Milwaukee from election day opening (with live streaming video the entire time). Then had them camp out at every counting location and if observers aren't allowed inside, call 911 and report a shooting at the location (or a fire). False 911 calls is only a misdemeanor with a fine. If it persists, you have Trump take to twitter and call his supporters to put ten thousand people around that building right them and there and lock it down, refusing to leave or allow anyone in or out. You make it a national news story instantly and you demand that your observers be allowed to watch the process.
That depends on what occurs in other states and what ends up happening before the case gets to SCOTUS.SCOTUS will likely rule in Trump's favour, both via ideological similarity and gratitude for him putting them there (also I reckon some Neocons and Neoliberals who are low-key corrupt might be a bit alarmed at the sheer scale of all this. There's embezzlement, then there's this). Why do people seem to forget that on here?
SCOTUS will likely rule in Trump's favour, both via ideological similarity and gratitude for him putting them there (also I reckon some Neocons and Neoliberals who are low-key corrupt might be a bit alarmed at the sheer scale of all this. There's embezzlement, then there's this). Why do people seem to forget that on here?
I agree I’m still a bit pissed off myself. Though two days of very little sleep only made things worse. I think everyone should take a deep breathe and relax. This way we can look at things rationally.Anger is understandable, rage is understandable good channel it into some thing constructive.
Again, choosing electors means choosing the people for the job, not choosing who those electors vote for.
Yes, but they can choose Trump electors.Again, choosing electors means choosing the people for the job, not choosing who those electors vote for.
Who really gives a fuck about the salty leftists though?We have to remember even if trump wins the election, it's still going to be somewhat of a hill because suprise suprise Alt-Tech media is not quite as influential as we had hoped and half the US is going to feel cheated regardless of who wins. Buckle your seatbelts kids.